Linking student learning outcomes to instructional practices - Phase III

ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 9815-9825

  Bjorklund, Stefani A ^a,b   Fortenberry, Norman L ^a,b  

^a NATIONAL ACADEMY OF ENGINEERING   (United States)

^b NATIONAL ACADEMIES OF SCIENCES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CURRICULA; DATA REDUCTION; LEARNING SYSTEMS; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; STUDENTS; TECHNICAL PRESENTATIONS;

ASSESSMENT TOOLS; CRITICAL THINKING; ENGINEERING COLLEGES; LEARNING OUTCOMES;

ENGINEERING EDUCATION;

EID: 22544457235     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21535965     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (39)

1. Cupp, Stephanie, M., P. D. Moore, and N. L. Fortenberry. "Linking Student Learning Outcomes to Instructional Practices - Phase I." Annual Conference and Exposition Proceedings, Session 1630, Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education, 2004.
2. Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, Inc. 2003-2004 Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, Baltimore, MD: Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, Inc., 2002.
3. Moore, Paolo Davidian, S. M. Cupp, and N. L. Fortenberry. "Linking Student Learning Outcomes to Instructional Practices - Phase II." Annual Frontiers in Education Conference, Boulder, CO: ASEE/IEEE, 2003.
4. Chickering, Arthur W. and Z. F. Gamson (Eds.). "Applying the Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education." New Directions for Teaching and Learning, Vol. 47, 1991.
5. Bransford, John D., A. L. Brown, and R. R. Cocking, eds. 2000. "How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School." National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
6. "Learner-Centered Psychological Principles: A Framework for School Redesign and Reform." American Psychological Association, 2004. Available at 〈http://www.apa.org/ed/lcp.html〉. Accessed 11/30/2004.
7. Felder, Richard, and R. Brent. "Designing and Teaching Courses to Satisfy the ABET Engineering Criteria." Journal of Engineering Education, v92, no. 1, 7-25.
8. National Research Council. 2002. Scientific Research in Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
9. Astin, A. W. What matters in college: Four critical years revisited. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1993.
10. Tinto, V. "Linking learning and leaving." In Braxton, J. M. (Ed.). Reworking the student departure puzzle. Nashville: The Vanderbilt University Press, 2000.
11. Colbeck, Carol L., A. F. Cabrera, and P. T. Terenzini, "Learning professional confidence: Linking teaching practices, students' self-perceptions, and gender." The Review of Higher Education, 24, 2, 2000, 173-191.
12. Pascarella, E. T and P. T. Terenzini, How college affects students. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1991.
13. Bjorklund, Stefani A., J. M. Parente, and D. Sathianathan. "Effects of Faculty Interaction and Feedback on Gains in Student Skills." Journal of Engineering Education, v93, no.2, 2004, 153-160.
14. Kuh, G. D. and Hu, S. "The effects of student-faculty interaction in the 1990s." The Review of Higher Education, 24, 3, 2001, 309-332.
15. Wankat, P.C. 2002. The Effective, Efficient Professor. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
16. Scorcinelli, M. D. "Research Findings on the Seven Principles," New Directions for Teaching and Learning, v47, 1991, 13-25.
17. th ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
18. nd ed. Edina. MN: Interaction Book Company.
19. Colbeck, Carol L., S. E. Campbell, and S. A. Bjorklund. "Grouping in the Dark: What Students Learn from Group Projects." Journal of Higher Education, v 71, no. 1, 2000, 60-83.
20. Olds, Barbara and R. Miller, "The Effect of a First-Year Integrated Engineering Curriculum on Graduation Rates and Student Satisfaction: A Longitudinal Study." Journal of Engineering Education, v93, no.1, 2004, 23-35.
21. Carson, B. H. "Thirty Years of Stories: The Professor's Place in Student Memories." Change, 28, 6, 1996, 11-7.
22. Boudtedt, Aileen. 2003. "A Special Report on the Next Revolution in Higher Education," Project 2020, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University.
23. Vines, D. L., and Rowland, J. R. "An instructional feedback model for improved learning and mentoring." Paper presented at the annual meeting of Frontiers in Education, 1995.
24. Prince, Michael, "Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research," Journal of Engineering Education, v93, no.3, 2004, 223-231.
25. Terenzini, Patrick T., A. F. Cabrera, C. L. Colbeck, J. M. Parente, and S. A. Bjorklund. "Collaborative Learning vs. Lecture/Discussion: Students' Reported Learning Gains," Journal of Engineering Education, v90, no. 1, 123-130.
26. McKenna, Ann F. and Alice M. Agogino. "Supporting Mechanical Reasoning with a Representationally-Rich Learning Environment." Journal of Engineering Education, v93, no.2, 2004, 97-104.
27. Baxter Magolda, Marcia. 1992. Knowing and Reasoning in College: Gender-Related Patterns in Students' Intellectual Development. Jossey-Bass.
28. Laeser, Melissa, B.M. Moskal, R. Knecht, and D. Lasich, "Engineering Design: Examining the Impact of Gender and the Team's Composition,"Journal of Engineering Education, v992, no.1, 2003, 49-56.
29. Colbeck, C. L., Cabrera, A. F., & Terenzini, P. T. (1999). Teaching for professional competence and confidence: The link between instructional practices and learning gains for female and male students. In Designing the Future of Science and Engineering Education. Proceedings of the 1999 Frontiers in Education Conference. Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
30. Hsieh, S. and P. Yee Hsieh. "Integrated Virtual Learning System for Programmable Logic Controller." Journal of Engineering Education, v93, no.2, 2004, 169-178.
31. Ellis, Timothy. "Animating to Build Higher Cognitive Understanding: A Model for Studying Multimedia Effectiveness in Education." Journal of Engineering Education, v93, no.1, 2004, 59-64.
32. Zelik, M., "Concept Mapping," Field-tested Learning Assessment Guide (FLAG), 〈http://www.flaguide.org/cat/minutepapers/conmap1.htm〈, accessed December 2004.
33. Nuhfer, Edward and D. Knipp. "The Knowledge Survey: A Tool for All Reasons." To Improve the Academy, v21, 59-78.
34. Besterfield-Sacre, Mary, J. Gerchak, M. Lyons, L. J. Shuman, and H. Wolfe, "Scoring Concept Maps: An Integrated Rubric fro Assessing Engineering Education." Journal of Engineering Education, v93, no.2, 2004, 105-115.
35. Boustedt, Aileen, "New Brain Discoveries Challenge Traditional Education." Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University. Available at http://homepage.mac.com/vogitrish/ERAU_Project2020/documents/ NSFProject2020Summary_000.pdf. Accessed December, 2004.
36. Hersam, Mark, C., M. Luna, and G. Light. "Implementation of Interdisciplinary Group Learning and Peer Assessment in a Nanotechnology Engineering Course." Journal of Engineering Education, v93, no. 1, 2004, 49-57.
37. Jones, B.F., G. Valdez, J. Nowakowski, and C. Rasmussen, 1995. "Plugging In: Choosing and Using Educational Technology." Washington, DC: Council for Educational Development and Research, and North Central Regional Educational Laboratory. Available online: http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/edtalk/toc. htm
38. Ohland, Matthew, W., Frillman, S. A., Zhang, G., Brawner, C. E., and Miller III, T. K. "The Effect of an Entrepreneurship Program on GPA and Retention," Journal of Engineering Education, v93, no. 4, 293-301.
39. Carlson, Lawrence, J. Sullivan, S. Poole, and M. Piket-May. "Engineers as Entrepreneurs: Invention and Innovation in Design and Build Courses." Paper presented at the Frontiers in Education annual conference, San Juan, PR, November 1999. Available at 〈http://fie.engrng.pitt.edu/ fie99/papers/1140.pdf〉.