Selecting spatial frames of reference for visual target localization

Experimental Psychology

Volumn 52, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 201-212

  Kunde, Wilfried ^a   Hoffmann, Joachim ^b  

^a MARTIN LUTHER UNIVERSITY HALLE WITTENBERG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Frames of reference; Spatial coding; Visual search

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; RECEPTIVE FIELD;

ADULT; ATTENTION; FEMALE; FIELD DEPENDENCE-INDEPENDENCE; HUMANS; MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME;

EID: 22544441654     PISSN: 16183169     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169.52.3.201     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Attneave, F. (1954). Some informational aspects of visual perception. Psychological Review, 61, 183-191.
2. Behrmann, M., & Tipper, S. P. (1999). Attention accesses multiple reference frames: Evidence form visual neglect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25(1), 83-101.
3. Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94, 115-117.
4. Carlson Radvansky, L. A., & Irwin, D. E. (1994). Reference frame activation during spatial term assignment. Journal of Memory and Language, 33(5), 646-671.
5. Carlson Radvansky, L. A., & Logan, G. D. (1997). The influence of reference frame selection on spatial template construction. Journal of Memory and Language, 37(3), 411-437.
6. Corballis, M. C. (1988). Recognition of disoriented shapes. Psychological Review, 95(1), 115-123.
7. Farah, M. J., Brunn, J. L., Wong, A. B., & Wallace, M. A. (1990). Frames of reference for allocating attention to space: Evidence from the neglect syndrome. Neuropsychologia, 28(4), 335-347.
8. Gibson, B. S., & Egeth, H. (1994). Inhibition of return to object-based and environmental-based locations. Perception & Psychophysics, 55, 323-339.
9. Hinton, G. E., & Parsons, L. M. (1988). Scene-based and viewer-centered representations for comparing shapes. Cognition, 30(1), 1-35.
10. Hoffmann, J., & Kunde, W. (1999). Location-specific target expectancies in visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25(4), 1127-1141.
11. Hummel, J. E., & Biederman, I. (1992). Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition. Psychological Review, 99, 480-517.
12. Kingstone, A. (1992). Combining expectancies. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Experimental Psychology, 44A, 69-104.
13. Kingstone, A., & Klein, R. (1991). Combining shape and position expectancies: Hierarchical processing and selective inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 512-519.
14. Kunde, W. (1999). Lokationsspezifische Stimuluserwartungen in der visuellen Suche. [Location-specific stimulus expectancies in visual search]. Aachen, Germany: Shaker.
15. Lambert, A. J., & Hockey, R. (1986). Selective attention and performance with a multidimensional visual display. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12, 484-495.
16. Logan, G. D. (1994). Spatial attention and the apprehension of spatial relations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20(5), 1015-1036.
17. Marr, D. (1982). Vision. San Francisco: Freemann.
18. Miller, J. (1988). Components of the location probability effect in visual search tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 14, 453-471.
19. Posner, M. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3-25.
20. Robertson, L. C. (1995). Covert orienting biases in scene-based reference frames: Orientation priming and visual field differences. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 21, 707-718.
21. Roswarski, T. E., & Proctor, R. W. (1996). Multiple spatial codes and temporal overlap in choice-reaction tasks. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 59, 196-211.
22. Schneider, W. X. (1995). VAM: A neuro-cognitive model for visual attention control of segmentation, object recognition and space-based motor action. In C. Bundesen, H. Shibuya et al. (Eds.), Visual selective attention. Visual Cognition (Vol. 2, Nos. 2 & 3, pp. 331-376). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
23. Shaw, M. L., & Shaw, P. (1977). Optimal allocation of cognitive resources to spatial location. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 201-211.
24. Tipper, S. P., Weaver, B., Jerrat, L. M., & Burak, A. L. (1994). Object-based and environment-based inhibition of return of visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20(3), 478-499.
25. Tipper, S. P., & Behrmann, M. (1996). Object-centered not scene-based visual neglect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 1261-1278.
26. Tipper, S. P., Jordan, H., & Weaver, B. (1999). Scene-based and object-centered inhibition of return: Evidence for dual orienting mechanisms. Perception and Psychophysics, 61(1), 50-60.
27. Treisman, A., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
28. Treisman, A., & Schmidt, H. (1982). Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 107-141.
29. Tsal, Y., & Lavie, N. (1988). Attending to color and shape: The special role of location in selective visual processing. Perception and Psychophysics, 44(1), 15-21.
30. Umiltà, C., Castiello, U., Fontana, M., & Vestri, A. (1995). Object-centred orienting of attention. In C. Bundesen, H. Shibuya et al. (Eds.), Visual selective attention. Visual Cognition (Vol. 2, Nos. 2 & 3, pp. 165-181). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.