Isolation of the choanocyte in the fresh water sponge, Ephydatia fluviatilis and its lineage marker, Ef annexin

Development Growth and Differentiation

Volumn 47, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 243-253

  Funayama, Noriko ^a   Nakatsukasa, Mikiko ^a   Hayashi, Tetsutaro ^a   Agata, Kiyokazu ^a  

^a RIKEN   (Japan)

Author keywords

Annexins; Choanocyte; FACS; Sponge; Stem cells

Indexed keywords

ANNEXIN; EF ANNEXIN; MOLECULAR MARKER; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARCHEOCYTE; ARTICLE; CELL ISOLATION; CELL LINEAGE; CELL TYPE; CHOANOCYTE; CLONE; EF ANNEXIN GENE; EPHYDATIA FLUVIATILIS; EXPRESSED SEQUENCE TAG; FLUORESCENCE; FRESH WATER SPONGE; GENE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE ISOLATION; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN DOMAIN; SPONGE (PORIFERA); STEM CELL;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANIMALS; ANNEXIN A7; ANNEXINS; BASE SEQUENCE; BIOLOGICAL MARKERS; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL LINEAGE; EXPRESSED SEQUENCE TAGS; FLOW CYTOMETRY; MICE; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PORIFERA; PROTEOMICS; STEM CELLS;

ANIMALIA; EPHYDATIA FLUVIATILIS; SPONGILLIDAE;

EID: 21344471493     PISSN: 00121592     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-169X.2005.00800.x     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Brill, B. 1973. Untersuchungen zur Ultrastruktur des choanocyte von Ephydatia fluviatilis L. Zeit Zellforsch 144, 231-245.
2. De Sutter, D. & Van de Vyver, G. 1977. Aggregative properties of different cell types of the fresh-water sponge Ephydatia fluviatilis isolated on ficoll gradients. Wilhelm Roux's Arch. 183, 151-161.
3. Hayes, M. J., Rescher, U., Gerke, V. & Moss, S. E. 2004. Annexin-actin interactions. Traffic 5, 571-576.
4. Höhr, D. 1977. Differenzierungavorgange in der keimenden gemmula von Ephydatiafluviatilis. Wilhelm Roux's Arch. 182, 329-346.
5. King, N. 2004. The unicellular ancestry of animal development. Dev. Cell 7, 313-325.
6. King, N., Hittinger, C. T. & Carroll, S. B. 2003. Evolution of key cell signaling and adhesion protein families predates animal origins. Science 301, 361-363.
7. Pavans de Ceccatty, M., Thiney, Y. & Garrone, R. 1970. Les Bases Ultrastructurales des communications intercellulaires dans les oscules de quelques eponges. Symp. Zool. Soc. Lond. 25, 449-466.
8. Simpson, T. L. 1984. The Cell Biology of Sponges. Springer-Verlag, New York.
9. Tanaka, K. & Watanabe, Y. 1984. Choanocyte differentiation and morphogensis of choanocyte chambers in the fresh-water sponge, Ephydatia fluviatilis, after reversal of developmental arrest caused by hydroxyurea. Zool. Sci. 1, 561-540.
10. Thiery, J. P. 2003. Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions in development and pathologies. Curr. Opin Cell Biol. 15, 740-746.
11. Umesono, Y., Watanabe, K. & Agata, K. 1999. Distinct structural domains in the planarian brain defined by the expression of evolutionary conserved homeobox genes. Dev. Genes Evol. 209, 31-39.
12. Weissenfels, N. 1976. Bau und Function des Susswasserschwamms Ephydatia fluviatilis L. (Porifera) III. Nahrungsaufnahme, Verdauung und Defakation. Zoomorphologie 85, 73-88.
13. Weissenfels, N. 1981. Bau und Function des Susswasserschwamms Ephydatia fluviatilis L. (Porifera) VIII. Die Entstehung und Entwicklung der Kragengeibelkammern und ihre Verbindung mit dem ausfuhrenden Kanalsystem. Zoomorphologie 98, 35-45.
14. Willenz, P. & Van de Vyver, G. 1982. Endocytosis of latex beads by the exopinacoderm in the fresh water sponge Ephydatia fluviatilis: an in vitro and in situ study in SEM and TEM. J. Ultrastruct. Res. 79, 294-306.
15. Wilson, H. V. 1907. On some phenomena of coalescence and regeneration in sponges. J. Exp. Zool. 5, 245-258.
16. Yamagata, A., Kristensen, D. B., Takeda, Y. et al. 2002. Mapping of phosphorylated proteins on two-dimensional polyacrylamide gels using protein phosphatase. Proteomics 2, 1267-1276.