Assessment of yeast viability under hyperbaric conditions through a modeling approach

Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology

Volumn 80, Issue 8, 2005, Pages 872-877

  Coutinho, João A P ^a   Belo, Isabel ^b   Ferreira, Eugénio C ^b   Coelho, M Alice Z ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AVEIRO   (Portugal)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINHO   (Portugal)

^c FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Cell viability; Digital image processing; Modeling; Yeast

Indexed keywords

BIOMASS; CELL CULTURE; CELLS; CONCENTRATION (PROCESS); IMAGE PROCESSING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OXYGEN; PRESSURE EFFECTS; SUBSTRATES;

CELL VIABILITY; METHYLENE BLUE STAINING; OXYGEN CONCENTRATION; YEAST VIABILITY;

YEAST;

MODEL;

ARTICLE; BIOMASS; CELL VIABILITY; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONCENTRATION RESPONSE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CULTURE MEDIUM; FED BATCH CULTURE; FUNGAL STRAIN; FUNGUS GROWTH; NONHUMAN; OXIDATION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; YEAST;

SACCHAROMYCES;

EID: 22744446841     PISSN: 02682575     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jctb.1248     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bizukocj M and Ledakowicz S, Morphologically structured model for growth and citric acid accumulation by Aspergillus niger. Enzyme and Microbial Technology 32:268-281 (2003).
2. Henson MA, Dynamic modeling and control of yeast cell populations in continuous biochemical reactors. Computers & Chemical Engineering 27:1185-1199 (2003).
3. Facciotti MCR and Schmidell W, The new concept of minimum cell viability and its consequences on bioprocess design and operation. Braz J Chem Eng 12:22-31 (1995).
4. Oliveira SC, De Castro HF, Visconti AES and Giudici R, Scale-up effects on kinetic parameters and on predictions of a yeast recycle continuous ethanol fermentation model incorporating loss of cell viability. Bioprocess Engineering 23:51-55 (2000).
5. Coutinho JAP and Xavier AMRB, A model for micro/ultrafiltration cell deactivation in cell recycle reactors. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 75:315-319 (2000).
6. Belo I, Study of the effect of pressure on the physiologic behaviour of microorganisms. PhD thesis, Universidade do Minho, (1999). (in Portuguese).
7. Belo I, Pinheiro R and Mota M, Fed-batch cultivation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in a hyperbaric bioreactor. Biotechnol Prog 19:665-671 (2003).
8. Miller GE, Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Anal Chem 31:426-428 (1959).
9. Lange H, Bavouzet JM, Taillandier P and Delorme C, Systematic error and comparison of four methods for assessing the viability of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Tech 7:223-228 (1993).
10. Alfenore S, Cameleyre X, Benbadis L, Bideaux C, Uribelarrea J-L, Goma G, Molina-Jouve C and Guillouet SE, Aeration strategy: a need for very high ethanol performance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae fed-batch process. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 63:537-542 (2004).
11. Calado CRC, Mannesse M, Egmond M, Cabral JMS and Fonseca LP, Production of wild-type and peptide fusion cutinases by recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae MM01 strains. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 78:692-698 (2002).
12. Domingues L, Lima N and Teixeira JA, Alcohol production from cheese whey permeate using genetically modified flocculent yeast cells. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 72:507-514 (2001).
13. Lange H, Taillandier P and Riba JP, Effect of high shear stress on microbial viability. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 76:501-505 (2001).
14. Alexandre H, Ansanay-Galeote V, Dequin S and Blondin B, Global gene expression during short-term ethanol stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEBS Letters 498:98-103 (2001).
15. Pina C, Santos C, Couto JA and Hogg T, Ethanol tolerance of five non-Saccharomyces wine yeasts in comparison with a strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae - influence of different culture conditions. Food Microbiology 21:439-447 (2004).
16. Prausnitz JM, Lichtenthaler RN and Azevedo EG, Molecular Thermodynamics of Fluid Phase Equilibria, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall, New Jersey, USA (1999).
17. Bartlett DH, Microbial life at high pressures. Science Progress 76:476-496 (1992).
18. Coelho MAZ, Belo I, Pinheiro R, Amaral, AL, Mota M, Coutinho JAP and Ferreira EC, Effect of hyperbaric stress on yeast morphology: study by automated image analysis. Applied Microbiol Biotechnol 66:318-324 (2004).