Moles, weights and potencies: Freedom of expression! [3]

British Journal of Anaesthesia

Volumn 95, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 110-111

  McLeod, G A ^a   Columb, M O ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUPIVACAINE; LEVOBUPIVACAINE; LIDOCAINE; ROPIVACAINE;

BIOEQUIVALENCE; DRUG FORMULATION; DRUG POTENCY; DRUG SOLUTION; LETTER; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RACEMIC MIXTURE;

EID: 21344443895     PISSN: 00070912     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bja/aei568     Document Type: Letter

References (6)

1. Rosenberg PH, Schug SA. Levobupivacaine base and levobupivacaine hydrochloride. Br J Anaesth 2005; 94: 544
2. Lyons G, Columb M, Wilson RC, Johnson RV. Epidural pain relief in labour: potencies of levobupivacaine and racemic bupivacaine. Br J Anaesth 1998; 81: 899-901
3. Columb MO, Lyons G. Determination of the minimum local analgesic concentrations of epidural bupivacaine and lidocaine in labor. Anesth Analg 1995; 81: 833-7
4. 50 motor block after spinal administration. Br J Anaesth 2004; 92: 850-3
5. McLeod GA. Density of spinal anaesthetic solutions of bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, and ropivacaine with and without dextrose. Br J Anaesth 2004; 92: 547-51
6. Benhamou D, Ghosh C, Mercier FJ. A randomized sequential allocation study to determine the minimum effective analgesic concentration of levobupivacaine and ropivacaine in patients receiving epidural analgesia for labor. Anesthesiology 2003; 99: 1383-6