Allergic contact dermatitis from methyldibromoglutaronitrile

Dermatitis

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 80-86

  Bruze, Magnus ^a   Gruvberger, Birgitta ^b   Goossens, An ^b   Hindsén, Monica ^b   Pontén, Ann ^b  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

2 BROMO 2 BROMOMETHYLGLUTARONITRILE; CORTICOSTEROID; NITRILE; PETROLATUM; PRESERVATIVE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CONCENTRATION RESPONSE; FEMALE; HIGH PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; HUMAN; MALE; PATCH TEST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; SAFETY; SENSITIZATION; SKIN ALLERGY;

EID: 22544478125     PISSN: 17103568     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01206501-200506000-00005     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Bruze M, Conde-Salazar L, Goossens A, et al. Thoughts on sensitizers in a standard patch test series. The European Society of Contact Dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 1999;41:241-50.
2. Wilkinson DS, Fregert S, Magnusson B, et al. Terminology of contact dermatitis. Acta Derm Venereol 1970;50:287-92.
3. Gruvberger B, Bruze M, Tammela M. Preservatives in moisturizers on the Swedish market. Acta Derm Venereol 1998;78:52-6.
4. Rastogi SC, Johansen SS. Comparison of high-performance liquid chromatographic methods for the determination of 1,2-dibromo-2,4-dicyanobutane in cosmetic products. J Chromatogr A 1995;692:53-7.
5. European Commission. The rules governing cosmetic products in the European Union. Volume 2. Cosmetic legislation - Cosmetic products. Methods of analysis. Luxembourg: 2000. p. 179-87.
6. Guthrie WG. Analysis of bronopol in water-based lotion. Provisional HPLC method. Nottingham: The Boots Company PLC; 1984.
7. Mathias CG. Contact dermatitis to a new biocide (Tektamer 38) used in a paste glue formulation. Contact Dermatitis 1983;9:418-35.
8. Jackson JM, Fowler JF. Methyldibromoglutaronitrile (Euxyl K400): a new and important sensitizer in the United States? J Am Acad Dermatol 1998;38:934-7.
9. Tosti A, Vincenzi C, Trevisi P, Guerra L. Euxyl K 400: incidence of sensitization, patch test concentration and vehicle. Contact Dermatitis 1995;33:193-5.
10. Geier J, Schnuch A, Brasch J, Gefeller O. Patch testing with methyldibromoglutaronitrile. Am J Contact Dermat 2000;11:207-12.
11. Marks JG, Belsito DV, DeLeo VA, et al. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch test results for the detection of delayed-type hypersensitivity to topical allergens. J Am Acad Dermatol 1998;38:911-8.
12. Wilkinson JD, Shaw S, Andersen KE, et al. Monitoring levels of preservative sensitivity in Europe. A 10-year overview (1991-2000). Contact Dermatitis 2002;46:207-10.
13. Schnuch A, Geier J, Uter W, Frosch PJ. Patch testing with preservatives, antimicrobials and industrial biocides. Results from a multicentre study. Br J Dermatol 1998;138:467-76.
14. Motolese A, Seidenari S, Truzzi M, Giannetti A. Frequency of contact sensitization to Euxyl K 400. Contact Dermatitis 1991;25:128.
15. Corazza M, Mantovani L, Roveggio C, Virgili A. Frequency of sensitization to Euxyl K 400 in 889 cases. Contact Dermatitis 1993;28:298-9.
16. Van Ginkel CJW, Rundervoort GJ. Increasing incidence of contact allergy to the new preservative 1,2-dibromo-2,4-dicyanobutane (methyldibromoglutaronitrile). Br J Dermatol 1995;132:918-20.
17. de Groot AC, Weyland JW. Contact allergy to methyldibromoglutaronitrile in the cosmetics preservative Euxyl K 400. Am J Contact Dermat 1991;2:31-2.
18. de Groot AC, de Cock PA, Coenraads PJ, et al. Methyldibromoglutaronitrile is an important contact allergen in The Netherlands. Contact Dermatitis 1996;34:118-20.
19. Zachariae C, Rastogi S, Devantier C, et al. Methyldibromoglutaronitrile: clinical experience and exposure-based risk assessment Contact Dermatitis 2003;48:150-4.
20. Tosti A, Guerra L, Bardazzi F, Gasparri F. Euxyl K 400: a new sensitizer in cosmetics. Contact Dermatitis 1991;25:89-93.
21. Kelterer D, Kaatz M, Bauer HI, et al. Contact allergy to methyldibromo glutaronitrile in Euxyl K 400 in a cosmetic cream for protection against a permanent wave solution. Contact Dermatitis 2002;46:250.
22. Erdmann SM, Sachs B, Merk HF. Allergic contact dermatitis due to methyldibromo glutaronitrile in Euxyl K 400 in an ultrasonic gel. Contact Dermatitis 2001;44:39-40.
23. Senff H, Exner M, Görtz J, Goos M. Kontaktallergie auf einen neuen Konservierungsstoff. Dermatosen 1989;37:45-6.
24. Mc Fadden JP, Ross JS, Jones AB, et al. Increased rate of patch test reactivity to methyldibromoglutaronitrile. Contact Dermatitis 2000;42:54-5.
25. Guimaraens D, Hernández MI, Gonzalez MA, Conde-Salazar L. Contact allergy to Euxyl K 400 in consecutively patch-tested patients. Contact Dermatitis 2000;43:55-6.
26. Schnuch A, Geier J, Uter W, Frosch PJ. Patch testing with preservatives, antimicrobials and industrial biocides. Results from a multicentre study. Br J Dermatol 1998;138:467-76.
27. Okkerse A, Geursen-Reitsma AM, van Joost TH. Contact allergy to methyldibromoglutaronitrile and certain other preservatives. Contact Dermatitis 1996;34:151-52.
28. Fuchs TH, Enders F, Przybilla B, et al. Contact allergy to Euxyl K 400. Dermatosen 1991;39:151-3.
29. Wong CSM, Beck MH. Occupational contact allergy to methyldibromo glutaronitrile in abrasive cleansers and work creams. Contact Dermatitis 2001;44:311-2.
30. Gebhart M, Stuhlert A, Knopf B. Allergic contact dermatitis due to Euxyl K 400 in an ultrasonic gel. Contact Dermatitis 1993;29:272.
31. O'Donnell BF, Foulds IS. Contact dermatitis due to dibromodicyanobutane in cucumber eye gel. Contact Dermatitis 1993;29:99-100.
32. Silvestre JF, Rodriguez-Serna N, Miquel JF, et al. Allergic contact dermatitis from Euxyl K 400 in a sunscreen cream. Contact Dermatitis 1996;35:315.
33. Motolese A, Seidenari S, Truzzi M, Giannetti A. Frequency of contact sensitization to Euxyl K 400. Contact Dermatitis 1991;25:128.
34. Torres V, Soares AP. Contact allergy to dibromodicyanobutane in a cosmetic cream. Contact Dermatitis 1992;27:114-5.
35. Ross JS, Cronin E, White IR, Rycroft RJG. Contact dermatitis from Euxyl K 400 in cucumber eye gel. Contact Dermatitis 1992;26:60.
36. Corazza M, Mantovani L, Roveggio C, Virgili A. Frequency of sensitization to Euxyl K 400 in 889 cases. Contact Dermatitis 1993;28:298-9.
37. Diba VC, Adisesh A, Statham BN. Occupational allergic contact dermatitis in hospital workers caused by methyldibromoglutaronitrile in a work soap. Contact Dermatitis 2003;48:118-9.
38. Armstrong DKB, Smith HR, Rycroft RJG. Contact allergy to methyldibromo glutaronitrile presenting as severe scalp seborrhoeic eczema. Contact Dermatitis 1999;40:335.
39. Zachariae C, Rastogi S, Devantier C, et al. Methyldibromoglutaronitrile: clinical experience and exposure-based risk assessment. Contact Dermatitis 2003;48:150-4.
40. Jensen CD, Johansen JD, Menné T, Andersen KE. Methyldibromoglutaronitrile in rinse-off products causes allergic contact dermatitis: an experimental study. Br J Dermatol 2004;150:90-5.
41. Vigan M, Brechat N, Girardin P, et al. Un nouvel allergène: le dibromodicyanobutane. Compte rendu dune étude portant sur 310 malades de janvier à décembre 1994. Ann Dermatol Venereol 1996;123:322-4.
42. Fernández E, Navarro JA, Del Pozo L, Fernándes de Corrès L. Allergic contact dermatitis due to dibromodicyanobutane in cosmetics. Contact Dermatitis 1995;32:109-10.
43. Pigatto PD, Bigardi A, Legori A, et al. Allergic contact dermatitis from Tektamer 38 (dibromocyanobutane). Contact Dermatitis 1991;25:138-9.
44. de Groot AC, Bruynzeel DP, Coenraads PJ, et al. Frequency of allergic reactions to methyldibromoglutaronitrile (1,2-dibromo-2,4-dicyanobutane) in The Netherlands. Contact Dermatitis 1991;25:270-1.
45. European Council Directive 76/768/EEC. Official Journal of the European Communities 27/09/1976; L 262 (cosmetics).
46. Bruze M. What is a relevant contact allergy? Contact Dermatitis 1990;23:224-5.