Poultry nutrition: A comparative approach

Journal of Applied Poultry Research

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 426-436

  Klasing, K C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Galliformes; Nutritional strategy; Omnivore

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA; AVES; GALLIFORMES; GALLUS GALLUS; HEXAPODA; INSECTA; ISOPTERA; MELEAGRIS GALLOPAVO;

EID: 20444415343     PISSN: 10566171     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/japr/14.2.426     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (64)

1. Klasing, K. C. 1998. Comparative Avian Nutrition. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.
2. King, A. S., and J. McLelland. 1984. Birds: Their Structure and Function. 2nd ed. Bailliere Tindall, London.
3. Fumihito, A., T. Miyake, M. Takada, R. Shingu, T. Endo, T. Gojobori, N. Kondo, and S. Ohno. 1996. Monophyletic origin and unique dispersal patterns of domestic fowls. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 93:6792-6795.
4. Moiseyeva, I. G., M. N. Romanov, A. A. Nikiforov, A. A. Sevastyanova, and S. K. Semyenova. 2003. Evolutionary relationships of Red Jungle Fowl and chicken breeds. Genet. Sel. Evol. 35:403-423.
5. Ohta, N., M. Kajita, S. Kusuhara, and R. Kakizawa. 2000. Genetic differentiation and phylogenetic relationships among species of Gallus (Jungle Fowl) and the chicken. Jpn. Poult. Sci. 37:33-39.
6. Hillel, J., M. A. M. Groenen, M. Tixier-Boichard, A. B. Korol, L. David, V. M. Kirzhner, T. Burke, A. Barre-Dirie, R. P. M. A. Crooijmans, K. Elo, M. W. Feldman, P. J. Freidlin, A. Maki-Tanila, M. Oortwijn, P. Thomson, A. Vignal, K. Wimmers, and S. Weigend. 2003. Biodiversity of 52 chicken populations assessed by microsatellite typing of DNA pools. Genet. Sel. Evol. 35:533-557.
7. Bush, K. L., and C. Strobeck. 2003. Phylogenetic relationships of the Phasianidae reveals possible non-pheasant taxa. J. Hered. 94:472-489.
8. Mock, K. E., T. C. Theimer, O. E. Rhodes, Jr., D. L. Greenberg, and P. Keim. 2002. Genetic variation across the historical range of the wild turkey (Meleagris gallopavo). Mol. Ecol. 11:643-657.
9. Schorger, A. W. 1966. The Wild Turkey: Its History and Domestication. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman, OK.
10. Dimcheff, D. E., S. V. Drovetski, and D. P. Mindell. 2002. Phylogeny of Tetraoninae and other galliform birds using mitochondrial 12S and ND2 genes. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 24:203-215.
11. Dudley, R., and G. J. Vermeij. 1991. Do the power requirements of flapping flight constrain folivory in flying animals? Funct. Ecol. 6:101-104.
12. Cork, S. J. 1994. Digestive constraints on dietary scope in small and moderately-small mammals: How much do we really understand? Pages 324-336 in The Digestive System in Mammals: Food, Form and Function. D. J. Chivers and P. Langer, ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
13. Gasaway, W. C. 1976. Seasonal variation in diet, volatile fatty acid production and size of the cecum of rock ptarmigan. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 53A:109-114.
14. Levey, D. J., and W. H. Karasov. 1989. Digestive responses of temperate birds switched to fruit or insect diets. Auk. 106:675-686.
15. Karasov, W. H. 1990. Digestion in birds: Chemical and physiological determinants and ecological implications. Stud. Avian Biol. 13:391-415.
16. Afik, D., and W. H. Karasov. 1995. The trade-offs between digestion rate and efficiency in warblers and their ecological implications. Ecology 76:2247-2257.
17. Beebe, W. 1990. A Monograph of the Pheasants. Dover Publications, New York.
18. Wells, D. R. 1999. The Birds of the Thai-Malay Peninsula. Vol. 1. Non-Passerines. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
19. Collias, N. E., and E. C. Collias. 1967. A field study of the red jungle fowl in north-central India. Condor 69:360-386.
20. Collias, N. E., and P. Saichuae. 1967. Ecology of the Red Jungle Fowl in Thailand and Malaya with reference to the origin of domestication. Nat. Hist. Bull. Siam 22:189-209.
21. Bump, G., and W. H. Bohl. 1961. Red Junglefowl and Kaliji Pheasants. US Fish and Wildlife Service Fish and Wildlife Research Service, Washington, DC.
22. Holdsworth, R. L. 1958. Note on junglefowl shooting. Wild Life Preservation Society of India, Dehradun, UP, India.
23. Johnson, R. A. 1963. Habitat preference and behavior of breeding jungle fowl in central western Thailand. Wilson Bull. 75:270-272.
24. Schutz, K., S. Kerje, O. Carlborg, L. Jacobsson, L. Andersson, and P. Jensen. 2002. QTL analysis of a Red Jungle Fowl x White Leghorn intercross reveals trade-off in resource allocation between behavior and production traits. Behav. Genet. 32:423-433.
25. Andersson, M., E. Nordin, and P. Jensen. 2001. Domestication effects on foraging strategies in fowl. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 72:51-62.
26. Dawkins, M. S. 1989. Time budgets in red junglefowl as a baseline for the assessment of welfare in domestic fowl. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 24:77-80.
27. H. S. Iman Rahayu, A. R. Alimon, M. K. Vidyadaran, and S. A. Babjee. 2001. Responses of choice-fed red jungle fowl and commercial broiler chickens offered a complete diet, corn and soybean. Asian-australas. J. Anim. Sci. 14:1758-1762.
28. Savory, C. J., D. G. M. Wood-Gush, and I. J. H. Duncan. 1978. Feeding behaviour in a population of domestic fowls in the wild. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 4:13-27.
29. Gamberale-Stille, G. and B. S. Tullberg. 2001. Fruit or aposematic insect? Context-dependent colour preferences in domestic chicks. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 268:2525-2529.
30. Darwin, C. 1859. On the Origin of Species. J. Murray, London.
31. West, B. and B.-X. Zhou. 1989. Did chickens go north? New evidence for domestication. Worlds Poul. Sci. J. 45:205-208.
32. Wood-Gush, D. G. 1959. A history of the domestic chicken from antiquity to the 19th century. Poult. Sci. 38:321-326.
33. Armsby, H. P. 1908. The Principles of Animal Nutrition. J. Wiley and Sons, New York.
34. Jackson, S., and J. Diamond. 1996. Metabolic and digestive responses to artificial selection in chickens. Evolution 50:1638-1650.
35. Jackson, S., and J. Diamond. 1995. Ontogenetic development of gut function, growth, and metabolism in a wild bird, the Red Jungle Fowl. Am. J. Physiol. 269:R1163-R1173.
36. Leopold, A. 1959. Wildlife of Mexico, The Game Birds and Mammals. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
37. Leopold, A. 1948. The wild turkeys of Mexico. N. Am. Wildl. Conf. 13:393-400.
38. Korschgen, L. J. 1967. Feeding habits and foods. Pages 123-179 in The Wild Turkey. O. H. Hewitt, ed. The Wildlife Society, Washington DC.
39. Mosby, H. S., and C. O. Handly. 1943. The wild turkey in Virginia: Its status, life history and management. VA Comm. Game and Inland Fisheries, Richmond, VA.
40. Leopold, A. 1933. Game Management. Scribner, New York.
41. Rumble, M. A., and S. H. Anderson. 1996. Feeding ecology of Merriam's turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo merriami) in the Black Hills, South Dakota. Am. Midl. Nat. 136:157-171.
42. York, D. L., and S. D. Schemnitz. 2003. Home range, habitat use, and diet of Gould's Turkeys, Peloncillo Mountains, New Mexico. Southwest. Nat. 48:231-240.
43. Lindzey, J. S. 1967. Highlights of management. Pages 219-253 in The Wild Turkey. O. H. Hewitt, ed. The Wildlife Society, Washington DC.
44. Martinez del Rio, C. M., and W. H. Karasov. 1990. Digestion strategies in nectar-eating and fruit-eating birds and the sugar composition of plant rewards. Am. Nat. 136:618-637.
45. Levey, D. J., and W. H. Karasov. 1992. Digestive modulation in a seasonal frugivore, the American Robin (Turdus-Migratorius). Am. J. Physiol. 262:G711-G718.
46. Clench, M. H., and J. R. Mathias. 1995. The avian cecum - a review. Wilson Bull. 107:93-121.
47. Duke, G. E. 1982. Gastrointestinal motility and its regulation. Poult. Sci. 61:1245-1256.
48. Bjornhag, G. 1989. Transport of water and food particles through the avian ceca and colon. J. Exp. Zool. 3:32-37.
49. Mahdi, A. H., and J. McLelland. 1988. The arrangement of the muscle at the ileo-caeco-rectal junction of the domestic duck (Anas platyrhynchos) and the presence of anatomical sphincters. J. Anat. 161:133-142.
50. Zubair, A. K., C. W. Forsberg, and S. Leeson. 1996. Effect of dietary fat, fiber, and monensin on cecal activity in turkeys. Poult. Sci. 75:891-899.
51. Terada, A., H. Hara, J. Sakamoto, N. Sato, S. Takagi, T. Mitsuoka, R. Mino, K. Hara, I. Fujimori, and T. Yamada. 1994. Effects of dietary supplementation with lactosucrose (4G-beta-D-galactosylsucrose) on cecal flora, cecal metabolites, and performance in broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 73:1663-1672.
52. Swart, D., F. K. Siebrits, and J. P. Hayes. 1993. Utilization of metabolizable energy by ostrich (Struthio-Camelus) chicks at 2 different concentrations of dietary energy and crude fibre originating from lucerne. S-Afr. Tydskr Veekd. 23:136-141.
53. Swart, D., R. I. Mackie, and J. P. Hayes. 1993. Fermentative digestion in the ostrich (Struthio-Camelus Var Domesticus), a large avian species that utilizes cellulose. SS-Afir. Tydskr Veekd. 23:127-135.
54. Remmington, T. E. 1989. Why do grouse have ceca? A test of the fiber digestion theory. J. Exp. Zool. 3:87-94.
55. Moss, R. 1989. Gut size and the digestion of fibrous diets by Tetraonid birds. J. Exp. Zool. 3:61-65.
56. Prop, J., and T. Vulink. 1992. Digestion by barnacle geese in the annual cycle - the interplay between retention time and food quality. Funct. Ecol. 6:180-189.
57. Grajal, A., S. D. Strahl, R. Parra, M. G. Dominguez, and A. Neher. 1989. Foregut fermentation in the hoatzin, a neotropical leaf-eating bird. Science 245:1236-1238.
58. Dominguez-Bello, M. G., M. Lovera, P. Suarez, and F. Michelangeli. 1993. Microbial digestive symbionts of the crop of the Hoatzin: An avian foregut fermenter. Physiol. Zool. 66:374-383.
59. Koutsos, E. A., L. A. Tell, L. W. Woods, and K. C. Klasing. 2003. Adult cockatiels (Nymphicus hollandicus) at maintenance are more sensitive to diets containing excess vitamin A than to vitamin A-deficient diets. J. Nutr. 133:1898-1902.
60. Koutsos, E. A., J. Smith, L. W. Woods, and K. C. Klasing. 2001. Adult cockatiels (Nymphicus hollandicus) metabolically adapt to high protein diets. J. Nutr. 131:2014-2020.
61. Myers, M. R., and K. C. Klasing. 1999. Low glucokinase activity and high rates of gluconeogenesis contribute to hyperglycemia in barn owls (Tyto alba) after a glucose challenge. J. Nutr. 129:1896-1904.
62. Redig, P. T. 1989. The avian ceca - obligate combustion chambers or facultative afterburners - the conditioning influence of diet. J. Exp. Zool. 3:66-69.
63. Starck, J. M., and G. H. Rahmaan. 2003. Phenotypic flexibility of structure and function of the digestive system of Japanese quail. J. Exp. Biol. 206:1887-1897.
64. Starck, J. M. 1999. Phenotypic flexibility of the avian gizzard: Rapid, reversible and repeated changes of organ size in response to changes in dietary fibre content. J. Exp. Biol. 202:3171-3179.