Quantum Monte Carlo study of the three-dimensional attractive Hubbard model

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 66, Issue 14, 2002, Pages 1405041-1405044

  Sewer, Alain ^a,b   Zotos, Xenophon ^a   Beck, Hans ^b  

^a INSTITUT ROMAND DE RECHERCHE NUMÉRIQUE EN PHYSIQUE DES MATÉRIAUX IRRMA   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEUCHÂTEL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONDUCTANCE; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MONTE CARLO METHOD; POLYMERIZATION; QUANTUM THEORY; TEMPERATURE DEPENDENCE;

EID: 20744455686     PISSN: 01631829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.66.140504     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. A. J. Legett, in Modern Trends in the Theory of Condensed Matter, edited by A. Pekalski and R. Przystawa (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1985).
2. P. Nozières and S. Schmitt-Rink, J. Low Temp. Phys. 59, 195 (1985).
3. M. Randeria, in Bose-Einstein Condensation, edited by A. Griffin, D. Snoke, and S. Stringari (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994).
4. R. Micnas, J. Ranninger, and S. Robaszkiewicz, Rev. Mod. Phys. 62, 113 (1990).
5. J.E. Hirsch, Phys. Rev. B 28, 4059 (1983).
6. E. Y. Loh and J. E. Gubernatis, in Electronic Phase Transitions, edited by W. Hanke and Y. V. Kopaev (Elsevier Science Publishers, New York, 1992).
7. M. Keller, W. Metzner, and U. Schollwock, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 4612 (2001).
8. M. Capone, C. Castellani, and M. Grilli, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 126403 (2002).
9. R. Staudt, M. Dzierzawa, and A. Muramatsu, Eur. Phys. J. B 17, 411 (2000).
10. F.F. Assaad, W. Hanke, and D.J. Scalapino, Phys. Rev. B 50, 12 835 (1994).
11. A. Sewer, Ph.D. thesis, Université de Neuchâtel, 2002.
12. J.R. Engelbrecht and H. Zhao, cond-mat/0110356 (unpublished).
13. T. Schneider and J. M. Singer, Phase Transtion Approach to High Temperature Superconductivity (Imperial College Press, London, 2000).
14. It would be interesting to compare the DQMC data with DMFT results obtained using a more realistic density of states, e.g., corresponding to a 3D tight-binding system, rather than the elliptic one used in Ref. 7.
15. R. dos Santos, Phys. Rev. B 50, 635 (1994).
16. S. Allen, H. Touchette, S. Moukouri, Y.M. Vilk, and A.M.S. Tremblay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4128 (1999).
17. E. Babaev, Phys. Rev. B 63, 184514 (2001).
18. G. Preosti, Y.M. Vilk, and M.R. Norman, Phys. Rev. B 59, 1474 (1999).
19. J.M. Singer, T. Schneider, and M.H. Pedersen, Eur. Phys. J. B 2, 17 (1998).
20. S. Moukouri, S. Allen, F. Lemay, B. Kyung, D. Poulin, Y.M. Vilk, and A.M.S. Tremblay, Phys. Rev. B 61, 7887 (2000).
21. J.L. Tallon and J.W. Loram, Physica C 318, 194 (2001).