Framing the press and the publicity process. A content analysis of meta-coverage in campaign 2000 network news

American Behavioral Scientist

Volumn 46, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 617-641

  Esser, Frank ^a   D'Angelo, Paul ^b  

^a JOHANNES GUTENBERG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 21144454904     PISSN: 00027642     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0002764202238489     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Agranoff, R. (1976). The management of electoral campaigns. Boston: Holbrook.
2. Alter, J. (2000, February 14). A very human hero. Newsweek, pp. 28-34.
3. Altheide, D., & Snow, R. (1991). Media worlds in the post-journalism era. New York: DeGruyter.
4. Ansolabehere, S., Behr, R., & Iyengar, S. (1991). Mass media and elections: An overview. American Politics Quarterly, 19, 109-139.
5. Arterton, C. F. (1984). Media politics. Lexington Books.
6. Barkin, S. M. (1989). Coping with the duality of television news: Comments on Graber. American Behavioral Scientist, 33, 153-156.
7. Bennett, W. L. (1992). The governing crisis: Media, money, and marketing in American elections. New York: St. Martin's.
8. Blumler, J. G. (1990). Elections, the media, and the modern publicity process. In M. Ferguson (Ed.), Public communication: The new imperatives (pp. 101-113). London: Sage Ltd.
9. Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1981). Politicians and the press: An essay on role relationships. In D. D. Nimmo & K. R. Sanders (Eds.), Handbook of political communication (pp. 467-493). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
10. Buchanan, B. (1991). Electing a president: The Markle Commission research on campaign '88. Austin: University of Texas Press.
11. Cappella, J. N., & Jamieson, K. H. (1997). The spiral of cynicism: The press and the public good. New York: Oxford University Press.
12. Carey, J. (1976). How media shape campaigns. Journal of Communication, 26(2), 50-57.
13. Crotty, W., & Jacobson, G. (1980). American parties in decline. Boston: Little, Brown.
14. D'Angelo, P. (1999, May 27). Framing the press: A new approach to assessing the cynical nature of press self-coverage and its implications for information processing. Paper presented at the International Communication Association, San Francisco.
15. D'Angelo, P. (2000, June 13). Repaying the free ride on the Straight Talk Express: Covering John McCain and the media through a strategic haze. Paper presented at the NCA Summer Conference, Washington, D.C.
16. D'Angelo, P. (2002). News framing as a multi-paradigmatic research program: A response to Entman. Journal of Communication, 52(4) 870-888.
17. Davis, R. (1992). The press and American politics: The new mediator. White Plains, NY: Longman.
18. Diamond, E., & Bates, S. (1988). The spot: The rise of political advertising on television (Rev. ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. Entman, R. (1989). Democracy without citizens. New York: Oxford University Press.
20. Entman, R. (1991). Framing U.S. coverage of international news: Contrasts in narratives of the KAL and Iran Air incidents. Journal of Communication, 41(4), 6-27.
21. Esser, F., Reinemann, C., & Fan, D. (2001). Spin doctors in the United States, Great Britain, and Germany: Metacommunication about media manipulation. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 6, 16-45.
22. Fineman, H. (2000, February 14). The McCain mutiny. Newsweek, pp. 22-27.
23. Gamson, W. A. (1989). News as framing: Comments on Graber. American Behavioral Scientist, 33, 157-161.
24. Gitlin, T. (1991). Blips, bytes and savvy talk: Television's impact on American politics. In P. Dahlgren & C. Sparks (Eds.), Communication and citizenship (pp. 119-136). Boston: Routledge Kegan Paul.
25. Graber, D. (1989). Content and meaning: What's it all about? American Behavioral Scientist, 33, 144-152.
26. Hallin, D. C. (1992). Sound bite news: Television coverage of elections, 1968-1988. Journal of Communication, 42, 5-24.
27. Iyengar, S. (1991). Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
28. Jamieson, K. H. (1992). Dirty politics: Deception, distraction, and democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
29. Johnson, T. J., & Boudreau, T. (with Glowaki, C.). (1996). Turning the spotlight inward: How leading news organizations covered the media in the 1992 presidential election. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 73, 657-671.
30. Johnson-Cartree, K. S., & Copeland, G. A. (1997). Inside political campaigns: Theory and practice. New York: Praeger.
31. Kaid, L. L., & Johnston, A. (1991). Negative versus positive television advertising in U.S. presidential campaigns, 1960-1988. Journal of Communication, 41, 57-70.
32. Kerbel, M. R. (1997). The media: Viewing the campaign through a strategic haze. In M. Nelson (Ed.), The elections of 1996 (pp. 81-105). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
33. Kerbel, M. R. (1998). Edited for television: CNN, ABC, and American presidential politics (2nd ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview.
34. Kerbel, M. R. (1999). Remote and controlled: Media politics in a cynical age (2nd ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview.
35. Kerbel, M. R., Apee, S., & Ross, M. (2000). PBS ain't so different: Public broadcasting, election frames, and democratic empowerment. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 5(4), 8-32.
36. Lengle, J. I. (1980). Representation and presidential primaries: The Democratic Party in the post-reform era. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
37. Lichter, R. S., Noyes, R. E., & Kaid, L. L. (1999). Negative news or no news: How the networks nixed the '96 campaign. In L. L. Kaid & D. G. Bystrom (Eds.), The electronic election: Perspectives on the 1996 campaign communication (pp. 3-13). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
38. Marshall, T. R. (1980). Presidential elections in a reform age. New York: Praeger.
39. Neuman, W. R., Just, M. R., & Crigler, A. N. (1992). Common knowledge: News and the construction of political meaning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
40. Nimmo, D., & Savage, R. (1976). Candidates and their images: Concepts, methods, and findings. Santa Monica, CA: Goodyear.
41. Norris, P. (1997). The rise of postmodern political campaigns? In P. Norris (Ed.), Politics and the press: The news media and their influences (pp. 1-17). Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
42. Norris, P. (2001). US campaign 2000: Of pregnant chads, butterfly ballots, and partisan vitriol. Government & Opposition, 35(2), 3-26.
43. Pan, Z., & Kosicki, G. M. (1993). Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse. Political Communication, 10, 55-76.
44. Patterson, T. E. (1980). The mass media election. New York: Praeger.
45. Patterson, T. E. (1993). Out of order. New York: Knopf.
46. Polsby, N. W. (1983). Consequences of party reform. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
47. Sabato, L. (1981). The rise of political consultants: New ways of winning elections. New York: Basic Books.
48. Scheufele, D. A. (1999). Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication, 49, 103-122.
49. Stebenne, D. (1993). Media coverage of American presidential elections: An historical perspective. In M. FitzSimon (Ed.), The finish line: Covering the campaign's final days (pp. 79-91). New York: The Freedom Forum Media Studies Center.
50. Steele, C. A., & Barnhurst, K. (1996). The journalism of opinion: Network news coverage of U.S. presidential campaigns, 1968-1988. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 13(3), 187-209.
51. Stempel, G. H., & Windhauser, J. W. (1991). Newspaper coverage of the 1984 and 1988 campaigns. In G. H. Stempel, III & J. W. Windhauser (Eds.), The media in the 1984 and 1988 presidential campaigns (pp. 13-66). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
52. Tankard, J., & Sumpter, R. (1994). The spin doctor: An alternative model of public relations. Public Relations Reviews; 20, 19-27.
53. Tuchman, G. (1978). Making news. New York: Free Press.
54. van Dijk, T. A. (1988). News as discourse. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
55. Wattenberg, M. P. (1994). The decline of American political parties 1952-1992. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. [blank_line]