Understanding the materiality of writing from multiple sources

International Journal of Human Computer Studies

Volumn 56, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 269-305

  O'Hara, Kenton P ^a   Taylor, Alex ^b   Newman, William ^c   Sellen, Abigail J ^d  

^a University Gate ^*  (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SURREY   (United Kingdom)

^c Xerox Research Centre Europe   (United Kingdom)

^d HEWLETT PACKARD LABORATORIES   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Distributed cognition; Ebooks; Materiatity; Reading; Writing

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; HYPERTEXT SYSTEMS; WORD PROCESSING;

COGNITIVE PROCESSES;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 0036523445     PISSN: 10715819     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/ijhc.2001.0525     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Ackerman, J. (1990). Translating context into action. In L. Flower, V. Stein, J. Ackerman, M.J. Kantz, K. McCormick & W.C. Peck, Eds. Reading to Write: Exploring a cognitive and social process. New York: Oxford University Press.
2. Adler, A., Gujar, A., Harrison, B., O'Hara, K. & Sellen, A. (1998). A diary study of work related reading. Proceedings of CHI '98, Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Los Angeles, CA.
3. Bereiter, C. & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The Psychology of Written Communication. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Bracewell, R.J., Frederiksen, C.H. & Frederiksen, J.D. (1982). Cognitive process in composing and comprehending discourse. Educational Psychologist, 17, 146-164.
5. Chalfonte, B., Fish, R.S. & Kraut, R.E. (1992). Expressive richness: a comparison of speech and text as media for revision. Proceedings of CHI '92, Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 21-26. Montery, CA.
6. Creed, A., Dennis, I. & Newstead, S. (1987). Proof-reading on VDUs. Behaviour and Information Technology, 6, 3-13.
7. Dillon, A. (1992). Reading from paper versus screens: a critical review of the empirical literature. Ergonomics, 35, 1297-1326.
8. Dillon, A., Richardson, J. & McKnight, C. (1990). Navigation in hypertext: a critical review of the concept. In D. Diaper, D. Gilmore, G. Cockton & B. Shackel, Eds. INTERACT '90. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
9. Egan, D.E., Remde, J.R., Gomez, L.M., Landauer, T.K., Eberhardt, J. & Lochbaum, C.C. (1989). Formative design-evaluation of SuperBook. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 7, 30-57.
10. Flower, L. & Hayes, J.R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32, 365-387.
11. Flower, L. (1990a). Introduction: Studying cognition in context. In L. Flower, V. Stein, J. Ackerman, M.J. Kantz, K. McCormick, W.C. Peck, Eds. Reading to Write: Exploring a Cognitive and Social Process. New York: Oxford University Press.
12. Flower, L. (1990b). The role of task representation in reading to write. In L. Flower, V. Stein, J. Ackerman, M.J. Kantz, K. McCormick, W.C. Peck, Eds. Reading to Write: Exploring a Cognitive and Social Process. New York: Oxford University Press.
13. Furnas, G. (1986). Generalized fisheye views. Proceedings of CHI '86, Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 16-23. Boston, MA.
14. Gould, J.D. & Grischowsky, N. (1984). Doing the same work with hard copy and cathode ray tube computer terminals. Human Factors, 26, 323-337.
15. Gould, J.D., Alfaro, L., Barnes, V., Finn, R., Grischowsky, N., Minuto, A. & Salaun, J. (1987). Reading is slower form CRT displays than from paper: Attempts to isolate a single variable explanation. Human Factors, 29, 269-299.
16. Grudin, J. (2001). Partitioning digital worlds: focal and peripheral awareness in multiple monitor use. Proceedings of CHI 2001 Conference on human factors in computing systems, Seattle, WA.
17. Haas, C. (1989a). Does the medium make a difference? Two studies of writing with pen and paper and with computers. Human-Computer Interaction, 10, 149-169.
18. Haas, C. (1989b). Seeing it on the screen isn't really seeing it: computer writers' reading problems. In G. Hawisher & C. Selfe, Eds. Coming of Age: Computers in the Composition Classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.
19. Haas, C. (1996). Writing technology: Studies on the materiality of literacy. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Haas, C. & Hayes, J. (1986). What did i just say? Reading problems in writing with the machine. Research in the Teaching of English, 20, 22-35.
21. Halio, M.P. (1990). Student writing: Can the machine maim the message? Academic Computing, 4, 16-19.
22. Hansen, W.J. & Haas, C. (1988). Reading and Writing with computers: a framework for explaining differences in performance. Communications of the ACM, 31, 1080-1089.
23. Hawisher, G. (1987). The effects of word processing on the revision strategies of college freshmen. Research in the Teaching of English, 21, 145-159.
24. Hollan, J., Hutchins, E. & Kirsh, D. (2000). Distributed cognition: toward a new foundation for human-computer interaction research. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 7, 174-196.
25. Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26. Kirsh, D. (1995). The Intelligent Use of Space. Artificial Intelligence, 73, 31-68.
27. Kraut, R.E., Galegher, J., Fish, R.S. & Chalfonte, B.L. (1992). Task requirements and media choice in collaborative writing. Human-Computer Interaction, 7, 375-407.
28. Larkin, J. & Simon, H. (1987). Why a diagram is sometimes worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science, 11, 65-99.
29. Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in Practice. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
30. Lovelace, E.A. & Southall, S.D. (1983). Memory for words and prose and their location on the page. Memory and Cognition, 11, 429-434.
31. McGinley, W. (1992). The role of reading and writing while composing from multiple sources. Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 227-248.
32. Marshall, C. (1998a). The future of annotation in a digital (paper) world. 35th Annual GSLIS Clinic: Successes and Failures of Digital Libraries, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
33. Marshall, C. (1998b). Toward an ecology of hypertext annotation. Proceedings of Hypertext '98, pp. 40-49. Pittsburgh, PA.
34. Muter, P., Latremouille, S.A., Treunit, W.C. & Beam, P. (1982). Extended reading of continuous text on television screens. Human Factors, 24, 501-508.
35. Muter, P. & Maurutto, P. (1991). Reading and skimming from computer screens and books: The paperless office revisited? Behaviour & Information Technology, 10, 257-266.
36. Neuwirth, C.M. & Kaufer, D.S. (1989). The role of external representation in the writing process: Implications for the design of hypertext-based writing tools. Proceedings of Hypertext '89, pp. 319-341. Baltimore, MD.
37. Neuwirth, C.M., Chandhok, R., Charney, D., Wojahn, P. & Kim, L. (1994). Distributed collaborative writing: A comparison of spoken and written modalities for reviewing and revising documents. In Proceedings of the CHI '94 Conference on Computer-Human Interaction, pp. 51-57, Boston, 24-28 April. New York: ACM.
38. Newman, W., Dance, C., Taylor, A., Taylor, S., Taylor, M. & Aldhous, A. (1999). CamWorks: a video-based tool for efficient capture from paper source documents. In The International Conference on Multimedia Computing and Systems, Vol. 2, pp. 647-653, 7-11 June 1999, Florence, Italy.
39. Oakhill, J. & Garnham, A. (1988). Becoming a Skilled Reader. Oxford: Blackwell.
40. O'Hara, K. & Sellen, A.J. (1997). A Comparison of Reading Paper and On-line Documents. Proceedings of CHI '97, Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 335-342. Atlanta, GA.
41. O'Hara, K.P. & Payne, S.J. (1998). The effects of operator implementation cost on planfulness of problem solving and learning. Cognitive Psychology, 35, 34-70.
42. O'Hara, K., Bentley, R. & Sellen, A. (1999). Supporting incidental memory for location of text on small displays. Proceedings of CHI '99, Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Extended Abstracts, pp. 220-221. Pittsburgh, PA.
43. Payne, S.J. (1991). Display-based action at the user interface. International Journal of Man Machine Studies, 35, 275-289.
44. Richardson, J., Dillon, A., McKnight, C. & Saadat-Samardi, M. (1988). The manipulation of screen presented text: experimental investigation of an interface incorporating a movement grammar. HUSAT Memo 431, Loughborough University of Technology.
45. Robertson, G.G. & Mackinlay, J.D. (1983). The document lens. Proceedings of UIST '93, ACM Conference on User Interface Software and Technology, pp. 101-108. Atlanta, GA.
46. Rothkopf, E.Z. (1971). Incidental memory for location of information in text. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 608-613.
47. Schillit, B.N., Golovchinsky, G. & Price, M. (1998). Beyond paper: supporting active reading with free form digital ink annotations. In Proceedings of CHI '98, Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Los Angeles, CA.
48. Scribner, S. (1984). Studying working intelligence. In B. Rogoff & J. Lave (Eds.) Everyday Cognition: Its Development in Social Context. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
49. Sellen, A.J. & Harper, R.H.R. (1997). Paper as an analytic resource for the design of new technologies Proceedings of CHI '97, Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Atlanta, GA.
50. Shipman, F.M. & Marshall, C.C. (1999). Formality considered harmful: experiences, emerging themes, and directions on the use of formal representations in interactive systems. Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, 8, 333-352.
51. Spivey, N.N. & King, J.R. (1989). Readers as writers composing from sources. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 7-26.
52. Stein, V. (1990a). Elaboration: using what you know. In L. Flower, V. Stein, J. Ackerman, M.J. Kantz, K. McCormick & W.C. Peck, Eds. Reading to Write: Exploring a Cognitive and Social Process. New York: Oxford University Press.
53. Stein, V. (1990b). Exploring the cognition of reading to write. In L. Flower, V. Stein, J. Ackerman, M.J. Kantz, K. McCormick & W.C. Peck, Eds. Reading to Write: Exploring a Cognitive and Social Process. New York: Oxford University Press.
54. Taylor, S., Dance, C., Newman, W., Taylor, A., Seeger, M., Taylor, M. & Aldhous, A. (1999). Advances in interactive video scanning of paper documents. In Document Image Processing and Multimedia Colloquium (DIPM99), IEE, Savoy Place, London, England, 25 March.
55. Wright, P. & Lickorish, A. (1984). Ease of annotation in proof-reading tasks. Behaviour and Information Technology, 3, 185-194.
56. Zhang, J. & Norman, D.A. (1994). Representations in Distributed Cognitive tasks. Cognitive Science, 18, 87-122.