Ligand accumulation in autocrine cell cultures

Biophysical Journal

Volumn 88, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 2384-2390

  Monine, Michael I ^a   Berezhkovskii, Alexander M ^b,f   Joslin, Elizabeth J ^c   Wiley, H Steven ^d   Lauffenburger, Douglas A ^c   Shvartsman, Stanislav Y ^a,e  

^a Princeton University   (United States)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

^c MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^d PACIFIC NORTHWEST NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^e PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f KARPOV INSTITUTE OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LIGAND;

ARTICLE; AUTOCRINE CELL; BIOPHYSICS; CELL CULTURE; CELL SURVIVAL; CELL TYPE; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SIMULATION; STOCHASTIC MODEL; THEORY;

EID: 22144433647     PISSN: 00063495     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.104.051425     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Batsilas, L., A. M. Berezhkovskii, and S. Y. Shvartsman. 2003. Stochastic model of autocrine and paracrine signals in cell culture assays. Biophys. J. 85:3659-3665.
2. Berezhkovskii, A. M., L. Batsilas, and S. Y. Shvartsman. 2004a. Ligand trapping in epithelial layers and cell cultures. Biophys. Chem. 107:221-227.
3. Berezhkovskii, A. M., Y. M. Makhnovskii, M. Monine, V. Y. Zitserman, and S. Y. Shvartsman. 2004b. Boundary homogenization for trapping by patchy surfaces. J. Chem. Phys. 121:11390-11394.
4. DeWitt, A., J. Dong, H. Wiley, and D. Lauffenburger. 2001. Quantitative analysis of the EGF receptor autocrine system reveals cryptic regulation of cell response by ligand capture. J. Cell Sci. 114:2301-2313.
5. DeWitt, A., T. Iida, H. Lam, V. Hill, H. S. Wiley, and D. A. Lauffenburger. 2002. Affinity regulates spatial range of EGF receptor autocrine ligand binding. Dev. Biol. 250:305-316.
6. Dong, J. Y., L. K. Opresko, P. J. Dempsey, D. A. Lauffenburger, R. J. Coffey, and H. S. Wiley. 1999. Metalloprotease-mediated ligand release regulates autocrine signaling through the epidermal growth factor receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci USA. 96:6235-6240.
7. Dong, J. Y., and H. S. Wiley. 1999. Trafficking and proteolytic release of epidermal growth factor receptor ligands are modulated by their membrane-anchoring domains. J. Biol. Chem. 275:557-564.
8. Forsten, K. E., and D. A. Lauffenburger. 1992a. Autocrine ligand-binding to cell receptors-mathematical analysis of competition by solution decoys. Biophys. J. 61:518-529.
9. Forsten, K. E., and D. A. Lauffenburger. 1992b. Interrupting autocrine ligand-receptor binding-comparison between receptor blockers and ligand decoys. Biophys. J. 63:857-861.
10. Forsten, K. E., and D. A. Lauffenburger. 1994. The role of low-affinity interleukin-2 receptors in autocrine ligand-binding-alternative mechanisms for enhanced binding effect. Mol. Immunol. 31:739-751.
11. Goldstein, B., and M. Dembo. 1995. Approximating the effects of diffusion on reversible reactions at the cell-surface-ligand-receptor kinetics. Biophys. J. 68:1222-1230.
12. Hendriks, B. S., L. K. Opresko, H. S. Wiley, and D. Lauffenburger. 2003a. Coregulation of epidermal growth factor receptor/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) levels and locations: quantitative analysis of HER2 overexpression effects. Cancer Res. 63:1130-1137.
13. Hendriks, B. S., L. K. Opresko, H. S. Wiley, and D. Lauffenburger. 2003b. Quantitative analysis of HER2-mediated effects on HER2 and epidermal growth factor receptor endocytosis-distribution of homo- and heterodimers depends on relative HER2 levels. J. Biol. Chem. 278:23343-23351.
14. Hendriks, B. S., H. S. Wiley, and D. Lauffenburger. 2003c. HER2-mediated effects on EGFR endosomal sorting: analysis of biophysical mechanisms. Biophys. J. 85:2732-2745.
15. Lauffenburger, D. A., and J. J. Linderman. 1993. Receptors: Models for Binding. Trafficking, and Signaling. Oxford University Press, New York.
16. Lauffenburger, D. A., G. T. Oehrtman, L. Walker, and H. S. Wiley. 1998. Real-time quantitative measurement of autocrine ligand binding indicates that autocrine loops are spatially localized. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 95:15368-15373.
17. Nalwaya, N., and W. M. Deen. 2004. Peroxynitrite exposure of cells co-cultured with macrophages. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 32:664-676.
18. Oehrtman, G. T., H. S. Wiley, and D. A. Lauffenburger. 1998. Escape of autocrine ligands into extracellular medium: experimental test of theoretical model predictions. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 57:571-582.
19. Pierce, K. L., A. Tohgo, S. Ahn, M. E. Field, L. M. Luttrell, and R. J. Lefkowitz. 2001. Epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor-dependent ERK activation by G protein-coupled receptors: a co-culture system for identifying intermediates upstream and downstream of heparin-binding EGF shedding. J. Biol. Chem. 276:23155-23160.
20. Shvartsman, S. Y., M. P. Hagan, A. Yacoub, P. Dent, H. S. Wiley, and D. A. Lauffenburger. 2002. Autocrine loops with positive feedback enable context-dependent cell signaling. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 282:C545-C559.
21. Shvartsman, S. Y., H. S. Wiley, W. M. Deen, and D. A. Lauffenburger. 2001. Spatial range of autocrine signaling: modeling and computational analysis. Biophys. J. 81:1854-1867.
22. Wiley, H. S., S. Y. Shvartsman, and D. A. Lauffenburger. 2003. Computational modeling of the EGF-receptor system: a paradigm for systems biology. Trends Cell Biol. 13:43-50.
23. Wiley, H. S., M. F. Woolf, L. K. Opresko, P. M. Burke, B. Will, J. R. Morgan, and D. A. Lauffenburger. 1998. Removal of the membrane-anchoring domain of epidermal growth factor leads to intracrine signaling and disruption of mammary epithelial cell organization. J. Cell Biol. 143:1317-1328.