Conditional motor learning in the nonspatial domain: Effects of errorless learning and the contribution of the fornix to one-trial learning

Behavioral Neuroscience

Volumn 119, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 662-676

  Brasted, Peter J ^a   Bussey, Timothy J ^a,b   Murray, Elisabeth A ^a   Wise, Steven P ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH   (United States)

^b UK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Arbitrary mapping; Associative learning; Hippocampus; Learning curve; Medial temporal lobe

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BRAIN FORNIX; CONTROLLED STUDY; HIPPOCAMPUS; MACACA; MALE; NONHUMAN; RHESUS MONKEY; STATE DEPENDENT LEARNING; SUBICULUM;

ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; BRAIN MAPPING; CONDITIONING (PSYCHOLOGY); FORNIX (BRAIN); HAPLORHINI; LEARNING; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SPACE PERCEPTION; SPATIAL BEHAVIOR; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 21644455624     PISSN: 07357044     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0735-7044.119.3.662     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Aigner, T. G., & Mishkin, M. (1993). Scopolamine impairs recall of one-trial stimulus-reward association in monkeys. Behavioural Brain Research, 54, 133-136.
2. Alvarez, P., & Squire, L. R. (1994). Memory consolidation and the medial temporal lobe: A simple network model. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 91, 7041-7045.
3. Barefoot, H. C., Baker, H. F., & Ridley, R. M. (2000). Synergistic effects of unilateral immunolesions of the cholinergic projections from the basal forebrain and contralateral ablations of the inferotemporal cortex and hippocampus in monkeys. Neuroscience, 98, 243-251.
4. Barefoot, H. C., Baker, H. F., & Ridley, R. M. (2002). Crossed unilateral lesions of temporal lobe structures and cholinergic cell bodies impair visual conditional and object discrimination learning in monkeys. European Journal of Neuroscience, 15, 507-516.
5. Baxter, M. G., & Murray, E. A. (2001). Opposite relationship of hippocampal and rhinal cortex damage to delayed nonmatching-to-sample deficits in monkeys. Hippocampus, 11, 61-71.
6. Brasted, P. J., Bussey, T. J., Murray, E. A., & Wise, S. P. (2002). Fornix transection impairs conditional visuomotor learning in tasks involving nonspatially differentiated responses. Journal of Neurophysiology, 87, 631-633.
7. Brasted, P. J., Bussey, T. J., Murray, E. A., & Wise, S. P. (2003a, November), Bilateral excitotoxic hippocampal lesions do not impair nonspatial conditional visuomotor learning in a task sensitive to fornix transection. Slide session presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Neuroscience (Program No. 129.4). Retrieved from http://sfn.scholarone.com/itin2003/index. html
8. Brasted, P. J., Bussey, T. J., Murray, E. A., & Wise, S. P. (2003b). Role of the hippocampal system in associative learning beyond the spatial domain. Brain, 126, 1202-1223.
9. Brasted, P. J., & Wise, S. P. (2004). Comparison of learning-related neuronal activity in the dorsal premotor cortex and striatum. European Journal of Neuroscience, 19, 721-740.
10. Broadbent, N. J., Squire, L. R., & Clark, R. E. (2004). Spatial memory, recognition memory, and the hippocampus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 101, 14515-14520.
11. Buckley, M. J., Charles, D. P., Browning, P. G., & Gaffan, D. (2004). Learning and retrieval of concurrently presented spatial discrimination tasks: Role of the fornix. Behavioral Neuroscience, 118, 138-149.
12. Bussey, T. J., Wise, S. P., & Murray, E. A. (2001). The role of ventral and orbital prefrontal cortex in conditional visuomotor learning and strategy use in rhesus monkeys. Behavioral Neuroscience, 115, 971-982.
13. Cassel, J. C., Cassel, S., Galani, R., Kelche, C., Will, B., & Jarrard, L. (1998). Fimbria-fornix vs selective hippocampal lesions in rats: Effects on locomotor activity and spatial learning and memory. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 69, 22-45.
14. Charles, D. P., Dickenson, A., & Gaffan, D. (2002, November). Intact object-object learning in an associative mismatch task in monkeys with fornix transection. Slide session presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Neuroscience (Program No. 8.6). Retrieved from http:// sfn.scholarone.com/ itin2002/index.html
15. Charles, D. P., Gaffan, D., & Buckley, M. J. (2004). Impaired recency judgments and intact novelty judgments after fornix transection in monkeys. Journal of Neuroscience, 24, 2037-2044.
16. Chudasama, Y., & Murray, E. A. (2004). Hippocampal lesions in rhesus monkeys disrupt emotional responses but not reinforcer devaluation effects. Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Neuroscience (Program No. 84.8). Retrieved from http://sfn.scholarone .com/itin2004/index. html
17. Clark, R. E., Zola, S. M., & Squire, L. R. (2000). Impaired recognition memory in rats after damage to the hippocampus. Journal of Neuroscience, 20, 8853-8860.
18. Clayton, N. S. (1995). Development of memory and the hippocampus: Comparison of food-storing and nonstoring birds on a one-trial associative memory task. Journal of Neuroscience, 15, 2796-2807.
19. Clayton, N. S., Bussey, T. J., Emery, N. J., & Dickinson, A. (2003). Prometheus to Proust: The case for behavioural criteria for "mental time travel." Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 436-437.
20. Easton, A., & Gaffan, D. (2001). Crossed unilateral lesions of the medial forebrain bundle and either inferior temporal or frontal cortex impair object-reward association learning in rhesus monkeys. Neuropsychologia, 39, 71-82.
21. Easton, A., Ridley, R. M., Baker, H. F., & Gaffan, D. (2002). Unilateral lesions of the cholinergic basal forebrain and fornix in one hemisphere and inferior temporal cortex in the opposite hemisphere produce severe learning impairments in rhesus monkeys. Cerebral Cortex, 12, 729-736.
22. Fortin, N. J., Agster, K. L., & Eichenbaum, H. B. (2002). Critical role of the hippocampus in memory for sequences of events. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 458-462.
23. Gaffan, D. (1994). Scene-specific memory for objects: A model of episodic memory impairment in monkeys with fornix transection. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 6, 305-320.
24. Gaffan, D. (2002). Against memory systems. Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences, 357, 1111-1121.
25. Gaffan, D., & Harrison, S. (1989). A comparison of the effects of fornix transection and sulcus principalis ablation upon spatial learning by monkeys. Behavioural Brain Research, 31, 207-220.
26. Gaffan, D., Parker, A., & Easton, A. (2001). Dense amnesia in the monkey after transection of fornix, amygdala and anterior temporal stem. Neuropsychologia, 39, 51-70.
27. Gaffan, D., Saunders, R. C., Gaffan, E. A., Harrison, S., Shields, C., & Owen, M. J. (1984). Effects of fornix transection upon associative memory in monkeys: Role of the hippocampus in learned action. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 36(B), 1173-1221.
28. Grandmaison, E., & Simard, M. (2003). A critical review of memory stimulation programs in Alzheimers disease. Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 15, 130-144.
29. Hampton, R. R., Buckmaster, C. A., Anuszkiewicz-Lundgren, D., & Murray, E. A. (2004). Method for making selective lesions of the hippocampus in macaque monkeys using NMDA and a longitudinal surgical approach. Hippocampus, 14, 9-18.
30. Kennedy, P. J., & Shapiro, M. L. (2004). Retrieving memories via internal context requires the hippocampus. Journal of Neuroscience, 24, 6979-6985.
31. Kessels, R. P., & de Haan, E. H. (2003). Implicit learning in memory rehabilitation: A meta-analysis on errorless learning and vanishing cues methods. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 25, 805-814.
32. Kixmiller, J. S. (2002). Evaluation of prospective memory training for individuals with mild Alzheimer's disease. Brain and Cognition, 49, 237-241.
33. Malkova, L., & Mishkin, M. (2003). One-trial memory for object-place associations after separate lesions of hippocampus and posterior parahippocampal region in the monkey. Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 1956-1965.
34. McClelland, J. L. (2001). Failures to learn and their remediation: A Hebbian account. In J. L. McClelland & S. Siegler (Eds.), Mechanisms of cognitive development: Behavioral and neural approaches (pp. 97-211). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
35. McClelland, J. L., McNaughton, B., & O'Reilly, R. (1995). Why there are complementary learning systems in the hippocampus and neocortex: Insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory. Psychological Reviews, 102, 419-457.
36. McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1985). Distributed memory and the representation of general and specific information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 159-197.
37. Mitz, A. R., Godschalk, M., & Wise, S. P. (1991). Learning-dependent neuronal activity in the premotor cortex of rhesus monkeys. Journal of Neuroscience, 11, 1855-1872.
38. Miyachi, S., Hikosaka, O., & Lu, X. F. (2002). Differential activation of monkey striatal neurons in the early and late stages of procedural learning. Experimental Brain Research, 146, 122-126.
39. Murray, E. A., Brasted, P. J., & Wise, S. P. (2002). Arbitrary sensory-motor mapping and the life of primates. In L. R. Squire & D. Schacter (Eds.), The Neurobiology of Learning and Memory (pp. 339-348). New York: Guilford Press.
40. Murray, E. A., Davidson, M., Gaffan, D., Olton, D. S., & Suomi, S. (1989). Effects of fornix transection and cingulate cortical ablation on spatial memory in rhesus monkeys. Experimental Brain Research, 74, 173-186.
41. Murray, E. A., & Wise, S. P. (1996). Role of the hippocampus plus subjacent cortex but not amygdala in visuomotor conditional learning in rhesus monkeys. Behavioral Neuroscience, 110, 1261-1270.
42. National Research Council. (1996). Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
43. Nixon, P. D., McDonald, K. R., Gough, P. M., Alexander, I. H., & Passingham, R. E. (2004). Cortico-basal ganglia pathways are essential for the recall of well-established visuomotor associations. European Journal of Neuroscience, 20, 3165-3178.
44. O'Reilly, R. C., & Rudy, J. W. (2000). Computational principles of learning in the neocortex and hippocampus. Hippocampus, 10, 389-397.
45. Parent, M. B., & Baxter, M. G. (2004). Septohippocampal acetylcholine: Involved in but not necessary for learning and memory? Learning & Memory, 11, 9-20.
46. Parker, A., & Gaffan, D. (1997a). The effect of anterior thalamic and cingulate cortex lesions on object-in-place memory in monkeys. Neuropsychologia, 35, 1093-1102.
47. Parker, A., & Gaffan, D. (1997b). Mammillary body lesions in monkeys impair object-in-place memory: Functional unity of the fornix-mammillary system. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 512-521.
48. Parkinson, J. K., Murray, E. A., & Mishkin, M. (1988). A selective mnemonic role for hippocampus in monkeys: Memory for the location of objects. Journal of Neuroscience, 8, 4159-4167.
49. Pasupathy, A., & Miller, E. K. (2005, February 24). Different time courses of learning-related activity in the prefrontal cortex and striatum. Nature, 433, 873-876.
50. Ridley, R. M., Aitken, D. M., & Baker, H. F. (1989). Learning about rules but not about reward is impaired following lesions of the cholinergic projection to the hippocampus. Brain Research, 502, 306-318.
51. Rupniak, N., & Gaffan, D. (1987). Monkey hippocampus and learning about spatially directed movements. Journal of Neuroscience, 7, 2331-2337.
52. Spiegler, B. J., & Mishkin, M. (1981). Evidence for the sequential participation of inferior temporal cortex and amygdala in the acquisition of stimulus-reward associations. Behavioural Brain Research, 3, 303-317.
53. Sziklas, V., & Petrides, M. (2004). Egocentric conditional associative learning: Effects of restricted lesions to the hippocampo- mammillothalamic pathway. Hippocampus, 14, 931-934.
54. Tulving, E. (2001). Episodic memory and common sense: How far apart? Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences, 356, 1505-1515.
55. Wallenstein, G. V., Eichenbaum, H., & Hasselmo, M. E. (1998). The hippocampus as an associator of discontiguous events. Trends in Neurosciences, 21, 317-323.
56. Whishaw, I. Q., & Jarrard, L. E. (1995). Similarities vs. differences in place learning and circadian activity in rats after fimbria-fornix section or ibotenate removal of hippocampal cells. Hippocampus, 5, 595-604.
57. Wiltgen, B. J. (2004). New circuits for old memories: The role of the neocortex in consolidation. Neuron, 44, 101-108.
58. Wirth, S., Yanike, M., Frank, L. M., Smith, A. C., Brown, E. N., & Suzuki, W. A. (2003, June 6). Single neurons in the monkey hippocampus and learning of new associations. Science, 300, 1578.
59. Wise, S. P., & Murray, E. A. (1999). Role of the hippocampal system in conditional motor learning: Mapping antecedents to action. Hippocampus, 9, 101-117.