Variation in daily floral display and the potential for geitonogamous pollination in two monomorphic enantiostylous Monochoria species

Plant Systematics and Evolution

Volumn 253, Issue 1-4, 2005, Pages 201-207

  Tang, L L ^a   Huang, S Q ^a  

^a WUHAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Floral display; Geitonogamy; Mating system; Monochoria; Monomorphic enantiostyly; Pollination; Pontederiaceae

Indexed keywords

MONOCHORIA; MONOCHORIA KORSAKOWII; MONOCHORIA VAGINALIS; PONTEDERIACEAE;

EID: 20944438005     PISSN: 03782697     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00606-005-0309-5     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Barrett S. C. H. (2002) The evolution of plant sexual diversity. Nat. Rev. Genet. 3: 274-285.
2. Barrett S. C. H., Baker A. M., Jesson L. K. (2000a) Mating strategies in monocotyledons. In: Wilson K. L., Morrison D. (eds.) Monocots systematics and evolution. CSIRO Publishing, Sydney Australia, pp. 258-269.
3. Barrett S. C. H., Jesson L. K., Baker A. M. (2000b) The evolution and function of stylar polymorphisms in flowering plants. Ann. Bot. 85 (Suppl. A): 253-265.
4. Bowers K. A. W. (1975) The pollination ecology of Solanum rostratum (Solanaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 62: 633-638.
5. Dulberger R. (1981) The floral biology of Cassia didymobotrya and C. auriculata (Caesalpiniaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 68: 1350-1360.
6. Fenster C. B. (1995) Mirror image flowers and their effect on outcrossing rate in Chamaecrista fasciculata (Leguminosae). Amer. J. Bot. 82: 46-50.
7. Harder L. D., Barrett S. C. H. (1996) Pollen dispersal and mating patterns in animal- pollinated plants. In: Lloyd D. G., Barrett S. C. H. (eds.) Floral biology. Chapman&Hall, New York, pp. 140-190.
8. Jesson L. K., Barrett S. C. H. (2002a) Solving the puzzle of mirror-image flowers. Nature 417: 407.
9. Jesson L. K., Barrett S. C. H. (2002b). Enantiostyly in Wachendorfia (Haemodoraceae): the influence of reproductive system on the maintenance of the polymorphism. Amer. J. Bot. 89: 253-262.
10. Jesson L. K., Barrett S. C. H. (2003) The comparative biology of mirror-image flowers. Int. J. Plant Sci. 164 (5 Suppl.): S237-S249.
11. Jesson L. K., Barrett S. C. H., Day T. (2003a) A theoretical investigation of the evolution and maintenance of mirror-image flowers. Amer. Naturalist 161: 916-930.
12. Jesson L. K., Kang J., Wagner S. L., Barrett S. C. H., Dengler N. G. (2003b) The developmental basis of enantiostyly. Amer. J. Bot. 90: 183-195.
13. Kohn J. R., Graham S. W., Morton B., Doyle J. J., Barrett S. C. H. (1996) Reconstruction of the evolution of reproductive characters in Pontederiaceae using phylogenetic evidence from chloroplast DNA restriction-site variation. Evolution 50: 1454-1469.
14. Lloyd D. G. (1992) Self- and cross-fertilization in plants. II. The selection of self-fertilization. Int. J. Plant Sci. 153: 370-380.
15. Ornduff R., Dulberger R. (1978) Floral enantiomorphy and the reproductive system of Wachendorfia paniculata (Haemodoraceae). New Phytol. 80: 427-434.
16. Sokal R. R., Rohlf F. J. (1995) Biometry. WH Freeman and Company, New York.
17. Todd J. E. (1882) On the flowers of Solanum rostratum and Cassia chamaecrista. Amer. Naturalist 16: 281-287.
18. Wang G., Miura R., Kusanagi T. (1995) The enantiostyly and the pollination biology of Monochoria korsakowii (Pontederiaceae). Acta Phytotax. Geobot. 46: 55-65.
19. Wang G., Yamasue Y., Itoh K., Kusanagi T. (1998) Outcrossing rates as affected by pollinators and the heterozygote advantage of Monochoria korsakowii. Aquat. Bot. 62: 135-143.
20. Webb C. J., Lloyd D. G. (1986) The avoidance of interference between the presentation of pollen and stigmas in angiosperms. II. Herkogamy. New Zealand J. Bot. 24: 163-178.