Beyond philanthropy: Community enterprise as a basis for corporate citizenship

Journal of Business Ethics

Volumn 58, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 327-344

  Tracey, Paul ^a   Phillips, Nelson ^b   Haugh, Helen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Community enterprise; Corporate legitimacy; Corporate social responsibility; Local accountability; Partnership; Resource dependency; Social enterprise; Stakeholder engagement

Indexed keywords

EID: 21644477314     PISSN: 01674544     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-004-6944-x     Document Type: Review

References (50)

1. Adams, C. A., W. Hill and C. B. Roberts: 1998, 'Corporate Social Reporting Practices in Western Europe: Legitimating Corporate Behaviour', British Accounting Review 30(1), 1-21.
2. Alexander, L.: 1997, 'The New Mission for Philanthropy', Policy Review 85 (September-October).
3. Amin, A., A. Cameron and R. Hudson: 2002, Placing the Social Economy (Routledge, London).
4. Andriof, J. and S. Waddock: 2002, 'Unfolding Stakeholder Engagement', in J. Andriof, S. Waddock, B. Husted and S. Sutherland (eds.), Unfolding Stakeholder Thinking: Theory, Responsibility and Engagement (Greenleaf Publishing, Sheffield).
5. Boschee, J.: 2001, 'Eight Basic Principles for Nonprofit Entrepreneurs', Nonprofit. World (July-August), 15-18.
6. Bowen, H. R.: 1953, Social Responsibilities of the Businessman (Harper & Row, New York).
7. Brammer, S. and A. Millington: 2003, 'The Effect of Stakeholder Preferences, Organizational Structure and Industry Type on Corporate Community Involvement', Journal of Business Ethics 45(3), 213-226.
8. Christensen, J.: 2004, 'Asking Do-Gooders to Prove they Do Good', New York Times, January 3.
9. Clark, G. L. and T. Hebb: 2004, 'Understanding Pension Fund Corporate Engagement in a Global Arena', Relations Industrielles-Industrial Relations 59, 142-169.
10. Clarkson, M. E.: 1995, 'A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance', Academy of Management Review 20(1), 92-117.
11. Cooke, B. and U. Kothari: 2001, Participation: The New Tyranny? (Zed Books, London).
12. Cornwall, A.: 1998, 'Gender, Participation and the Politics of Difference', in I. Guijt and M. Shah (eds.), The Myth of Community: Gender Issues in Participatory Development (IT Publications, London).
13. Davis, K.: 1973, 'The Case for and Against Business Assumption of Social Responsibilities', Academy of Management Journal 16(2), 312-322.
14. Department of Trade and Industry: 2003a, Enterprise for Communities: Proposals for a Community Interest Company (DTI, London).
15. Department of Trade and Industry: 2003b, Working Paper: The Community Interest Test (DTI, London).
16. Diamond, L.: 1996, 'Toward Democratic Consolidation', in L. Diamond and M. Plattner (eds.), The Global Resurgence of Democracy, 2nd edition (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore).
17. Eells, R. and C. Walton: 1961, Conceptual Foundations of Business (Richard D. Irwin, Homewood, IL).
18. Esrock, S. L. and G. B. Leichty: 1998, 'Social Responsibility and Corporate Web Pages: Self-presentation or Agenda Setting?' Public Relations Review 24(3), 305-319.
19. Galbraith, J. K.: 1967, The New Industrial State (Houghton Mifflin, Boston).
20. Gibson, K.: 2000, 'The Moral Basis of Stakeholder Theory', Journal of Business Ethics 26(3), 245-257.
21. Guijt, I. and M. Shah: 1998, The Myth of Community: Gender Issues in Participatory Development (IT Publications, London).
22. Hess, D., N. Rogovsky and T. W. Dunfee: 2002, 'The Next Wave of Corporate Community Involvement: Corporate Social Initiatives', California Management Review 44(2), 110-125.
23. Hooghiemstra, R.: 2000, 'Corporate Communication and Impression Management - New Perspectives Why Companies Engage in Corporate Social Reporting', Journal of Business Ethics, 27(1/2), 55-68.
24. Husted, B. W.: 2003, 'Governance Choices for Corporate Social Responsibility: to Contribute, Collaborate or Internalize?', Long Range Planning 36, 481-498.
25. Friedman, M.: 1962, Capitalism and Freedom (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).
26. Kanter, R. M.: 1989, 'Becoming PALs: Pooling, Allying and Linking Across Companies', Academy of Management Executive 3(3), 183-193.
27. Kasemir, B. and A. Süess: 2002, 'Sustainability Information and Pension Fund Investment', Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs (BCSIA) Discussion Paper 2002-13 (Environment and Natural Resources Program, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA).
28. Kovach, H., C. Neligan and S. Burall: 2003, The Global Accountability Report (One World Trust, London).
29. Lave, J. and E. Wenger: 1991, Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
30. Levitt, T.: 1958, 'The Dangers of Social Responsibility', Harvard Business Review 36(5), 41-50.
31. Litz, R. A.: 1996, 'A Resource Based View of the Socially Responsible Firm: Stakeholder Interdependence, Ethical Awareness and Issue Responsiveness as Strategic Assets', Journal of Business Ethics 15(12), 1355-1363.
32. McGuire, J. W.: 1963, Business and Society (McGraw-Hill, New York).
33. Maignan, I. and D. A. Ralston: 2002, 'Corporate Social Responsibility in Europe and the U. S.: Insights from Businesses' Self-presentations', Journal of International Business Studies 33(3), 497-514.
34. Marsden, C. and J. Andriof: 1998, 'Towards an Understanding of Corporate Citizenship and How to Influence it', Citizenship Studies 2(2), 329-352.
35. Matten, D., A. Crane, and W. Chapple: 2003, 'Behind the Mask: Revealing the True Face of Corporate Citizenship', Journal of Business Ethics 45(1), 109-120.
36. National Council for Voluntary Organisations: 2003, Response to the DTI Proposals for a Community Interest Company (NCVO, London).
37. Paton, R.: 2003, Managing and Measuring Social Enterprises (Sage, London).
38. Pearce, J.: 2003, Social Enterprise in Anytown (Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation, London).
39. Pinkston, T. S. and A. B. Carroll: 1996, 'A Retrospective Examination of CSR Orientations: Have They Changed?', Journal of Business Ethics 15(2), 199-206.
40. Preston, L. and J. Post: 1975, Private Management and Public Policy: the Principle of Public Responsibility (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).
41. Porter, M. E. and M. R. Kramer: 2002, 'The Competitive Advantage of Corporate Philanthropy', Harvard Business Review 80(12), 56-68.
42. Schlusberg, M. D.: 1969, 'Corporate Legitimacy and Social Responsibility: the Role of Law', California Management Review 12(1), 65-76.
43. Sethi, S. P: 1975, 'Dimensions of Corporate Social Performance', California Management Review 17(3), 58-64.
44. Smith, N. C.: 2003, 'Corporate Social Responsibility: Nor Whether, But How?', Centre for Marketing Working Paper 03-701 (London Business School, London).
45. Stern, R. N. and S. R. Barley: 1996, 'Organizations and Social Systems: Organization Theory's Neglected Mandate', Administrative Science Quarterly 41(1), 146-162.
46. Stiglitz, J.: 2002, Globalization and its Discontents (Penguin Books, London).
47. Swanson, D. L.: 1995, 'Addressing a Theoretical Problem by Reorienting the Corporate Social Performance Model', Academy of Management Review 20(1), 43-64.
48. Waddock, S. and M. Boyle: 1995, 'The Dynamics of Change in Corporate Community Relations', California Management Review 37(4), 125-140.
49. Williamson, O. E.: 1985, The Economic Institutions of Capitalism (The Free Press, New York).
50. Wood, D. J.: 1991, 'Corporate Social Performance Revisited', Academy of Management Review 16(4), 691-718.