Evolution within a bizarre phylum: Homologies of the first echinoderms

American Zoologist

Volumn 38, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 965-974

  Mooi, Rich ^a   David, Bruno ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 22444454635     PISSN: 00031569     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/icb/38.6.965     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. David, B. and R. Mooi. 1996. Embryology supports a new theory of skeletal homologies for the phylum Echinodermata. Comptes Rendus Acad. Sei. Paris 319:577-584.
2. David, B. and R. Mooi. 1998. Major events in the evolution of echinoderms viewed by the light of embryology. In R. Mooi and M. Telford (eds.), Echinoderms: San Francisco. Balkema, Rotterdam. (In press)
3. David, B., R. Mooi, and M. Telford. 1995. The ontogenetic basis of Lovén's Rule clarifies homologies of the echinoid peristome. In R. H. Emson, A. B. Smith, and A. C. Campbell (eds.), Echinoderm Research 1995, pp. 155-164. Balkema, Rotterdam.
4. Fortey, R. A., D. E. G. Briggs, and M. A. Mills. 1996. The Cambrian evolutionary "explosion": Decoupling cladogenesis from morphological disparity. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 57:13-33.
5. Gehling, J. G. 1987. Earliest known echinoderm-a new Ediacaran fossil from the Pound Subgroup of South Australia. Alcheringa 11:337-345.
6. Giese, A. C., J. S. Pearse, and V. B. Pearse. (eds.) 1991. Reproduction of Marine Invertebrates, Vol. 6, Echinoderms and Lophophorates. Boxwood Press, Pacific Grove, California.
7. Guensburg, T. E. and J. Sprinkle. 1994. Revised phylogeny and functional interpretation of the Edrioasteroidea based on new taxa from the Early and Middle Ordovician of western Utah. Fieldiana (Geology), New Sen 29:1-43.
8. Holland, N. D. 1988. The meaning of developmental asymmetry for echinoderm evolution: A new interpretation. In C. R. C. Paul and A. B. Smith (eds.), Echinoderm phytogeny and evolutionary biology, pp. 13-25. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
9. Hotchkiss, F. H. C. 1995. Lovén's law and adult ray homologies in echinoids, ophiuroids, edrioasteroids, and an ophiocistioid (Echinodermata: Eleutherozoa). Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash. 108:401435.
10. Hyman, L. 1955. The Invertebrates, Vol. 4, Echinodennata. McGraw-Hill, New York.
11. Jefferies, R. P. S. 1997. How chordates and echinoderms separated from each other and the problem of dorso-ventral inversion. Paleont. Soc. Papers 3: 249-266.
12. Littlewood, D. T. J., A. B. Smith, K. A. Clough, and R. H. Emson. 1997. The interrelationships of the echinoderm classes: Morphological and molecular evidence. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 61:409-438.
13. Mooi, R. and B. David. 1997. Skeletal homologies of echinoderms. Paleont. Soc. Papers 3:305-335.
14. Mooi, R., B. David, and D. Marchand. 1994. Echinoderm skeletal homologies: Classical morphology meets modern phylogenetics. In B. David, A. Guille, J. P. Feral, and M. Roux (eds.), Echinoderms through time {Echinoderms Dijon), pp. 8795. Balkema, Rotterdam.
15. Nielsen, C. 1995. Animal evolution. Interrelationships of the living phyla. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
16. Parsley, R. L. 1997. The echinoderm classes Stylophora and Homoiostelea: Non Calcichordata. Paleont. Soc. Papers 3:225-248.
17. Paul, C. R. C. and A. B. Smith. 1984. The early radiation and phylogeny of echinoderms. Biol. Rev. 59:443-481.
18. Peterson, K. J., R. A. Cameron, and E. H. Davidson. 1997. Set-aside cells in maximal indirect devel-opment: Evolutionary and developmental significance. BioEssays 19:623-631.
19. Raff, R. A., K. G. Field, M. T. Ghiselin, D. J. Lane, G. J. Olsen, N. R. Pace, A. L. Parks, B. A. Parr, and E.G. Raff. 1988. Molecular analysis of distant phylogenetic relationships in echinoderms. In C. R. C. Paul, and A. B. Smith (eds.), Echinodenn phylogeny and evolutionary biology, pp. 29-41. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
20. Smith, A. B. 1985. Cambrian eleutherozoan echinoderms and the early diversification of edrioasteroids. Palaeontology 28:715-756.
21. Smith, A. B. 1988a. Fossil evidence for the relationships of extant echinoderm classes and their times of divergence. In C. R. C. Paul and A. B. Smith (eds.), Echinoderm phylogeny and evolutionary biology, pp. 85-97. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
22. Smith, A. B. 1988fr. Patterns of diversification and extinction in early Palaeozoic echinoderms. Palaeontology 31:799-828.
23. Smith, A. B. 1990. Evolutionary diversification of echinoderms during the early Palaeozoic. In P. D. Taylor and G. P. Larwood (eds.), Major evolutionary radiations, pp. 265-286. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
24. Smith, A. B. and P. A. Jell. 1990. Cambrian edrioasteroids from Australia and the origin of starfishes. Mem. Queensland Mus. 28:715-778.
25. Sprinkle, J. 1973. Morphology and evolution of blastozoan echinoderms. Mus. of Comp. Zool. Spec. Pub. Cambridge.
26. Sprinkle, J. 1992. Radiation of Echinodermata. In J. H. Lipps and P. W. Signor (eds.), Origin and early evolution of the Metazoa, pp. 375-398. Plenum Press, New York.
27. Sprinkle, J. and T. E. Guensburg. 1997. Early radiation of echinoderms. Paleont. Soc. Papers 3:205-224.
28. Strathmann, R. 1988. Larvae, phylogeny, and von Baer's Law. In C. R. C. Paul and A. B. Smith (eds.), Echinoderm phylogeny and evolutionary biology, pp. 53-68. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
29. Sumrall, C. D. 1997. The role of fossils in the phylogenetic reconstruction of Echinodermata. Paleont. Soc. Papers 3:267-288.
30. Ubaghs, G. 1968. General characters of Echinodermata. In R. C. Moore (ed.), Treatise on invertebrate paleontology. Part S, Echinodennata I, pp. S3-S60. Geol. Soc. Amer, and Univ. of Kansas Press, Lawrence.
31. Wada, H. and N. Satoh. 1994. Phylogenetic relationships among extant classes of echinoderms, as inferred from sequences of 18S rDNA, coincide with relationships deduced from the fossil record. J. Mol. Evol. 38:41-49.