Gesture and collaborative planning: A case study of a student writing group

Written Communication

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 298-332

  Wolfe, Joanna ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE   (United States)

Author keywords

Collaborative writing; Gender; Gesture; Pretext; Teamwork

Indexed keywords

EID: 22744455825     PISSN: 07410883     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0741088305278108     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2. Briton, N. J., & Hall, J. A. (1995). Beliefs about female and male nonverbal communication. Sex Roles, 32, 79-90.
3. Cohen, A. L., Cash, D., Muller, M. J., & Culberson, C. (1999). Writing apart and designing together. In CHI 99 (pp. 198-199). New York: ACM Press.
4. Cross, G. A. (2000). Collective form: An exploration of large-group writing. Journal of Business Communication, 37(1), 77-101.
5. Driskell, J. E., & Radtke, P. H. (2003). The effect of gesture on speech production and comprehension. Human Factors, 45(3), 445-454.
6. Eakins, B., & Eakins, G. (1978). Verbal turn-taking and exchanges in faculty dialogue. Paper presented at the Sociology of the Languages of American Women conference, Las Cruces, New Mexico.
7. Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1969). The repertoire of nonverbal behavior: Categories, origins, usages, and coding. Semiotica, 1, 49-98.
8. Fleiss, J. L. (1981). Statistical methods for rates and proportions. New York: John Wiley.
9. Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981, December). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365-387.
10. Furuyama, N. (2000). Gestural interaction between the instructor and the learner in origami instruction. In D. McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 99-117). New York: Cambridge University Press.
11. Haas, C. (1996). Writing technology: Studies on the materiality of literacy. Mahwah. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum,
12. Haas, C., & Witte, S. (2001). Writing as an embodied practice: The case of engineering standards. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 15(4), 413-457.
13. Hall, J. A. (1984). Nonverbal sex differences: Communication accuracy and expressive style. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
14. Heath, C., Luff, P. (1993). Disembodied conduct: Interactional asymmetries in video-mediated communication. In G. Button (Ed.), Technology in working order: Studies of work, interaction, and technology (pp. 35-54). New York: Routledge.
15. James, D., & Clarke, S. (1993). Women, men and interruptions: A critical review. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Gender and conversational interaction (pp. 231-280). New York: Oxford University Press.
16. Krauss, R. M., Chen, Y., & Chawla, P. (1996). Nonverbal behavior and nonverbal communication: What do conversational hand gestures tell us? In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 28, pp. 389-450). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
17. LeBaron, C., & Streeck, J. (2000). Gestures, knowledge, and the world. In D. McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 118-138). Now York: Cambridge University Press.
18. Lind, M. R (1991). The gender impact of temporary virtual work groups. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 42(4), 276-285.
19. McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20. Morgan, M. (1994). Women as emergent leaders in student collaborative writing groups. JAC, 14(1), 203-219.
21. O'Hara, K., Taylor, A., Newman, W., & Sellen, A. (2002). Understanding the materiality of writing from sources. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 56(3), 269-305.
22. Roth, W.-M. (2002). From action to discourse: The bridging function of gestures. Cognitive Systems Research, 3, 535-554.
23. Sauer, B. (1998). Embodied knowledge: The textual representation of embodied sensory information in a dynamic and uncertain material environment. Written Communication, 15(2), 131-169.
24. Sauer, B. (1999). Embodied experience: Representing risk in speech and gesture. Discourse Studies, 1(3), 321-354.
25. Sproull, L., & Keisler, S. (1991). Connections: New ways of working in the networked organization. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
26. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of quilitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27. Tannen, D. (1993). The relativity of linguistic strategies: Rethinking power and solidarity in gender and dominance. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Gender and conversational interaction (pp. 165-188). New York: Oxford University Press.
28. West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1983). Small insults: A study of interruptions in cross-sex conversations between unacquainted persons. In B. Throne, C. Kramarae, & N. Henley (Eds.), Language, gender and society (pp. 103-118). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
29. Witte, S. P. (1987). Pre-text and composing. College Composition and Communication, 38(4), 397-425.
30. Wolfe, J., & Alexander, K. (2005). The computer expert in a mixed-gendered collaborative writing group. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 19(2), 135-170.
31. Woods, N. (1988). Talking shop: Sex and status as determinants of floor apportionment in a work setting. In J. Coates & D. Cameron (Eds.), Women in their speech communities. New York: Longman.