Dynamical mean-field theory for pairing and spin gap in the attractive Hubbard model

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 86, Issue 20, 2001, Pages 4612-4615

  Keller, M ^a   Metzner, W ^a   Schollwock U ^b  

^a RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; CRYSTAL LATTICES; FERMI LEVEL; MONTE CARLO METHODS; PHASE TRANSITIONS; SUPERCONDUCTING TRANSITION TEMPERATURE; SUPERCONDUCTIVITY;

MEAN-FIELD THEORY;

QUANTUM THEORY;

EID: 0035858494     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.4612     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. J. Bardeen, L. N. Cooper, and J. R. Schrieffer, Phys. Rev. 108, 1175 (1957).
2. A. J. Leggett, in Modern Trends in the Theory of Condensed Matter, edited by A. Pekalski and J. Przystawa (Springer, Berlin, 1980).
3. P. Nozières and S. Schmitt-Rink, J. Low Temp. Phys. 59, 195 (1985).
4. Physical Properties of High Temperature Superconductors, edited by D. M. Ginsberg (World Scientific, Singapore, 1996).
5. For a review, see M. Randeria, in Boxe-Einstein Condensation, edited by A. Griffin, D. Snoke, and S. Stringari (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1995).
6. For a review, see M. Randeria, in Proceedings of the International School of Physics "Enrico Fermi," edited by G. Iadonisi, J. Schrieffer, and M. Chiofalo (IOS Press, Amsterdam, 1998); for a very recent complementary discussion, see also B. Kyung, S. Allen, and A.-M. S. Tremblay, cond-mat/0010001.
7. For a review, see M. Randeria, in Proceedings of the International School of Physics "Enrico Fermi," edited by G. Iadonisi, J. Schrieffer, and M. Chiofalo (IOS Press, Amsterdam, 1998); for a very recent complementary discussion, see also B. Kyung, S. Allen, and A.-M. S. Tremblay, cond-mat/0010001.
8. For a review, see A. Georges, G. Kotliar, W. Krauth, and M. Rozenberg, Rev. Mod. Phys. 68, 13 (1996).
9. M. Randeria, N. Trivedi, A. Moreo, and R. T. Scalettar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2001 (1992); N. Trivedi and M. Randeria, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 312 (1995).
10. M. Randeria, N. Trivedi, A. Moreo, and R. T. Scalettar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2001 (1992); N. Trivedi and M. Randeria, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 312 (1995).
11. J. M. Singer, M. H. Pedersen, T. Schneider, H. Beck, and H.-G. Matuttis, Phys. Rev. B 54, 1286 (1996).
12. R. R. dos Santos, Phys. Rev. B 50, 635 (1994).
13. For a review, see R. Micnas, J. Ranninger, and S. Robaszkiewicz, Rev. Mod. Phys. 62, 113 (1990).
14. W. Metzner and D. Vollhardt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 324 (1989).
15. The hard-core Bose gas can be mapped to an antiferromagnetic Heisenberg model in an external magnetic field, and its mean-field theory maps to the standard mean-field theory of the Heisenberg model; see, for example Ref. [11], Sec. IIB.
16. J. E. Hirsch and R. M. Fye, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 2521 (1986).
17. J. K. Freericks, M. Jarrell, and D. J. Scalapino, Phys. Rev. B 48, 6302 (1993).
18. c with respect to the standard mean-field result by a finite factor even in the weak coupling limit; see, for example, P. G. J. van Dongen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 757 (1991); A. Georges and J. S. Yedidia, Phys. Rev. B 43, 3475 (1991).
19. c with respect to the standard mean-field result by a finite factor even in the weak coupling limit; see, for example, P. G. J. van Dongen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 757 (1991); A. Georges and J. S. Yedidia, Phys. Rev. B 43, 3475 (1991).
20. M. Keller, W. Metzner, and U. Schollwöck, Phys. Rev. B 60, 3499 (1999).
21. See the analogous argument for the half-filled repulsive Hubbard model in Ref. [7], Sec. VII.C.
22. R. Micnas et al., Phys. Rev. B 52, 16 223 (1995).
23. L. Laloux, A. Georges, and W. Krauth, Phys. Rev. B 50, 3092 (1994).