Political advertising and information seeking: Comparing exposure via traditional and internet channels

Journal of Advertising

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 27-35

  Kaid, Lynda Lee ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0040076600     PISSN: 00913367     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00913367.2002.10673658     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Andreoli, V. and S. Worchel (1978), “Effects of Media, Communicator and Message Position on Attitude Change, ” Public Opinion Quarterly, 42, 59-70.
2. Ansolabehere, S. and S. Iyengar (1995), Going Negative: How Attack Ads Shrink and Polarize the Electorate, New York: The Free Press.
3. Althaus, S.L. and D. Tewksbury (2000), “Patterns of Internet and Traditional News Media Use in a Networked Community, ” Political Communication, 17, 21-45.
4. Beato, G. (2000), “Learning from the Web, ” Business 2.0, (March), 328-334.
5. Bennett, S.E. (1997), “Why Young Americans Hate Politics and What We Should Do About It, ” PS, 30 (1), 47-53.
6. Berelson, B. (1966), “Democratic Theory and Public Opinion, ” in Reader in Public Opinion and Communication, B. Berelson and M. Janowitz, eds., New York: The Free Press, 489-504.
7. “Bored to the Bone” (1996), Newsweek, (November 11), 38-42.
8. Cassel, C.A. and C.C. Lo (1997), ‘Theories of Political Literacy, ” Political Behavior, 19, 317-335.
9. Cohen, A. (1976), “Radio vs. TV: The Effects of the Medium, ” Journal of Communication, 26, 29-35.
10. Connell, M. (1997), “New Ways to Reach Voters and Influence Public Opinion on the Internet, ” Campaigns and Elections, 18 (8), 64-68.
11. Corrado, A. and C. Firestone, eds. (1996), Elections in Cyberspace: Toward a New Era in American Politics, Washington, DC: Aspen Institute.
12. Cutbirth, C.W. and T. Coombs (1997), ‘The Coming Electronic Democracy: The Internet, Political Communication, and the Duties of Citizenship, ” paper presented at the National Communication Association Convention, (November), Chicago.
13. De Fleur, M.L. and S. Ball-Rokeach (1973), Theories of Mass Communication, 3ded., New York: David McKay Company.
14. Devlin, L.P. (1997), “Contrast in Presidential Campaign Commercials of 1996, ” American Behavioral Scientist, 40, 1058-1084
15. Devlin, L.P. (2001), “Contrast in Presidential Campaign Commercials of 2000, ” American Behavioral Scientist, 44, 2338-2369.
16. Diamond, E. and S. Bates (1992), The Spot: The Rise of Political Advertising on Television, 3d ed., Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. Eveland, W.P. and S. Dunwoody (2001), “User Control and Structural Isomorphism or Disorientation and Cognitive Load? Learning from the Web Versus Print, ” Communication Research, 28, 48-78.
18. Garramone, G., C.K. Atkin, B.E. Pinkleton, and R. Cole (1990), “Effects of Negative Political Advertising on the Political Process '' Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 34, 299-311.
19. Jacques, W.W. and S.C. Ratzan (1997), ‘The Internet’s World Wide Web and Political Accountability: New Media Coverage of the 1996 Presidential Debates, ” American Behavioral Scientist, 40, 1226-1237.
20. Johnson, R.J., M.A. Braima, and J. Sothirajah (1999), “Doing the Traditional Media Sidestep: Comparing the Effects of the Internet and Other Nontraditional Media with Traditional Media in the 1996 Presidential Campaign, ” Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 76, 99-123.
21. Kaid, L.L. (1981), “Political Advertising, ” in Handbook of Political Communication, D. Nimmo and K. Sanders, eds., Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 249-271.
22. Kaid, L.L. (1991), “Ethical Dimensions of Political Advertising, ” in Ethical Dimensions of Political Communication, R. Denton, ed., New York: Praeger, 145-169.
23. Kaid, L.L. (1999), “Political Advertising: A Summary of Research Findings, ” in The Handbook of Political Marketing, B. Newman, ed., Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 423-438
24. Kaid, L.L. and C. Holtz-Bacha (2000), “Gender Differences in Response to Televised Political Broadcasts: A Multicountry Comparison, ” Harvard Journal of International Press/Politics, 5 (2), 17-29.
25. Kaid, L.L., M.S. McKinney, and J. C. Tedesco (2000), Civic Dialogue in the 1996 Presidential Campaign: Candidate, Media, and Public Voices, Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
26. Katz, E. and J. Feldman (1962), 'The Debates in Light of Research: A Survey of Surveys, ” in The Great Debates, S. Kraus, ed., Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 173-223.
27. Kern, M. (1997), “Social Capita] and Citizen Interpretation of Political Ads, News, and Web Site Information in the 1996 Presidential Elections, ” American Behavioral Scientist, 40, 1238-1249.
28. Kern, M. and M. Just (1997), “A Gender Gap Among Viewers?” in Women, Media, and Politics, P. Norris, ed., New York: Oxford University Press, 99-112.
29. Klapper, J. (1960), The Effects of Mass Communication, New York: The Free Press.
30. Leong, E.K.F., X. Huang, and P. J. Stanners (1998), “Comparing the Effectiveness of the Web Site with Traditional Media, ” Journal of Advertising Research, 38 (5), 44-52.
31. Lipset, S.M. and W. Schneider (1987), The Confidence Gap, rev. ed., Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
32. McKeown, C.A. and K.D. Plowman (1999), “Reaching Publics on the Web During the 1996 Presidential Campaign, ” Journal of Public Relations Research, 11, 321-347.
33. McKinney, M.S. and K.C. Gaddie (2000), “The Medium and the Message: TV vs. Internet Viewing of a Presidential Primary Debate, " paper presented at the National Communication Association Convention, (November), Seattle.
34. McKinnon, L.M., J.C. Tedesco, and L.L. Kaid (1993), “The Third 1992 Presidential Debate: Channel and Commentary Effects, ” Argumentation and Advocacy, 30 (Fall), 106-118.
35. McLuhan, M. (1964), Understanding Media, New York: New American Library.
36. McQuail, D. (2000), McQuail's Mass Communication Theory, 4th ed., London: Sage Publications.
37. Milbank, D. (1999), “Virtual Politics, ” The New Republic, (July 5), 22-27.
38. Pearlstein, S. (1996), “Angry Female Voters a Growing Force, ” Washington Post, (January 30), A1-A5.
39. Perloff, R.M. (1998), Political Communication: Politics, Press, and Public in America, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
40. Pinkleton, B.E. and E.W. Austin (1998), “Media and Participation: Breaking the Spiral of Disaffection, ” in Engaging the Public: How the Government and Media Can Reinvigorate Democracy, T.J. Johnson, C.E. Hays, and S.P. Hays, eds., Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 77-86.
41. Rogers, E.M. (1986), Communication Technology, New York: The Free Press.
42. Rosenstone, S.J., D.R. Kinder, W.E. Miller, and The National Election Studies (1997), American National Election Study, 1996: Pre- and Post-Election Survey, computer file, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, Center for Political Studies (producer), Ann Arbor, MI: Interuniversity Consortium for Political and Social Research (distributor).
43. Rumbough, T. and J. Tomlinson (2000), “Internet 2000: Evolution of Internet Content and Effects, ” paper presented at the National Communication Association Convention, (November), Seattle.
44. Shannon, C. and W. Weaver, eds. (1949), The Mathematical Theory of Communication, Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
45. Schunk, D.H. (1996), Learning Theories, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
46. Shettel, H. (1996), “Should the 51% Solution Come with a Caution Label?” Visitor Behavior, 3, 1-5.
47. Sundar, S.S., K.M. Hesser, S. Kalyanaraman, and J. Brown (1998), “The Effect of Website Interactivity on Political Persuasion, ” paper presented at the 21st General Assembly & Scientific Conference of the International Association for Media and Communication Research, (July), Glasgow, UK.
48. Tedesco, J.C. and L.L. Kaid (2000), “Candidate Web Sites and Voter Effects: Investigating Uses and Gratifications, ” paper presented at the National Communication Association Convention, (November), Seattle.
49. Vancil, D.L. and S.D. Pendell (1987), “The Myth of Viewer-Lis-tener Disagreement in the First Kennedy-Nixon Debates, ” Central States Speech Journal, 38, 16-27.
50. “Why Don’t Americans Trust the Government?” (1997), The Washington Post!Kaiser Family Foundation/Harvard University Survey Project, Menlo Park, CA: Henry KaiserFamily Foundation.