Key innovations, convergence, and success: Macroevolutionary lessons from plant phylogeny

Paleobiology

Volumn 31, Issue 2 SUPPL., 2005, Pages 77-93

  Donoghue, Michael J ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; PALEOBIOLOGY; PHYLOGENY; PLANT;

VIRIDIPLANTAE;

EID: 21344456730     PISSN: 00948373     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1666/0094-8373(2005)031[0077:KICASM]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Andrews, H. N. 1948. Fossil tree ferns of Idaho. Archaeology 1: 190-195.
2. Andrews, H. N., and W. H. Murdy. 1958. Lepidophloios and ontogeny in arborescent lycopods. American Journal of Botany 45:552-560.
3. Bateman, R. M. 1994. Evolutionary-developmental change in the growth architecture of fossil rhizomorphic lycopsids: scenarios constructed on cladistic foundations. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 69:527-597.
4. Bateman, R. M., W. A. DiMichele, and D. A. Willard. 1992. Experimental cladistic analyses of anatomically preserved arborescent lycopsids from the Carboniferous of Euramerica: an essay in paleobotanical phylogenetics. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 79:500-559.
5. Bateman, R. M., P. R. Crane, W. A. DiMichele, P. R. Kenrick, N. P. Rowe, T. Speck, and W. E. Stein. 1998. Early evolution of land plants: phylogeny, physiology and ecology of the primary terrestrial radiation. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 29:263-292.
6. Baum, D. A., and M. J. Donoghue. 2002. Transference of function, heterotopy, and the evolution of plant development. Pp. 52-69 in Q. Cronk, R. Bateman, and J. Hawkins, eds. Developmental genetics and plant evolution. Taylor and Francis, London.
7. Boyce, C. K., and A. H. Knoll. 2002. Evolution of developmental potential and the multiple independent origins of leaves in Paleozoic vascular plants. Paleobiology 28:70-100.
8. Chapman, R. L., M. L. Buchheim, C. F. Delwiche, T. Friedl, V. A. R. Huss, K. G. Karol, L. A. Lewis, J. Manhart, R. M. McCourt, J. L. Olsen, and D. A. Waters. 1998. Molecular systematics of green algae. Pp. 508-540 in D. Soltis, P. Soltis, and J. Doyle, eds. Systematics of plants II. Kluwer Academic, New York.
9. Chase, M. W., D. E. Soltis, P. S. Soltis, P. J. Rudall, M. F. Fay, W. J. Hahn, S. Sullivan, J. Joseph, M. Molvray, P. J. Kores, T. J. Givnish, K. J. Sytsma, and J. C. Pires. 2000. Higher-level systematics of the monocotyledons: an assessment of current knowledge and a new classification. Pp. 3-16 in K. Wilson and D. Morrison, eds. Monocots: systematics and evolution. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, Victoria, Australia.
10. Cichan, M. A. 1986. Conductance of the wood of selected Carboniferous plants. Paleobiology 12:302-310.
11. Cichan, M. A., and T. N. Taylor. 1990. Evolution of cambium in geological time - a reappraisal. Pp. 213-228 in M. Iqbal, ed. The vascular cambium. Wiley, Somerset, U.K.
12. Coddington, J. A. 1994. The role of homology and convergence in studies of adaptation. Pp. 53-78 in P. Eggleton and R. Vane-Wright, eds. Phylogenetics and ecology. Academic Press, London.
13. Conway Morris, S. 1998. The crucible of creation. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
14. Conway Morris, S. 2003. Life's solution: inevitable humans in a lonely universe. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
15. Conway Morris, S., and S. J. Gould. 1998. Showdown on the Burgess shale. [The Challenge by Conway Morris and the Reply by S. J. Gould.] Natural History 107:48-55.
16. Cracraft, J., and M. J. Donoghue, eds. 2004. Assembling the tree of life. Oxford University Press, New York.
17. Delwiche, C. F., R. A. Anderson, D. Bhattacharya, B. D. Mishler, and R. M. McCourt. 2004. Algal evolution and the early radiation of green plants. Pp. 121-137 in Cracraft and Donoghue, 2004.
18. de Queiroz, A. 2002. Contingent predictability in evolution: key traits and diversification. Systematic Biology 51:917-929.
19. Des Marais, D. L., A. R. Smith, D. M. Britton, and K. M. Pryer. 2003. Phylogenetic relationships and evolution of extant horsetails, Equisetum, based on chloroplast DNA sequence data (rbcL and trnL-F). International Journal of Plant Sciences 164:737-751.
20. DiMichele, W. A., and T. L. Phillips. 1985. Arborescent lycopod reproduction and paleoecology in a coal-swamp environment of Late Middle Pennsylvanian age (Herrin Coal, Illinois, USA). Review of Paleobotany and Palynology 44:1-26.
21. Donoghue, M. J. 1989. Phylogenies and the analysis of evolutionary sequences, with examples from seed plants. Evolution 43:1137-1156.
22. Donoghue, M. J. 1992. Homology. Pp. 170-179 in E. Keller and E. Lloyd, eds. Keywords in evolutionary biology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
23. Donoghue, M. J. 2002. Plants. Pp. 911-918 in M. Pagel, ed. Encyclopedia of evolution, Vol. 2. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
24. Donoghue, M. J. 2004. Immeasurable progress on the Tree of Life. Pp. 548-552 in Cracraft and Donoghue, 2004.
25. Donoghue, M. J., and J. A. Doyle. 2000. Demise of the anthophyte hypothesis? Current Biology 10:R106-R109.
26. Donoghue, M. J., and R. H. Ree. 2000. Homoplasy and developmental constraint: a model and an example from plants. American Zoologist 40:759-769.
27. Donoghue, M. J., C. D. Bell, and R. C. Winkworth. 2003. The evolution of reproductive characters in Dipsacales. International Journal of Plant Sciences 164:S453-S464.
28. Doyle, J. A. 1998. Phylogeny of the vascular plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 29:567-599.
29. Doyle, J. A., and M. J. Donoghue. 1986. Seed plant phylogeny and the origin of angiosperms: an experimental cladistic approach. Botanical Review 52:321-431.
30. Eggert, D. A. 1961. The ontogeny of Carboniferous arborescent Lycopsida. Palaeontographica Abteilung B 108B:43-92.
31. Eggert, D. A. 1962. The ontogeny of Carboniferous arborescent Sphenopsida. Palaeontographica 110B:99-127.
32. Eggert, D. A. 1972. Petrified Stigmaria of sigillarian origin from North America. Review of Paleobotany and Palynology 14:85-99.
33. Eggert, D. A., and N. Y. Kanemoto. 1977. Stem phloem of Middle Pennsylvanian Lepidodendron. Botanical Gazette 138:102-111.
34. Feild, T. S., N. C. Arens, J. A. Doyle, T. E. Dawson, and M. J. Donoghue. 2004. Dark and disturbed: a new image of early angiosperm ecology. Paleobiology 30:82-107.
35. Geeta, R. 2003. Variation and diversification in plant evo-devo [book review]. American Journal of Botany 90:1257-1261.
36. Gifford, E. M., and A. S. Foster. 1989. Morphology and evolution of vascular plants, 3d ed. W. H. Freeman, New York.
37. Givnish, T. J. 1997. Adaptive radiation and molecular systematics: issues and approaches. Pp. 1-54 in T. Givnish and K. Sytsma, eds. 1997. Molecular evolution and adaptive radiation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
38. Gould, S. J. 1989. Wonderful life: the Burgess shale and the nature of history. Norton, New York.
39. Gould, S. J. 2002. The structure of evolutionary theory. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
40. Gould, S. J., and E. S. Vrba. 1982. Exaptation - a missing term in the science of form. Paleobiology 8:4-15.
41. Graham, L. E. 1993. Origin of the land plants. Wiley, New York.
42. Heilbuth, J. C. 2000. Lower species richness in dioecious clades. American Naturalist 156:221-241.
43. Hunter, J. P. 1998. Key innovations and the ecology of macroevolution. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 13:31-36.
44. Judd, W. S., C. S. Campbell, E. A. Kellogg, P. F. Stevens, and M. J. Donoghue. 2002. Plant systematics: a phylogenetic approach, 2d ed. Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass.
45. Karol, K. G., R. M. McCourt, M. T. Cimino, and C. F. Delwiche. 2001. The closest living relatives of land plants. Science 294: 2351-2353.
46. Kenrick, P. 2000. The relationships of vascular plants. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 355: 847-855.
47. Kenrick, P, and P. R. Crane. 1997. The origin and early diversification of land plants: a cladistic study. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C.
48. Knoll, A. H., S. W. F. Grant, and J. W. Tsao. 1986. The early evolution of land plants. In T. Broadhead, ed. Land plants: notes for a short course. Studies in Geology 15:45-63. Department of Geology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville.
49. Lankester, E. R. 1870. On the use of the term homology in modern zoology, and the distinction between homogenetic and homoplastic agreements. Annals of the Magazine of Natural History, 4th series, 6:34-43.
50. Mishler, B. D., and S. P. Churchill. 1985. Transition to a land flora: phylogenetic relationships of the green algae and bryophytes. Cladistics 1:305-328.
51. Moore, B. R., K. M. A. Chan, and M. J. Donoghue. 2004. Detecting diversification rate variation in supertrees. Pp. 487-533 in O. Bininda-Emonds, ed. Phylogenetic supertrees: combining information to reveal the tree of life. Kluwer Academic, New York.
52. Nickrent, D., C. L. Parkinson, J. D. Palmer, and R. J. Duff. 2000. Multigene phylogeny of land plants with special reference to bryophytes and the earliest land plants. Molecular Biology and Evolution 17:1885-1895.
53. Niklas, K. J. 1997. The evolutionary biology of plants. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
54. O'Hara, R. J. 1992. Telling the tree: narrative representation and the study of evolutionary history. Biology and Philosophy 7: 135-160.
55. Osborn, H. F. 1905. The ideas and terms of modern philosophical anatomy. Science 21:959-961.
56. Patterson, C. 1982. Morphological characters and homology. Pp. 21-74 in K. Joysey and A. Friday, eds. Problems of phylogenetic reconstruction. Academic Press, London.
57. Phillips, T. L., and W. A. DiMichele. 1992. Comparative ecology and life-history biology of arborescent lycopsids in Late Carboniferous swamps of Euramerica. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 79:560-588.
58. Pryer, K. M., H. Schneider, and S. Magallón. 2004. The radiation of vascular plants. Pp. 138-153 in Cracraft and Donoghue, 2004.
59. Remy, W., P. G. Gensel, and H. Hass. 1993. The gametophyte generation of some early Devonian land plants. International Journal of Plant Sciences 154:35-58.
60. Renzaglia, K. S., R. J. Duff, D. L. Nickrent, and D. J. Garbary. 2000. Vegetative and reproductive innovations of early land plants: implications for a unified phylogeny. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 355:768-793.
61. Rudall, P. J. 1991. Lateral meristems and stem thickening growth in monocotyledons. Botanical Review 57:150-161.
62. Sanderson, M. J. 1998. Reappraising adaptive radiation. American Journal of Botany 85:1650-1655.
63. Sanderson, M. J., and M. J. Donoghue. 1989. Patterns of variation in levels of homoplasy. Evolution 43:1781-1795.
64. Sanderson, M. J., and M. J. Donoghue. 1996. The relationship between homoplasy and confidence in a phylogenetic tree. Pp. 67-89 in M. Sanderson and L. Hufford, eds. Homoplasy and the evolutionary process. Academic Press, San Diego.
65. Sattler, R. 1984. Homology - a continuing challenge. Systematic Botany 9:382-394.
66. Sattler, R. 1991. Process homology: structural dynamics in development and evolution. Canadian Journal of Botany 70:708-714
67. Schneider, H., K. M. Pryer, R. Cranfill, A. R. Smith, and P. G. Wolf. 2002. Evolution of vascular plant body plans: a phylogenetic perspective. Pp. 330-363 in Q. Cronk, R. Bateman, and J. Hawkins, eds. Developmental genetics and plant evolution. Taylor and Francis, London.
68. Soltis, P. S., D. E. Soltis, M. W. Chase, P. K. Endress, and P. R. Crane. 2004. The diversification of flowering plants. Pp. 154-167 in Cracraft and Donoghue, 2004.
69. Stewart, W. N., and G. W. Rothwell. 1993. Paleobotany and the evolution of plants, 2d ed. Cambridge University Press, New York.
70. Tomlinson, P. B. 1995. Non-homology of vascular organization in monocotyledons and dicotyledons. Pp. 589-622 in P. Rudall, P. Cribb, D. Cutler, and C. Humphries, eds. Monocotyledons: systematics and evolution, Vol. II. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, U.K.
71. Tomlinson, P. B., and M. H. Zimmermann. 1969. Vascular anatomy of monocotyledons with secondary growth - an introduction. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 50:159-179.
72. Vamosi, J. C., S. P. Otto, and S. C. H. Barrett. 2003. Phylogenetic analysis of the ecological correlates of dioecy in angiosperms. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 16:1006-1018.
73. Zanis, M. J., D. E. Soltis, P. S. Solits, S. Mathews, and M. J. Donoghue. 2002. The root of the angiosperms revisited. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 99:6848-6853.
74. Zimmermann, W. 1965. Die Telomtheorie. Fischer, Stuttgart.