Robotic radical prostatectomy and the Vattikuti Urology Institute technique: An interim analysis of results and technical points

Urology

Volumn 61, Issue 4 SUPPL. 1, 2003, Pages 15-20

  Menon, Mani ^a   Tewari, Ashutosh ^b   Hemal, Ashok ^b   Dasari, Ram ^b   Peabody, James ^b   Sarle, Richard ^b   Shrivastava, Alok ^b   Vershave, Kathleen ^b   Welkes, Nancy ^b   Baize, Brad ^b  

^a HENRY FORD HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; BODY MASS; CANCER STAGING; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMORBIDITY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS; DEMOGRAPHY; FOLLOW UP; HERNIA; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; ILEUS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; ORGAN SIZE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATE SURGERY; RACE; ROBOTIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; SEXUAL FUNCTION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SYMPTOM; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URINARY DYSFUNCTION; VATTIKUTI INSTITUTE PROSTATECTOMY;

EID: 0037377692     PISSN: 00904295     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0090-4295(03)00116-X     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Menon M., Shrivastava A., Tewari A., et al. Laparoscopic and robot assisted radical prostatectomy establishment of a structured program and preliminary analysis of outcomes. J Urol. 168:2002;945-949.
2. Menon M., Tewari A., Baize B., et al. Prospective comparison of radical retropubic prostatectomy and robot-assisted anatomic prostatectomy the Vattikuti Urology Institute experience. Urology. 60:2002;864-868.
3. Tewari A., Peabody J., Sarle R., et al. Technique of da Vinci robot-assisted anatomic radical prostatectomy. Urology. 60:2002;569-572.
4. Wei J.T., Dunn R.L., Litwin M.S., et al. Development and validation of the expanded prostate cancer index composite (EPIC) for comprehensive assessment of health-related quality of life in men with prostate cancer. Urology. 56:2000;899-905.
5. Day D., Ambegaonkar A., Harriot K., et al. A new tool for predicting erectile dysfunction. Adv Ther. 18:2001;131-139.
6. Namasivayam S., Minhas S., Brooke J., et al. The evaluation of sexual function in men presenting with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia. Br J Urol. 82:1998;842-846.
7. Guillonneau B., Rozet F., Cathelineau X., et al. Perioperative complications of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy the Montsouris 3-year experience. J Urol. 167:2002;51-56.
8. Ohori M., Wheeler T.M., Kattan M.W., et al. Prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens. J Urol. 154:1995;1818-1824.
9. SAS/STAT(R) SII: Users Guide. Cary, NC, SAS Institute, 1999.
10. Tewari A., Peabody J., Menon M. An anatomic map to assist identification of the neurovascular bundle during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Hemal A. Recent trends in laparoscopic urology. 2002;297-304 BI Churchill Livingstone, New Delhi.
11. Epstein J.I. Pathologic assessment of the surgical specimen. Urol Clin North Am. 28:2001;567-594.
12. Abbou C.C., Salomon L., Hoznek A., et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy preliminary results. Urology. 55:2000;630-634.
13. Guillonneau B., Cathelineau X., Doublet J.D., et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy assessment after 550 procedures. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 43:2002;123-133.
14. Rassweiler J., Sentker L., Seemann O., et al. Heilbronn laparoscopic radical prostatectomy technique and results after 100 cases. Eur Urol. 40:2001;54-64.
15. Catalona W.J., Carvalhal G.F., Mager D.E., et al. Potency, continence and complication rates in 1,870 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomies. J Urol. 162:1999;433-438.
16. D'Amico A.V., Whittington R., Malkowicz S.B., et al. Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy or external beam radiation therapy for patients with clinically localized prostate carcinoma in the prostate specific antigen era. Cancer. 95:2002;281-286.
17. Gerber G.S., Thisted R.A., Chodak G.W., et al. Results of radical prostatectomy in men with locally advanced prostate cancer multi-institutional pooled analysis. Eur Urol. 32:1997;385-390.
18. Gerber G.S., Thisted R.A., Scardino P.T., et al. Results of radical prostatectomy in men with clinically localized prostate cancer. JAMA. 276:1996;615-619.
19. Han M., Partin A., Pound C., et al. Long-term biochemical disease-free and cancer-specific survival following anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy the 15-year Johns Hopkins experience. Urol Clin North Am. 28:2001;555-565.
20. Han M., Partin A.W., Piantadosi S., et al. Era specific biochemical recurrence-free survival following radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer. J Urol. 166:2001;416-419.
21. Hull G.W., Rabbani F., Abbas F., et al. Cancer control with radical prostatectomy alone in 1,000 consecutive patients. J Urol. 167:2002;528-534.
22. Lepor H. Radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urol Clin North Am. 28:2001;509-519.
23. Lepor H., Nieder A.M., Ferrandino M.N. Intraopera-tive and postoperative complications of radical retropubic prostatectomy in a consecutive series of 1,000 cases. J Urol. 166:2001;1729-1733.
24. Walsh P.C. Risk of positive margins and biochemical recurrence in relation to nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 168:2002;1641.
25. Walsh P.C. Variations in morbidity after radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 168:2002;1642.
26. Walsh P.C., Marschke P., Ricker D., et al. Patient-reported urinary continence and sexual function after anatomic radical prostatectomy. Urology. 55:2000;58-61.