Predicting the grade of disability 1 year after stroke following rehabilitation

Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences

Volumn 21, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 212-219

  Lin, Jau Hong ^a   Tsai, Athena Yi Jung ^a   Lo, Sing Kai ^c   Chang, Jyh Jong ^a   Huang, Mao Hsiung ^b  

^a KAOHSIUNG MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b KAOHSIUNG MEDICAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Disability; Rehabilitation; Stroke

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CAREGIVER; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DEMOGRAPHY; DIABETES MELLITUS; DISABILITY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HEART DISEASE; HEMIPLEGIA; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MARRIAGE; OCCUPATION; ORIENTATION; OUTPATIENT CARE; REHABILITATION CENTER; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STROKE; TAIWAN; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CLASSIFICATION; CONVALESCENCE; DISABLED PERSON; MIDDLE AGED; PROGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS; TIME;

AGED; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; DISABLED PERSONS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HOSPITALS, UNIVERSITY; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; TAIWAN; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 20444404613     PISSN: 02575655     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s1607-551x(09)70190-1     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Iwanenko W, Fiedler RC, Granger CV. Uniform data system for medical rehabilitation: report of first admissions to subacute rehabilitation for 1995, 1996 and 1997. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1999;78:384-8.
2. Jorgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, et al. Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. Part 1: outcome. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995;76: 399-405.
3. Lin SH. Home health care and social supports for community-dwelling stroke patients. J Formas Med Assoc 1993;92(Suppl 4): 177-83. [In Chinese]
4. Clarke PJ, Black SE, Badley EM, et al. Handicap in stroke survivors. Disabil Rehabil 1999;21:116-23.
5. Patrick DL. A socio-medical approach to disablement. In: Patrick DL, Peach H, eds. Disablement in the Community. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989:1-18.
6. Nagi SZ. Disability and Rehabilitation: Legal, Clinical, and Self-concepts, and Measurement, Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1969.
7. Charlton JH. Approaches to assessing disability. In: Patrick DL, Peach H, eds. Disablement in the Community. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989:39-61.
8. The Regulations of the Physically and Mentally Disabled Evaluation. Taipei: Department of Health, 1999.
9. Stroke-1989. Recommendations on stroke prevention, diagnosis and therapy. Report of the WHO Task Force on Stroke and Other Cerebrovascular Disorders. Stroke 1989;20: 1407-31.
10. th revision. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1977.
11. Guide for the Uniform Data Set for Medical Rehabilitation (including the FIM™ instrument), Version 5.1. Buffalo: State University of New York at Buffalo, 1997.
12. Pedersen PM, Jorgensen HS, Nakayama H, et al. Orientation in the acute and chronic stroke patient: impact on ADL and social activities. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996;77:336-9.
13. Brosseau L, Potvin L, Philippe P, et al. Post-stroke inpatient rehabilitation: predicting discharge disposition. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1996;75:431-6.
14. Wade DT, Hewer RL. Functional abilities after stroke: measurement, natural history and prognosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1987;50:177-82.
15. Sze K-H, Wong E, Or KH, et al. Factors predicting stroke disability at discharge: a study of 793 Chinese. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000;81:876-80.
16. Social Security Administration. Disability Evaluation Under Social Security. Department of Health and Human Services, Blue Book, 2003.
17. Hsueh IP, Wang WC, Sheu CF, et al. Rasch analysis on combining two indices for assessing comprehensive ADL function in stroke patients. Stroke 2004;35:721-6.
18. Patel AT. Disability evaluation following stroke. Phys Med Rehabil Clin North Am 2001;12:613-9.
19. Ween JE, Alexander MP, D'Esposito M, et al. Factors predictive of stroke outcome in a rehabilitation setting. Neurology 1996; 47:388-92.
20. Inouye M, Hashimoto H, Mio T, et al. Influence of admission functional status on functional change after stroke rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2001;80:121-5.
21. Glass TA, Matchar DB, Belyea M, et al. Impact of social support on outcome in first stroke. Stroke 1993;24:64-70.
22. Tatemichi TK, Desmond DW, Stern Y, et al. Cognitive impairment after stroke: frequency, patterns, and relationship to functional abilities. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1994;57:202-7.
23. Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Kollen BJ, et al. Predicting disability in stroke - a critical review of the literature. Age Ageing 1996; 25:479-89.