Outcome instruments for patellofemoral arthroplasty

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 436, Issue , 2005, Pages 66-70

  Paxton, Elizabeth W ^a   Fithian, Donald C ^a  

^a KAISER PERMANENTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONFERENCE PAPER; EVALUATION; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; PATELLOFEMORAL JOINT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMETRY; RATING SCALE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 21844458986     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000171544.38095.77     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Arciero R, Toomey H: Patellofemoral arthroplasty: A three- to nine-year followup study. Clin Orthop 236:60-71, 1988.
2. Arnbjornsson A, Ryd L: The use of isolated patellar prostheses in Sweden 1977-1986. Int Orthop 22:141-144, 1998.
3. Barber S, Noyes F, Mangine R, McCloskey J, Hartman W: Quantitative assessment of functional limitations in normal and anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees. Clin Orthop 255:204-214, 1990.
4. Bellamy N, Buchanan W, Goldsmith C, Campbell J, Stitt L: Validation study of WOMAC: A health instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 15:1833-1840, 1988.
5. Blazina M, Fox J, Del Pizzo W, Broukhim B, Ivey F: Patellofemoral replacement. Clin Orthop 144:98-102, 1979.
6. Bombardier C, Melfi C, Paul J, et al: Comparison of a generic and a disease-specific measure of pain and physical function after knee replacement surgery. Med Care 33:AS131-AS144, 1995.
7. Cartier P, Sanouiller J, Grelsamer R: Patellofemoral Arthroplasty: 2-12 year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 5:49-55, 1990.
8. Dunbar M, Robertsson O, Ryd L, Lidgren L: Appropriate questionnaires for knee arthroplasty: Results of a survey of 3600 patients from the Swedish Knee arthroplasty Registry. J Bone Joint Surg 836:339-344, 2001.
9. Hefti F, Muller W, Jakob R, Staubli H: Evaluation of knee ligament injuries with the IKDC form. Traumatol Arthroscopy 1:226-234, 1993.
10. Insall J, Dorr L, Scott R, Scott W: Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop 1989:13-4, 1989.
11. Irrgang J, Anderson A, Boland A, et al: Development and Validation of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form. Am J Sports Med 29:600-613, 2001.
12. Irrgang J, Synder-Mackler L, Wainner R, Fu F, Harner C: Development of a patient-reported measure of function of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg 80A:1132-1145, 1998.
13. Konig A, Scheidler M, Rader C, Eulert J: The need for a dual rating system in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 345:161-167, 1997.
14. Kooijman H, Driessen A, Van Horn J: Long term results of patellofemoral arthroplasty: A report of 56 arthroplasties with 17 years of follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg 85B:836-840, 2003.
15. Krajca-Radcliffe J, Coker T: Patellofemoral Arthroplasty: A 2 to 18 year follow-up study. Clin Orthop 330:143-151, 1996.
16. Kreibich D, Vaz M, Bourne R, et al: What is the best way of assessing outcome after total knee replacement? Clin Orthop 331:221-225, 1996.
17. Lingard E, Katz J, Wright R, Wright E, Sledge C: Validity and responsiveness of the Knee Society Clinical Rating System in comparison with the SF-36 and WOMAC. J Bone Joint Surg 83A:1856-1864, 2001.
18. Marx R, Jones E, Answorth A, et al: Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of four knee outcome scales for athletic patients. J Bone Joint Surg 83A:1459-1469, 2001.
19. Paxton E, Fithian D, Stone M, Silva P: The reliability and validity of knee-specific and general health instruments in assessing acute patellar dislocation outcomes. Am J Sports Med 31:487-492, 2003.
20. Roos E, Roos H, Lohmander L, Ekdahl C, Beynnon B: Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)-Development of a self-administered outcome measure. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 78:88-96, 1998.
21. Roos E, Toksvig-Larsen S: Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)-validation and comparison to the WOMAC in total knee replacement. Health Qual Life Outcomes 1-17, 2003.
22. Tegner Y, Lysholm J: Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop 198:43-49, 1985.
23. Ware J, Kosinski M, Keller S: A 12-item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 34:220-230, 1996.
24. Ware J, Sherbourne C: The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). Conceptual Framework and Item Selection. Med Care 30:473-483, 1992.
25. Windsor R, Insall J, Warren R: The Hospital for Special Surgery knee ligament rating form. Am J Knee Surg 1:140-145, 1988.