Homoplasy and developmental constraint: A model and an example from plants

American Zoologist

Volumn 40, Issue 5, 2000, Pages 759-769

  Donoghue, Michael J ^a   Ree, Richard Ri ^b  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33746016349     PISSN: 00031569     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/icb/40.5.759     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Ackerly, D. D. and M. J. Donoghue. 1998. Leaf size, sapling allometry, and Corner's rules: Phylogeny and correlated evolution in maples (Acer). Amer. Nat. 152:767-791.
2. Alberch, P. 1982. Developmental constraints in evolutionary processes. In J. T. Bonner (ed.), Evolution and development, pp. 313-332. Springer Verlag, Berlin.
3. Archie, J. W. 1989. Homoplasy excess ratios: New indices for measuring levels of homoplasy in phylogenetic systematics and a critique of the consistency index. Syst. Zool. 38:253-269.
4. Archie, J. W. 1996. Measures of homoplasy. In M. J. Sanderson and L. Hufford (eds.), Homoplasy. The recurrence of similarity in evolution, pp. 153-188. Academic Press, San Diego.
5. Arthur, W. 1988. A theory of the evolution of development. Wiley-Interscience, New York.
6. Baldwin, B. G., M. J. Sanderson, M. J. Porter, M. F. Wojciechowski, C. S. Campbell, and M. J. Donoghue. 1995. The ITS region of nuclear ribosomal DNA: A valuable source of evidence on angiosperm phylogeny. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 82: 247-277.
7. Brooks, D. R. and E. O. Wiley. 1985. Theories and methods in different approaches to phylogenetic systematics. Cladistics 1:1-11.
8. Coen, E. S. 1996. Floral symmetry. EMBO J. 15: 6777-6788.
9. Conway Morris, S. 1998. The crucible of creation. The Burgess Shale and the rise of animals. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
10. DeBry, R. \V. and N. A. Slade. 1985. Cladistic analysis of restriction endonuclease cleavage maps within a maximum-likelihood framework. Syst. Zool. 34: 21-34.
11. de Queiroz A. and P. H. Wimberger. 1993. The usefulness of behavior for phylogeny estimation: Levels of homoplasy in behavioral and morphological characters. Evolution 47:46-60.
12. de Queiroz, K. 1985. The ontogenetic method for determining character polarity and its relevance to phylogenetic systematics. Syst. Zool. 34:280-299.
13. Donoghue, M. J. 1992. Homology. In E. Fox Keller and E. Lloyd (eds.). Keywords in evolutionary biology, pp. 170-179. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
14. Donoghue, M. J. and J. A. Doyle. 2000. Demise of the anthophyte hypothesis? Curr. Biol. 10:R106R109.
15. Donoghue, M. J. and J. W. Kadereit. 1992. Walter Zimmermann and the growth of phylogenetic theory. Syst. Biol. 41:74-85.
16. Donoghue, M. J., R. H. Rce, and D. A. Baum. 1998. Phylogeny and the evolution of flower symmetry in the Asteridae. trends Plant Sei. 3:311-317.
17. Donoghue, M. J. and M. J. Sanderson. 1992. The suitability of molecular and morphological evidence in reconstructing plant phylogeny. In P. S. Soltis, D. E. Soltis, and J. J. Doyle (eds.). Molecular systematics in plants, pp. 340-368. Chapman and Hall, New York.
18. Donoghue, M. J. and M. J. Sanderson. 1994. Com> plexity and homology in plants. In B. Hall (ed.), limnology. The hierarchical basis of comparative biology, pp. 393-421. Academic Press, San Diego.
19. Endress, P. K. 1998. Antirrhinum and Asteridae-evolutionary changes of floral symmetry. Symp. Sen Soc. Exp. Biol. 53:133-140.
20. Endress, P. K. 1999. Symmetry in flowers: Diversity and evolution. Int. J. Plant Sei. 160:S3-S23.
21. Farris, J. S. 1989. The retention index and the rescaled ' consistency index. Cladistics 5:417-419.
22. Fink, \V. L. 1982. The conceptual relationship between ontogeny and phylogeny. Paleobiology 8:254264.
23. Foster, S. A., W. A. Cresko, K. P. Johnson, M. U. Tlusty, and H. E. Willmott. 1996. Patterns of homoplasy in behavioral evolution. In M. J. Sanderson and L. Hufford (eds.), Homoplasy, The recurrence of similarity in evolution, pp. 245-269. Academic Press, San Diego.
24. Givnish, T. J. and K. J. Sytsma. 1997n. Consistency, characters, and the likelihood of correct phylogenetic inference. Mol. Phyl. Evol. 7:320-330.
25. Givnish, T. J. and K. J. Sytsma. 19976. Homoplasy in molecular vs. morphological data: The likelihood of correct phylognetic inference. In T. Givnish and K. Sytsma (eds.). Molecular evolution and adaptive radiation, pp. 55-101. Cambridge University Press, New York.
26. Goloboff, P. A. 1991. Homoplasy and the choice among cladograms. Cladistics 7:215-232.
27. Could, S. J. 1989. Wonderful life. The Burgess Shale and the nature of history. W. W. Norton, New York.
28. Hauser, D. L. and G. Boyajian. 1997. Proportional change and patterns of homoplasy: Sanderson and Donoghue revisited. Cladistics 13:97-100.
29. Hennig, W. 1966. Phylogenetic systematics. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, Illinois.
30. Jansen, R. K., J. L. Wee, and D. Millie. 1998. Comparative utility of chloroplast DNA restriction site and DNA sequence data for phylogenetic studies in plants. In P. S. Soltis, D. E. Soltis, and J. J. Doyle (eds.). Molecular Systematics of Plants II: DNA sequencing, pp. 87-100. Kluwer, Boston.
31. Kaufman, S. A. 1993. The origins of order. Oxford University Press, New York.
32. Klassen, G. J., R. D. Mooi, and A. Locke. 1991. Consistency indices and random data. Syst. Zool. 40: 446-457.
33. Kluge, A. G. 1985. Ontogeny and phylogenetic systematics. Cladistics 1:13-27.
34. Kluge, A. G. and J. S. Harris. 1969. Quantitative phyletics and the evolution of anurans. Syst. Zool. 18: 1-32.
35. Kramer, E. M. and V. F. Irish. 1999. Evolution of genetic mechanisms controlling petal development. Nature 399:144-148.
36. Luo, D., R. Carpenter, C. Vincent, L. Copsey, and E. Coen. 1996. Origin of floral asymmetry in Antirrhinum. Nature 383:794-799. \
37. Mabee, P. M. 1989. An empirical rejection of the ontogenetic polarity criterion. Cladistics'5:409-416.
38. Mabee, P. M. 1993. Phylogenetic interpretation of ontogenetic change: Sorting out the actual and the artifactual in an empirical case study of centrarchid fishes. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 107:175-291.
39. Maynard Smith, J., R. Burian, S. Kauffman, P. Alberch, J. Campbell, B. Goodwin, R. Lande, D. Raup, and L. Wolpert. 1985. Developmental constraints and evolution. Quart. Rev. Biol. 60:265287. ;
40. McShea, D. W. 1996. Complexity and homoplasy. In M. J. Sanderson and L. Hufford (eds.), Homoplasy. The recurrence of similarity in evolution, pp. 207-225. Academic Press, San Diego.
41. Meier, R., P. Kores, and S. Darwin. 1991. Homoplasy slope ratio: A better measurement of observed homoplasy in cladistic analyses. Syst. Zool. 40:7488.
42. Meyer, A. 1999. Homology and homoplasy: The retention of genetic programmes. In G. Bock (ed.), Homology, pp. 141-157, Wiley and Sons, New York.
43. Nelson, G. 1978. Ontogeny, phylogeny, paleontology, and the biogenetic law. Syst. Zool. 27:324-345.
44. Olmstead, R. G., P. A. Reeves, and A. C. Yen. 1998. Patterns of sequence evolution and implications for parsimony analysis of chloroplast DNA. In P. S. Soltis, D. E. Soltis, and J. J. Doyle (eds.), Molecular systentalics of plants II: DNA sequencing, pp. 164-187. Kluwer, Boston.
45. Patterson, C. 1982. Morphological characters and homology. In K. A. Joysey and A. E. Friday (eds.), Problems of phylogenetic reconstruction, pp. 2174. Academic Press, London.
46. Ree, R. H. and M. J. Donoghue. 1998. Step matrices and the interpretation of homoplasy. Syst. Biol. 47:582-588.
47. Ree, R. H. and M. J. Donoghue. 1999. Inferring rates of change in flower symmetry in asterid angiosperms. Syst. Biol. 48:633-641.
48. Reeves, P. A. and R. G. Olmstead. 1998. Evolution of novel morphological and reproductive traits in a clade containing Antirrhinum majus (Scrophulariaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 85:1047-1056.
49. Riedl, R. 1978. Onfer in living organisms. Wiley, New York.
50. Rieppel, O. 1985. Ontogeny and the hierarchy of types. Cladistics 1:234-246.
51. Sanderson, M. J. and M. J. Donoghue. 1989. Patterns of variation in levels of homoplasy. Evolution 43: 1781-1795.
52. Sanderson, M. J. and M. J. Donoghue. 1996. The re-v lationship between homoplasy and confidence in a phylogenetic tree. In M. J. Sanderson and L. Hufford (eds.), Homoplasy. The recurrence of similarity in evolution, pp. 67-89. Academic Press, San Diego.
53. Sanderson, M. J. and L. Hufford. (eds.) 1996. Homoplasy. The recurrence of similarity in evolution. Academic Press, San Diego.
54. Sennblad, B. and B. Bremen 2000. Is there a justification for differential a priori weighting in coding . - sequences? A case study from rbcL and Apocynaceae s.l. Syst. Biol. 49:101-113.
55. Wagner, G. P. 1989. The origin of morphological characters and the biological basis of homology. Evolution 43:1157-1171.
56. Wagner, P. J. 2000. Exhaustion of morphological character states among fossil taxa. Evolution 54:365386.
57. Wake, D. B. 1991. Homoplasy: The result of natural selection, or evidence of design limitations? Amer. Nat. 138:543-567.
58. Weston, P. H. 1988. Indirect and direct methods in systcmatics. In C. J. Humphries (ed.), Ontogeny and systematics, pp. 27-56. Columbia University Press, New York.
59. Weston, P. H. 1994. Methods for rooting cladistic trees. In R. W. Scotland, D. J. Sichert, and D. M. Williams (eds.), Models in phytogeny reconstruction, pp. 125-155. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
60. Wimsatt, W. C. 1986. Developmental constraints, generative entrenchment, and the innate-acquired distinction. In W. Bechtel (ed.). Integrating scientific disciplines, pp. 185-208. Martinus-Nijhoff, Dordrecht.
61. Zimmermann, W. 1931. Arbeitsweise der botanischen Phylogentik und anderer Gruppierungswissenschaften. In E. Abderhalden (ed.), Handbuch der biologischen Arbeitsmethoden, Abt. 3, 2, Teil 9. Urban and Schwarzenberg, Berlin.