Technology and rights

International Journal of Technology and Design Education

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 181-204

  Petrina, Stephen ^a   Volk, Kenneth ^b   Kim, Soowook ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b THE EDUCATION UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Bioethics; Biotechnology; Ethics; Intellectual property rights; Politics of technology; Rights; Technological literacy

Indexed keywords

BIOTECHNOLOGY; COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY; LAWS AND LEGISLATION; PATENTS AND INVENTIONS;

BIOETHICS; ETHICS; INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS; POLITICS OF TECHNOLOGY; RIGHTS; TECHNOLOGICAL LITERACY;

TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 22044444830     PISSN: 09577572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10798-004-0809-6     Document Type: Article

References (91)

1. Abel, S.: 2003, Trademark Issues in Cyberspace: The Brave New Frontier, Fenwick and West, LLP, Mountain View, CA, USA.
2. Allen, O. E.: 1990, The Power of Patents', American Heritage 41(6), 47-59.
3. American Civil Liberties Union.: 2003, 'USA PATRIOT Act', Retrieved November 23, 2003, from: http://www.aclu.org/SafeandFree.
4. American Medical Student Association.: 2003, A Primer on Gene Patents, Author, Reston, VA. USA.
5. Bacon, F.: 1914, The New Atlantis', Volume III, Part 2, In C. Eliot (ed.), The Harvard Classics, Collier, New York.
6. Barlow, J. P.: 1994, The Economy of Ideas', Wired 3(2), 1-5.
7. Barnett, R. E.: 1993, 'A Ninth Amendment for Today's Constitution', In D. Bodenhamer & J. W. Ely (eds.), The Bill of Rights in Modern America, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, 177-190.
8. Battiste, M., & Henderson, J. S. Y.: 2000, Protecting Indigenous Knowledge and Heritage: A Global Challenge, Purich, Saskatoon.
9. Bennett, J.: 1986, 'Orwell's 1984: Was Orwell Right?, Journal of Historical Review 6(1), 9-15.
10. Blank, P. D., & Sandler, L. A.: 2003, 'ADA Title III and the Internet: Technology and Civil Rights', Retrieved December 15, 2003, from.
11. Bohn, D.: 2003, 'Patriot Act Report Documents Civil Rights Complaints', Retrieved November 25, 2003, from http://edition.cnn.com/2003/LAW/07/21/justice. civil.liberties/.
12. Bozovic, M., (Ed.): 1995, Jeremy Bentham: The Panopticon Writings, Verso, London.
13. Brin, D.: 1998, The Transparent Society, Perseus, Reading, MA, USA.
14. Bryson, M., & de Castell, S.: 1996, 'Learning to Make a Difference: Gender, New Technologies, and In/Equity', Mind, Culture and Activity 2(1), 3-21.
15. CBC.: 2003, Canada Commits to Making Generic AIDS Drugs Available, Retrieved October 5, 2003, from http://www.cbc.ca/stories/2003/10/01/aids031001.
16. Cohen, J.: 2000, 'More Censorship or Less Discrimination? Sexual Orientation Hate Propaganda in Multiple Perspectives', McGill Law Journal 46(1), 69-104.
17. Cole, P.: in press, Trick(ster)s of Aboriginal Research: Or how to use Ethical Review Strategies to Perpetuate Cultural Genocide', Native Studies Review.
18. Coleman, J., & Sullivan, B.: 2002, 'Enduring and Empowering: The Bill Of Rights in the Third Millennium', Law and Contemporary Problems 65(3), 1-13.
19. de Berry, J.: 2001, 'Child Soldiers and the Convention of rights of the child', Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 575, 92-105.
20. Doppelt, G.: 2001, 'What Sort Of Ethics Does Technology Require?', Journal of Ethics 5(2), 155-175.
21. Elshof, L.: 2003, Technological Education, Interdisciplinarity and Sustainable Development', Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 3(2), 165-184.
22. Evans, T.: 2001, The Politics of Human Rights: A Global Perspective, Pluto Press, London.
23. Feenberg, A.: 2001, 'Democratizing Technology: Interests, Codes, Rights', Journal of Ethics, 5(2), 177-195.
24. Ferré, F.: 1988, Philosophy of Technology, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA.
25. Fox, J.: 2001, 'Canadian Farmer Found Guilty of Canola Patent Infringement', Nature Biotechnology 19(5), 396-397.
26. Freitas, R.: 1985, The Legal Rights of Robots', Student Lawyer 13(1), 54-56.
27. Fried, I.: 2003, 'SCO Linux Claims - A Legal View', Retrieved September 26, 2003, from http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1104 2-5082181.html.
28. Griffor, M.: 2003, 'Hate and Violence in the Virtual World', The South End Online, http://www.southend.wayne.edu/days/2003/September/9182003/oped/ violence/violence.html.
29. Glendon, M. A.: 1991, Rights Talk: The Impoverishment of Political Discourse, Free Press, New York.
30. Haraway, D.: 1997, Modest Wittness@Second Millennium: Femaleman Meets Oncomouse, Routledge, New York.
31. Hays, M.: 2003, 'Blame Canada', The Advocate, 894, http://www.advocate. com/html/stories/894/894_canada.asp.
32. HHMI Bulletin.: 2001, 'Gleevec's Glory Days', Retrieved October 6, 2003, from http://www.hhmi.org/bulletin/dec2001/gleevec/gleevec2.html.
33. Institute of Women and Ethnic Studies: 2000, Reproductive Health Bill of Rights For Women of Color, Author, New Orleans.
34. Ives, N.: 2003, 'Iowa Professor Owns Phrase "Freedom Of Expression", New York Times, Retrieved November 24, 2003, from: http://www.nytimes.com/2003/01/23/business/media/23ADCO.html.
35. Jonas, H.: 1984, The Imperative of Responsibility: In Search of Ethics for the Technological Age, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
36. Kanellos, M., & Hu, J.: 2003, 'Microsoft Ordered to Pay $521 Million', Retrieved October 7, 2003, from http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1104- 5062409.html.
37. Keirl, S.: 2001, Citizenship Education? Not Without a Quality Technology Education it Isn't, Paper presented at the Australian Curriculum Studies Association Biennial Conference, Canberra.
38. Kevles, D.: 2002, A History of Patenting Life in The United States with Comparative Attention To Europe And Canada, European Communities, Luxembourg.
39. Kim, S.: 2003, TRIPs and Public Health', Retrieved October 7, 2003, from http://www.diffwelfare.net/article_view.asp?articleno= 162&category = focus2.
40. Kitch, E.: 1980, The Law and Economics of Rights in Valuable Information', The Journal of Legal Studies 14(4), 683-723.
41. Krimsky, S.: 2003, Science in the Private Interest: Has the Lure of Profits Corrupted Biomedical Research?, Roman and Littlefield: New York.
42. Latour, B.: 1999, Pandora's Hope, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
43. Litras, M. F.: 2000, Civil Rights Complaints in US District Courts, 1990-98, US Department of Justice, Washington, DC, USA.
44. Marker, G.: 1987, 'Science, Technology and the Constitution: A Never-Ending Tension', ERIC 292, 710.
45. Mashelkar, R. A.: 2001, 'Intellectual Property Rights and The Third World', Current Science 81(8), 955-965.
46. McGinn, R.: 1994, Technology, Demography and the Anachronism of Traditional Rights', Journal of Applied Philosophy 11(1), 57-70.
47. McLeod, K.: 2001, Owning Culture: Authorship, Ownership and Intellectual Property Law, Peter Lang, New York.
48. Mehrabadi, A.: 2003, 'From a Satellite Looking Down at our use of Patents in the Great Planetary Scheme of Things', BioTeach Journal 1(1), 13-17.
49. Mill, J. S.: 1859, On Liberty, Longman, London.
50. Myers, W. E.: 2001, The Right Rights? Child Labor in a Globalizing World', Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 575(1), 38-55.
51. Nickel, J. W.: 2002, 'Is Today's International Human Rights System A Global Governance Regime?' Journal of Ethics 6(4), 353-371.
52. Noble, D.: 1977, America by Design: Science, Technology and the Rise Of Corporate Capitalism, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
53. Nuffield Council on Bioethics: 2002, The Ethics of Patenting DNA: A Discussion Paper, Author, London.
54. Office of Technology Assessment: 1987, Science, Technology and the Constitution, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, USA.
55. Office of Technology Assessment: 1988a, Science, Technology and the First Amendment, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, USA.
56. Office of Technology Assessment: 1988b, Biology, Medicine, and the Bill Of Rights, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, USA.
57. Office of Technology Assessment.: 1988c, Criminal Justice, New Technologies and the Constitution, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, USA.
58. Office of Technology Assessment: 1989, New Developments in Biology: Patenting life, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, USA.
59. O'Riley, P.: 2003, Technology, Culture And Socioeconomics: A Rhizoanalysis of Educational Discourses, Peter Lang, New York.
60. O'Riley, P.: in press, 'Shapeshifting Research on Aboriginal Peoples: From Manifest Manners to Self-Empowerment', Native Studies Review.
61. Orwell, G.: 1948, Nineteen Eighty-Four, Penguin, Harmondsworth.
62. Pacey, A.: 1983, The Culture of Technology, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
63. Petrina, S.: 2000, The Politics of Technological Literacy', International Journal of Technology and Design Education 10(2), 181-206.
64. Petrina, S.: 2003a, 'Unbundling Intellectual Property Rights', Faculty Focus: Newsletter of the Faculty Association of UBC 36(7), 7-9.
65. Petrina, S.: 2003b, 'Human Rights and Politically Incorrect Thinking Versus Technically Speaking', Journal of Technology Education 14(2), 70-74.
66. Pogge, T.: 2000, 'The International Significance of Human Rights', Journal of Ethics 4(1), 45-69.
67. Rollin, B.: 1995, The Frankenstein Syndrome: Ethical And Social Issues in The Genetic Engineering of Animals, Cambridge University Press, New York.
68. Rollin, B.: 1997, 'Send In The Clones... Don't Bother, They're Here', Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 10(1), 25-40.
69. Rollin, B.: 1999, 'Keeping Up With the Cloneses: Issues in Human Cloning', Journal of Ethics 3(1), 51-71.
70. Saul, J. R.: 1997, The Unconscious Civilization,
71. Schurman, R., & Kelso, D.D. T.: 2003, Engineering Trouble: Biotechnology and its Discontents, University of California Press, Berkely.
72. Shelley, M. W.: 1818, Frankenstein, or the Modern Prometheus, Penguin, New York.
73. Shiva, V.: 1997, Biopiracy: The Plunder of Nature and Knowledge, South End Press, Boston.
74. Shiva, V.: 2001a, Protect or Plunder? Understanding Intellectual Property Rights, Zed Books, New York.
75. Shiva, V.: 2001b, 'Intellectual Property Protection in The North/South Divide', In C. Heath & A. K. Sanders (eds.), Intellectual Property in The Digital Age: Challenges For Asia, (Kluwer, The Hague, 113-130.
76. Smith, M.: 2001, 'Global Information Justice: Rights, Responsibilities and Caring Connections', Library Trends 19(3), 519-537.
77. Staff W.: 2003, 'Haida Launch Aboriginal Title Case in BC Supreme Court', First Nations Drum, 5(3), http://www.firstnationsdrum.com/Sum2002.
78. Tatum, J. S.: 1996, 'Technology and Liberty: Enriching the Conversation', Technology in Society 18(1), 41-59.
79. Tenner, E.: 1996, Why Things Bite Back: Predicting the Problems of Progress, Fourth estate, London.
80. United Nations: 1948, Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Author, Geneva.
81. Volk, K.: 1990, The Interrelationship Between Political and Technological Systems', Journal of Epsilon Pi Tau 16(1), 47-52.
82. Volk, K.: 1994, 'Technology, You and the Law', Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 14(4), 203-208.
83. Waldron, J.: 2000, The Role of Rights in Practical Reasoning: Rights Versus Needs', Journal of Ethics 4(1), 115-135.
84. Weeramantry, C. G.: 1993, The Impact of Technology on Human Rights, United Nations Press, Tokyo.
85. Weinberger, J.: 1976, 'Science and Rule in Bacon's Utopia: An Introduction to the Reading of the New Atlantis', American Political Science Review 70(3), 865-886.
86. Whitney, C.: 1989, 'Francis Bacon's Instauratio: Domination of and Over Humanity', Journal of the History of Ideas 50(3), 271-391.
87. Whittington, L.: 2003, Cheap-drugs Bill a World First, Retrieved November 7, 2003, from http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename = thestar/Layout/Article_ Typel &call_pa.geid = 971358637177&c = Article&cid = 1068160209534.
88. Willinsky, J.: 1999. Technologies of Knowing: A Proposal for the Human Sciences, Bacon, Boston.
89. Winner, L.: 1977, Autonomous Technology: Techniques-out-of-Control as a Theme in Political Thought, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
90. Wright, S.: 1986, 'Recombinant DNA Technology and its Social Transformation, 1972-1982', Osiris 2, 303-360.
91. World Trade Organization: 2003, Decision Removes Final Patent Obstacle to Cheap Drug Imports, Retrieved November 7, 2003, from http://www.wto.org/ english/tratop_e/trips_e/trips_e.htm.