Framing effects in younger and older adults

Journals of Gerontology - Series B Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences

Volumn 60, Issue 4, 2005, Pages

  Kim, Sunghan ^a   Goldstein, David ^a   Hasher, Lynn ^a,b   Zacks, Rose T ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b ROTMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^c MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DECISION MAKING; GERONTOPSYCHIATRY; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 21244476006     PISSN: 10795014     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/geronb/60.4.P215     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bodenhausen, G. V. (1990). Stereotypes as judgmental heuristics: Evidence of circadian variations in discrimination. Psychological Science, 1, 319-322.
2. Educational Testing Service. (1976). Kit of factor-referenced tests. Princeton, NJ: Author.
3. Hertwig, R., Barron, G., Weber, E. U., & Erev, I. (2004). Decisions from experience and the effect of rare events in risky choice. Psychological Science, 15, 534-539.
4. Hess, T. M., Rosenberg, D. C., & Waters, S. J. (2001). Motivation and representational processes in adulthood: The effects of social accountability and information relevance. Psychology and Aging, 16, 629-642.
5. Johnson, M. M. S. (1990). Age differences in decision making: A process-methodology for examining strategic information processing. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 45, P75-P78.
6. Kim, S., & Hasher, L. (2005). The attraction effect in decision making: Superior performance by older adults. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58A, 120-133.
7. Kühberger, A. (1997). Theoretical conceptions of framing effects in risky decisions. In R. Ranyard, W. R. Crozier, & O. Svenson (Eds.), Decision making: Cognitive models and explanations (pp. 128-144). New York: Routledge.
8. Kühberger, A. (1998). The influence of framing on risky decisions: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 75, 23-55.
9. Levin, I. P., Schneider, S. L., & Gaeth, G. J. (1998). All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76, 149-188.
10. Loke, W. H., & Tan, K. F. (1992). Effects of framing and missing information in expert and novice judgment. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 30, 187-190.
11. McElroy, T., & Seta, J. J. (2003). Framing effects: An analytic-holistic perspective. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 610-617.
12. McNeil, B. J., Pauker, S. G., Sox, H. C., Jr., & Tversky, A. (1982). On the elicitation of preferences for alternative therapies. The New England Journal of Medicine, 306, 1259-1262.
13. Roszkowski, M. J., & Snelbecker, G. E. (1990). Effects of "framing" on measures of risk tolerance: Financial planners are not immune. The Journal of Behavioral Economics, 19, 237-246.
14. SAS Institute Inc. (1989). SAS/STAT user's guide, Version 6 (4th ed., vol. 2). Cary, NC: Author.
15. Sieck, W., & Yates, J. F. (1997). Exposition effects on decision making: Choice and confidence in choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 70, 207-219.
16. Takemura, K. (1993). The effect of decision frame and decision justification on risky choice. Japanese Psychological Research, 35, 36-40.
17. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453-458.
18. Wang, X. T., Simons, F., & Brédart, S. (2001). Social cues and verbal framing in risky choice. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 14, 1-15.
19. Yoon, C., May, C. P., & Hasher, L. (1999). Aging, circadian arousal patterns, and cognition. In N. Schwarz, D. C. Park, B. Knauper, & S. Sudman (Eds.), Cognition, aging, and self reports, (pp. 117-143). Hove, England: Psychology Press.