Installation of telerobotic surgery and initial experience with telerobotic radical prostatectomy

BJU International

Volumn 96, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 34-38

  Costello, Anthony J ^a   Haxhimolla, Hodo ^b   Crowe, Helen ^b   Peters, Juutin S ^b  

^a ROYAL MELBOURNE HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Da Vinci system; Outcome; Radical prostatectomy; Telerobotic

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; CADAVER; CANCER LOCALIZATION; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; NONHUMAN; OPERATION DURATION; PATHOLOGY; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; ROBOTICS; SAFETY; SEXUAL FUNCTION; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SURGICAL TRAINING; SWINE; TELEROBOTIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; URINARY TRACT FUNCTION;

AGED; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPES; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; ROBOTICS; SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 21744437988     PISSN: 14644096     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05562.x     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Herrell SD, Smith JA. Laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy: what are the real advantages? BJU Int 2005; 95: 3-4
2. Ahlering TE, Skarecky D, Lee D, Clayman RV. Successful transfer of open surgical skills to a laparoscopic environment using a robotic interface: Initial experience with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2003; 170: 1738-41
3. Steers WD, LeBeau S, Cardella J, Fulmer B. Establishing a robotics program. Urol Clin 2004; 31: 773-80
4. Challacombe BJ, Kavoussi LR, Dasgupta P. Trans-oceanic telerobotic surgery. BJU Int 2003; 92: 678-80
5. Guillonneau B, Vallancien G. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: The Montsouris technique. J Urol 2000; 163: 1643-9
6. Guillonneau B, El-Fettouh H, Baumert H et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Oncological evaluation after 1,000 cases at Montsouris Institute. J Urol 2003; 169: 1261-6
7. Menon M, Tewari A. Vattikuti Institute Prostatectomy Team. Robotic radical prostatectomy and the Vattikuti Urology Institute technique: an interim analysis of results and technical points. Urology 2003; 61 (Suppl. 1): 15-20
8. Tewari A, Srivasatava A, Menon M. A prospective comparison of radical retropubic and robot-assisted prostatectomy: experience in one institution. BJU Int 2003; 92: 205-10
9. Thomas K, Slabaugh JR, Marshall F. A comparison of minimally invasive open and laparoscopic radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol 2004; 172: 2546-8
10. Wieder JA, Soloway MS. Incidence, etiology, location, prevention and treatment of positive surigical margins after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Urol 1998; 160: 299-315
11. Stolzenburg JU, Do M, Rabenalt R et al. Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: initial experience after 70 procedures. J Urol 2003; 169: 2066-71
12. Rassweiler J, Zeeman O, Schulze M, Tebr D, Hatzinger M, Frede T. Laparoscopic versus open radical prostatectomy: a comparative study at a single institution. J Urol 2003; 169: 1689-93
13. Lanfranco AR, Castellanos AE, Jaydev MD, Desai P, Meyers MD. Robotic surgery: a current perspective. Ann Surg 2004; 239: 14-21
14. Darzi A, Mackay S. Recent advances in minimal access surgery. BMJ 2002; 324: 31-4
15. Balaji KC, Yohannes P, McBridge CL, Oleynikov D, Hemstreet GP. Feasibility of robot-assisted totally intracorporeal laparoscopic ileal conduit urinary diversion: Initial results of a single institutional pilot study. Urology 2004; 63: 51-5