A theoretical investigation of the evolution and maintenance of mirror-image flowers

American Naturalist

Volumn 161, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 916-930

  Jesson, Linley K ^a,b   Barrett, Spencer C H ^a   Day, Troy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b VICTORIA UNIVERSITY OF WELLINGTON   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Enantiostyly; Frequency dependent selection; Geitonogamy; Plant sexual polymorphism; Pollen transfer

Indexed keywords

ECOMORPHOLOGY; EVOLUTION; FLOWER; POLLEN; POLYMORPHISM;

EVOLUTION; FLOWER; HISTOLOGY; PHYLOGENY; POLLEN; REPRODUCTION; REVIEW; THEORETICAL MODEL;

EVOLUTION; FLOWERS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PHYLOGENY; POLLEN; REPRODUCTION;

EID: 0038302055     PISSN: 00030147     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/375176     Document Type: Review

References (41)

1. Barrett, S. C. H., ed. 1992. Evolution and function of heterostyly. Springer, Berlin.
2. _. 2002. Sexual interference of the floral kind. Heredity 88:154-159.
3. Barrett, S. C. H., L. K. Jesson, and A. M. Baker. 2000. The evolution and functional significance of stylar polymorphism in flowering plants. Annals of Botany 85(suppl. A):253-265.
4. Bergstrom, C. T., and P. Godfrey-Smith. 1998. On the evolution of behavioural heterogeneity in individuals and populations. Biology and Philosophy 13:205-231.
5. Bowers, K. 1975. The pollination ecology of Solanum rostratum (Solanaceae). American Journal of Botany 62:633-638.
6. Charlesworth, D., and B. Charlesworth. 1979. A model for evolution of distyly. American Naturalist 114:467-498.
7. _. 1987. Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 18:237-268.
8. Darwin, C. 1877. The different forms of flowers on plants of the same species. J. Murray, London.
9. de Jong, T., P. Kinkhamer, and M. Van Staalduinen. 1992. The consequences of pollination biology for selection of mass or extended blooming. Functional Ecology 6:606-615.
10. Dulberger, R. 1981. The floral biology of Cassia didymobotrya and C. auriculata (Caesalpinaceae). American Journal of Botany 68:1350-1360.
11. Dulberger, R., and R. Ornduff. 1980. Floral morphology and reproductive biology of four species of Cyanella (Tecophilaeaceae). New Phytologist 86:45-56.
12. Fenster, C. B. 1995. Mirror-image flowers and their effect on outcrossing rate in Chamaecrista fasciculata (Leguminosae). American Journal of Botany 82:46-50.
13. Fisher, R. A. 1941. Average excess and average effect of a gene substitution. Annals of Eugenics 11:53-63.
14. Graham, S. W., and S. C. H. Barrett. 1995. Phylogenetic systematics of the Pontederiales: implications for breeding-system evolution. Pages 415-441 in P. J. Rudall, P. J. Cribb, D. F. Cutler, and C. J. Humphries, eds. Monocotyledons: systematics and evolution. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
15. Harder, L. D., and S. C. H. Barrett. 1996. Pollen dispersal and mating patterns in animal pollinated plants. Pages 140-190 in D. G. Lloyd and S. C. H. Barrett, eds. Floral biology: studies on floral evolution in animal-pollinated plants. Chapman & Hall, New York.
16. Harder, L. D., and W. G. Wilson. 1998a. A clarification of pollen discounting and its joint effects with inbreeding depression on mating system evolution. American Naturalist 152:684-695.
17. _. 1998b. Theoretical consequences of heterogeneous transport conditions for pollen dispersal by animals. Ecology 79:2789-2807.
18. Harder, L. D., S. C. H. Barrett, and W. W. Cole. 2000. The mating consequences of sexual segregation within infiorescences of flowering plants. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological Sciences 267:315-320.
19. Harrison, C., M. Möller, and Q. C. B. Cronk. 1999. Evolution and development of floral diversity in Streptocarpus and Saintpaulia. Annals of Botany 84:49-60.
20. Hopper, S. D., M. F. Fay, M. Rossetto, and M. W. Chase. 1999. A molecular phylogenetic analysis of the blood-root and kangaroo paw family, Haemodoraceae: taxonomic, biogeographic and conservation implications. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 131:285-299.
21. Iwasa, Y., T. J. de Jong, and P. G. L. Klinkhamer. 1995. Why pollinators visit only a fraction of the open flowers on a plant: the plant's point of view. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 8:439-453.
22. Jesson, L. K. 2002. The evolution and functional significance of enantiostyly in flowering plants. Ph.D. thesis. University of Toronto.
23. Jesson, L. K., and S. C. H. Barrett. 2002a. Enantiostyly in Wachendorfia (Haemodoraceae): the influence of reproductive systems on the maintenance of the polymorphism. American Journal of Botany 89:253-263.
24. _. 2002b. The genetics of mirror-image flowers. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, Biological Sciences 269:1835-1839.
25. _. 2002c. Solving the puzzle of mirror-image flowers. Nature 417:707.
26. Jesson, L. K., J. Kang, S. L. Wagner, S. C. H. Barrett, and N. G. Dengler. 2003. The development of enantiostyly. American Journal of Botany 90:183-195.
27. Knuth, P. 1906. Handbook of flower pollination. Clarendon, Oxford.
28. Kohn, J. R., and S. C. H. Barrett. 1992. Experimental studies on the functional significance of heterostyly. Evolution 46:43-55.
29. Lloyd, D. G. 1992. Self- and cross-fertilization in plants. II. The selection of self-fertilization. International Journal of Plant Sciences 153:370-380.
30. Lloyd, D. G., and C. J. Webb. 1986. The avoidance of interference between the presentation of pollen and stigmas in angiosperms. I. Dichogamy. New Zealand Journal of Botany 24:135-162.
31. _. 1992a. The evolution of heterostyly. Pages 151-178 in S. C. H. Barrett, ed. Evolution and function of heterostyly. Springer, Berlin.
32. _. 1992b. The selection of heterostyly. Pages 179-208 in S. C. H. Barrett, ed. Evolution and function of heterostyly. Springer, Berlin.
33. Luo, D., R. Carpenter, L. Copsey, C. Vincent, J. Clark, and E. Coen. 1999. Control of organ asymmetry in flowers of Antirrhinum. Cell 99:367-376.
34. Olmstead, R. G., and J. D. Palmer. 1997. Implications for the phylogeny, classification, and biogeography of Solanum from cpDNA restriction site variation. Systematic Botany 22:19-29.
35. Ornduff, R. 1974. Heterostyly in South African flowering plants: a conspectus. Journal of South African Botany 40:169-187.
36. Ornduff, R., and R. Dulberger. 1978. Floral enantiomorphy and the reproductive system of Wachendorfia paniculata (Haemodoraceae). New Phytologist 80:427-434.
37. Simpson, M. 1990. Phylogeny and classification of the Haemodoraceae. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 77:722-784.
38. Todd, J. E. 1882. On the flowers of Solanum rostratum and Cassia chamaecrista. American Naturalist 16:281-287.
39. Wang, G., R. Muira, and T. Kusangai. 1995. The enantiostyly and pollination biology of Monochoria korsakowii (Pontederiaceae). Acta Phytotaxonomica et Geobotanica 46:55-65.
40. Webb, C. J., and D. G. Lloyd. 1986. The avoidance of interference between the presentation of pollen and stigmas in angiosperms. II. Herkogamy. New Zealand Journal of Botany 34:164-178.
41. Whalen, M. D. 1984. Conspectus of species groups in Solanum subgenus Leptostemonum. Gentes Herbarum 12:179-282.