Of traversals and hybrid spaces: Science in the community

Mind, Culture, and Activity

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 120-142

  Lee, Stuart ^a   Roth, Wolff Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 2142725862     PISSN: 10749039     EISSN: 15327884     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/S1532-7884MCA1002_3     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Bakhtin, M. (1981). From the prehistory of novelistic discourse. In M. Holquist (Ed.), The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M. M. Bakhtin (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans., pp. 41-83). Austin: University of Texas Press
2. Bowker, G. (1997). Lest we remember: Organizational forgetting and the production of knowledge. Retrieved April 26, 2003 from University of California, San Diego, Division of Social Sciences Web site: http://weber.ucsd.edu/gbowker/ forget.html
3. Callon, M., & Law, J. (1995, Spring). Agency and the hybrid collectif. The South Atlantic Quarterly, 94, 481-507
4. Chaiklin, S., & Lave, J. (Eds.). (1993). Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context. New York: Cambridge University Press
5. de Laet, M., & Mol, A. (2000). The Zimbabwe bush pump. Social Studies of Science, 30, 225-264
6. Engeström, Y. (1999). New forms of work and learning. Retrieved April 26, 2003 from the University of Helsinki, Center for Activity Theory and Developmental Work Research Web site: http://www.edu.helsinki.fi/activity/4a.htm
7. Engeström, Y., Brown, K., Engeström, R., & Koistinen, K. (1990). Organizational forgetting: An activity-theoretical perspective. In D. Middleton & D. Edwards (Eds.), Collective remembering (pp. 139-168). London: Sage
8. Garfinkel, H. (1996). Ethnomethodology's program. Social Psychology Quarterly, 59, 5-21
9. Garfinkel, H., & Sacks, H. (1986). On formal structures of practical actions. In H. Garfinkel (Ed.), Ethnomethodological studies of work (pp. 160-193). New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul
10. Goodwin, C. (1995). Seeing in depth. Social Studies of Science, 25, 237-274
11. Granott, N. (1998). Unit of analysis in transit: From the individual's knowledge to the ensemble process. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 5, 42-66
12. Gutierrez, K., Baquedano-Lopez, P.,&Tejeda, C. (1999). Rethinking diversity: Hybridity and hybrid language practices in the third space. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 6, 286-303
13. Harper, R. H. R. (2000). The organisation in ethnography: A discussion of ethnographic fieldwork programs in CSCW. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 9, 239-264
14. Henderson, K. (1995). The political career of a prototype: Visual representation in design engineering. Social Problems, 42,274-299
15. Henderson Creek Project. (1998). Cutthroat trout habitat enhancement proposal for Henderson Creek through Community Park. Central and Northern Saanich, British Columbia, Canada: Author
16. Holzkamp, K. (1991). Societal and individual life processes. In C. W. Tolman & W. Maiers (Eds.), Critical psychology: Contributions to an historical science of the subject (pp. 50-64). New York: Cambridge University Press
17. Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
18. Irwin, A., Dale, A.,&Smith, D. (1996). Science and hell's kitchen: The local understanding of hazard issues. In A. Irwin& B. Wynne (Eds.), Misunderstanding science? The public reconstruction of science and technology (pp. 47-64). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press
19. Kontinen, T. (1999). The activity theoretical approach for studying NGOs in the process of development cooperation. Retrieved April 26, 2003 from the University of Helsinki, Institute of Development Studies Web site: http://www.valt.helsinki.fi/kmi/Julkais/WPt/1999/wp399.htm
20. Latour, B. (1990). Drawing things together. In M. Lynch & S. Woolgar (Eds.), Representation in scientific practice (pp. 19-68). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
21. Latour, B. (1999). Pandora's hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
22. Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press
23. Lave, J. (1993). The practice of learning. In S. Chaiklin&J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context (pp. 3-32). New York: Cambridge University Press
24. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press
25. Law, J., & Mol, A. (1995). Notes on materiality and sociality. Sociological Review, 43, 274-294
26. Lee, S., & Roth, W.-M. (2001a). How ditch and drain become a healthy creek: Re-presentations, translations and agency during the re/design of a watershed. Social Studies of Science, 31, 323-364
27. Lee, S.,&Roth, W.-M. (2001b). Learning science in the community. In W.-M. Roth&J. Désautels (Eds.), Science education as/for sociopolitical action (pp. 37-65). New York: Lang
28. Lee, S.,&Roth, W.-M. (2001c). Monoglossia, heteroglossia, and the public understanding of science: Enriched meanings made in the community. Manuscript submitted for publication
29. Lee, S.,&Roth, W.-M. (in press). Science and the "good citizen": Community-based scientific literacy. Science, Technology and Human Values
30. Lemke,J. (2001).Towardsatheory of traversals. Retrieved April 26,2003fromhttp://www.personal.amich.edu/jaylemke/new.htm
31. Leont'ev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness and personality (M. J. Hall, Trans.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall
32. Middleton, D. (1997). The social organization of conversational remembering: Experience as individual and collective concerns. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 4, 71-85
33. Mol, A., & Law, J. (1994). Regions, networks and fluids: Anaemia and social topology. Social Studies of Science, 24,641-671
34. Moreira, T. (2000). Translation, difference and ontological fluidity. Social Studies of Science, 30, 421-446
35. Pickering, A. (1995). The mangle of practice: Time, agency, and science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
36. Reynolds, S. (1999). Impervious study of the Hagay Creek watershed, GIS analysis. Unpublished manuscript, University of Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
37. Saari, E., & Mettinen, R. (2001). Dynamics of change in research work: Constructing a new research area in a research group. Science, Technology and Human Values, 26, 300-321
38. Scribner, S. (1984). Studying working intelligence. In B. Rogoff&J. Lave (Eds.), Everyday cognition: Development in social context. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
39. Serres, M. (1982). The parasite. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press
40. Shrum, W. (2000). Science and story in development. Social Studies of Science, 30, 95-124
41. Suchman, L. (2000a). Embodied practices of engineering work. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 7, 4-18
42. Suchman, L. (2000b). Organizing alignment: A case of bridge-building. Organization, 7, 311-327
43. Vaughan, D. (1999). The role of the organization in the production of techno-scientific knowledge. Social Studies of Science, 29, 913-943
44. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
45. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press
46. Wynne, B. (1996). Misunderstood misunderstandings: Social identities and public uptake of science. In A. Irwin & B. Wynne (Eds.), Misunderstanding science? The public reconstruction of science and technology (pp. 19-46). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press