The centipede Strigamia maritima: What it can tell us about the development and evolution of segmentation

BioEssays

Volumn 27, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 653-660

  Arthur, Wallace ^a   Chipman, Ariel D ^b  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND   (Ireland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTHROPOD; CENTIPEDE; DEVELOPMENT; DEVELOPMENTAL GENETICS; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; EVOLUTION; GENE EXPRESSION; HATCHING; INTRASPECIFIC VARIATION; LIFE HISTORY; NATURAL SELECTION; NONHUMAN; PHYLOGENY; REVIEW;

ANIMALS; ARTHROPODS; BODY PATTERNING; EVOLUTION; LIFE CYCLE STAGES;

ANIMALIA; ARTHROPODA; CHILOPODA; GEOPHILOMORPHA; STRIGAMIA; STRIGAMIA MARITIMA;

EID: 21244474830     PISSN: 02659247     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bies.20234     Document Type: Review

References (41)

1. Nüsslein-Volhard C, Wieschaus E. 1980. Mutations affecting segment number and polarity in Drosophila. Nature 287:795-801.
2. Lewis JGE. 1981. The Biology of Centipedes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Manton SM. 1977. The Arthropods: Habits, Functional Morphology and Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Minelli A, Bortoletto S. 1988. Myriapod metamerism and arthropod segmentation. Biol J Linn Soc 33:323-343.
5. Minelli A, Foddai D, Pereira LA, Lewis JGE. 2000. The evolution of segmentation of centipede trunk and appendages. J Zool Syst Evol Research 38:103-117.
6. Borucki H. 1996. Evolution und phylogenetisches system der Chilopoda (Mandibulata, Tracheata). Verh Naturwiss Ver Hamburg 35:95-226.
7. Giribet G, Carranza S, Riutort M, Bagunè J, Ribera C. 1999. Internal phylogeny of the Chilopoda (Myriapoda, Arthropoda) using complete 18S rDNA and partial 28S rDNA sequences. Phil Trans Roy Soc B 354:215-222.
8. Foddai D. 1998. Phylogenetic relationships within geophilomorph centipedes based on morphological characters: a preliminary report. Mem. Mus. civ. Storia Naturale, Verona, 2. serie, sez. Scienze della vita 13:67-68.
9. Foddai D, Minelli A. 2000. Phylogeny of geophilomorph centipedes: old wisdom and new insights from morphology. In: Wytwer J, Golovatch S, editors. Progress in Studies on Myriapoda and Onychophora: Fragmenta Faunistica, 43:61-71. Warsaw, Poland: Polish Academy of Sciences.
10. Kettle C, Arthur W, Jowett T, Minelli A. 1999. Homeotic transformation in a centipede. Trends in Genetics 15:393.
11. Kettle C, Arthur W, Jowett T, Minelli A. 2000. A homeotically-transformed specimen of Strigamia maritima (Chilopoda, Geophilomorpha), and its morphological, developmental and evolutionary implications. In: Wytwer J, Golovatch S, editors. Progress in Studies on Myriapoda and Onychophora. Warsaw: Fragm Faun, 43:105-112.
12. Bateson W. 1894. Materials for the Study of Variation, Treated with Especial Regard to Discontinuity in the Origin of Species. London: Macmillan.
13. Maynard Smith J, Burian R, Kauffman S, Alberch P, Campbell J, et al. 1985. Developmental constraints and evolution. Q Rev Biol 60:265-287.
14. Schwenk K. 1995. A utilitarian approach to evolutionary constraint. Zoology 98:251-262.
15. Arthur W, Farrow M. 1999. The pattern of variation in centipede segment number as an example of developmental constraint in evolution. J Theor Biol 200:183-191.
16. Arthur W. 2004. Biased Embryos and Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (In press).
17. Minelli A, Pasqual C, Etonti G. 1984. I Chilopodi geofilomorfi del gen. Himantarium C.L. Koch con particolare riferimento alle popolazioni Italiane. Lavori - Soc Ven Sc Na 9:73-84.
18. Kettle C, Arthur W. 2000. Latitudinal cline in segment number in an arthropod species, Strigamia maritima. Proc Roy Soc Lond B 267:1393-1397.
19. Lewis JGE. 1962. The ecology, distribution and taxonomy of the centipedes found on the shore in the Plymouth area. J Mar Biol Ass UK 42:655-664.
20. Archey G. 1936. Revision of the Chilopoda of New Zealand. Rec Auck Inst Mus 2:43-70.
21. Misioch M. 1978. Variation of characters in some geophilid chilopods. Abh. Verh. naturwiss. Ver Hamburg 21(22):55-62.
22. Eason EH. 1964. Centipedes of the British Isles. London: Warne.
23. Blower JG. 1957. Feeding habits of a marine centipede. Nature 180:560.
24. Lewis JGE. 1961. The life history and ecology of the littoral centipede Strigamia (Scolioplanes) maritima (Leach). Proc Zool Soc Lond 137:221-248.
25. Kettle C, Johnstone J, Jowett T, Arthur H, Arthur W. 2002. The pattern of segment formation, as revealed by engrailed expression, in a centipede with a variable number of segments. Evol & Dev 5:198-207.
26. Chipman AD, Arthur W, Akam M. 2004. Early development and segment formation in the centipede Strigamia maritima (Geophilomorpha). Evol & Dev 6:78-89.
27. Chipman AD, Arthur W, Akam M. 2004. A double segment periodicity underlies segment formation in centipede development. Current Biology 14:1250-1255.
28. Gregory TR. 2001. Coincidence, coevolution or causation? DNA content, cell size, and the C-value enigma. Biological Reviews 76:65-102.
29. Hughes CL, Kaufman TC. 2002. Exploring the myriapod body plan: expression of the ten Hox genes in a centipede. Development 129:1225-1238.
30. Prunescu C, Capuse I. 1971. Nouvelles données sur le début du développment post-embryonnaire chez les myriopodes de l'ordre Geophilomorpha. Trav Mus Hist Nat "Gr.Antipa" 11:111-119.
31. Eason EH. 1979. The effect of the environment on the number of trunk-segments in the Geophilomorpha with special reference to Geophilus carpophagus Leach. In: Camatini M, editor. Myriapod Biology. New York: Academic Press.
32. Arthur W, Foddai D, Kettle C, Lewis JGE, Luczynski M, Minelli A. 2001. Analysis of segment number and enzyme variation in a centipede reveals a cryptic species, Geophilus easoni sp. nov., and raises questions about speciation. Biol J Linn Soc 74:489-499.
33. Brakefield PM, Gates J, Keys D, Kesbeke F, Wigingaarden PJ, et al. 1996. Development, plasticity and evolution of butterfly eyespot patterns. Nature 384:236-242.
34. Damen WGM, Weller M, Tautz D. 2000. Expression patterns of hairy, even-skipped and runt in the spider Cupiennius salei imply that these genes were segmentation genes in a basal arthropod. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 97:4515-4519.
35. Dearden PK, Donly C, Grbic M. 2002. Expression of pair-rule genes in a chelicerate: early patterning in the two-spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae. Development 129:5461-5472.
36. Davis GK, Jaramillo CA, Patel NH. 2001. Pax group III genes and the evolution of insect pair-rule patterning. Development 128:3445-3458.
37. Sommer RJ, Tautz D. 1993. Involvement of an orthologue of the Drosophila pair-rule gene hairy in segment formation of the short germ-band embryo of Tribolium (Coleoptera). Nature 361:448.
38. Patel NH, Condron BG, Zinn K. 1994. Pair-rule expression patterns of even-skipped are found in both short- and long-germ band beetles. Nature 367:429-434.
39. Maderspacher F, Bucher G, Klingler M. 1998. Pair-rule and gap gene mutants in the flour beetle Tribolium castaneum. Dev Genes Evol 208:558-568.
40. Tautz D. 2004. Segmentation. Dev Cell 7:301-312.
41. Schoppmeier M, Damen WGM. 2005. Expression of Pax III group genes suggests a single-segmental periodicity for opisthosomal segment patterning in the spider Cupiennius salei. Evol & Dev 7:160-169.