Mining institutional datasets to support policy making and implementation

Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 285-298

  Yorke, Mantz ^a   Barnett, Greg ^b   Evanson, Peter ^b   Haines, Chris ^c   Jenkins, Don ^d   Knight, Peter ^e   Scurry, Dave ^f   Stowell, Marie ^g   Woolf, Harvey ^h  

^a LIVERPOOL JOHN MOORES UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b LONDON METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c MIDDLESEX UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^d ANGLIA RUSKIN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^e Open University

^f OXFORD BROOKES UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^g UNIVERSITY OF WORCESTER   (United Kingdom)

^h UNIVERSITY OF WOLVERHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 22144440843     PISSN: 1360080X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13600800500120241     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Bridges, P., Cooper, A., Evanson, P., Haines, C., Jenkins, D., Scurry, D., Woolf, H., & Yorke, M. (2002). Coursework marks high, examination marks low: discuss. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(1), 35-48.
2. Dalziel, J. (1998). Using marks to assess student performance. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 23(4), 351-66.
3. DfES [Department for Education and Skills] (2003). The future of higher education (Cm. 5753). Norwich: The Stationery Office.
4. HEFCE (2003). Schooling effects on higher education achievement [Report 03/32]. Retrieved 1 October 2004 from http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/hefce/2003/ 03_32.htm.
5. Naylor, R., & Smith, J. (2002). Schooling effects on subsequent university performance: evidence for the UK university population [Warwick Economic Research Papers No. 657]. Coventry: Department of Economics, Warwick University.
6. Ramsden, P. (1 October 2004). The evidence is there, so let's make use of it. The Times Higher Education Supplement. No. 1660. p 12.
7. Smith, A. (Chair). (2004). Making mathematics count [The report of Professor Adrian Smith's inquiry into post-14 Mathematics education]. London: Department for Education and Skills.
8. Woodfield, R., Earl-Novell, S., & Solomon, L. (2005). Gender and mode of assessment at university: Should we assume female students are better suited to coursework and males to unseen examinations? Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(1), 35-50.
9. UUK (2002). Social class and participation in higher education: From elitism to inclusion 2. London: Universities UK.
10. Yorke, M. (2002). Degree classifications in English, Welsh and Northern Irish Universities: Trends, 1994-95 to 1998-99. Higher Education Quarterly, 56(1), 92-108.
11. Yorke, M. (2004). Institutional research and its relevance to the performance of higher education institutions. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 26(2), 141-52.
12. Yorke, M., with Barnett, G., Evanson, P., Haines, C., Jenkins, D., Knight, P., Scurry, D., Stowell, M., & Woolf, H. (2004). Self-help in research and development relating to assessment: A case-study. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(4), 389-99.
13. Yorke, M., Cooper, A., Fox, W., Haines, C., McHugh, P., Turner, D., & Woolf, H. (1996). Module mark distributions in eight subject areas and some issues they raise. In N. Jackson (Ed.), Modular higher education in the UK (pp. 105-7). London: Higher Education Quality Council.