Can US-guided vacuum-assisted biopsies be an alternative to diagnostic surgery in cases of non-diagnostic core needle biopsy?;Les macrobiopsies échoguidées assistées par le vide peuvent-elles constituer une alternative à la chirurgie diagnostique en cas de microbiopsies non contributives?

Journal de Radiologie

Volumn 86, Issue 5 I, 2005, Pages 475-480

  Carpentier, E ^a   Maruani, A ^a   Michenet, P ^a   Bonneau, C ^a   Degand, P ^a   Lebas, P ^a  

^a CENTRE HOSPITALIER RÉGIONAL D ORLÉANS   (France)

Author keywords

Breast pathology; Mammotome ; Ultrasonography; Vacuum assisted biopsy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CARCINOMA; BREAST DUCT ECTASIA; BREAST FIBROADENOMA; BREAST HYPERPLASIA; BREAST LESION; CANCER SURGERY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FIBROCYSTIC BREAST DISEASE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASTECTOMY; MASTITIS; NEEDLE BIOPSY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; VACUUM; VACUUM ASSISTED BIOPSY; BIOPSY; BREAST; BREAST TUMOR; CARCINOMA IN SITU; ENDOSCOPIC ECHOGRAPHY; HYPERPLASIA; LUNG CARCINOMA; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PAGET NIPPLE DISEASE; PATHOLOGY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOPSY; BIOPSY, FINE-NEEDLE; BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA IN SITU; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL, BREAST; CARCINOMA, LOBULAR; FEMALE; FIBROCYSTIC BREAST DISEASE; HUMANS; HYPERPLASIA; MASTITIS; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL; VACUUM;

EID: 20444383479     PISSN: 02210363     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0221-0363(05)81392-7     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Parker SH, Jobe WE, Dennis MA, et al. US-guided automated large-core breast biopsy. Radiology 1993;187:507-11.
2. Liberman L, Feng TL, Dershaw DD, et al. Ultrasound-guided core breast biopsy: utility and cost-effectiveness. Radiology 1998;208:717-23.
3. Parker SH. Percutaneous large core breast biopsy: A multi-institutional study. Radiology 1994;193:359-64.
4. Collins LC, Connolly JL, Page DL, et al. Diagnostic agreement in the evaluation of image-guided breast core needle biopsies. Am J Surg Pathol 2004;28:126-31.
5. Philpotts LE, Hooley RJ, Lee CH. Comparison of automated versus vacuum-assisted biopsy methods for sonographically guided core biopsy of the breast. AJR 2003;180:347-91.
6. Parker SH, Klaus A, Mc Wey PJ, et al. Sonographically guided directinal vacuum-assisted breast biopsy using a handheld device. AJR 2001;177:405-8.
7. Travade A, Isnard A, Bagard C et al. Macrobiopsies stéré otaxiques par système à aspiration 11-g: A propos de 249 patientes. J Radiol 2002;83:1063-71.
8. Burbank F. Stereotactic breast biopsy of atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ lesions: improved accuracy with directional, vacuum assisted biopsy. Radiology 1997;202:843-7.
9. Steyaert L, Rigauts H. Prélèvements assistés par aspiration, sous guidage échographique. Le Sein 2003;2:201-4.
10. Sebag P, Rouyer N. Macrobiopsie par aspiration sous échographie: application avec le Mammotome HH. Le Sein 2000;10:221-9.
11. Dennis MA, Parker SH, Kaske TI, et al. Incidental treatment of nipple discharge caused by benign intraductal papilloma though diagnostic Mammotome biopsy. AJR 2000;174:1263-8.
12. Soo MS, Baker JA, Rosen EL. Sonographic detection and sonographically guided biopsy of breast microcalcifications. AJR 2003;180:941-8.
13. Perez-Fuentes JA, Longobardi IR, Acosta VF, Marin CR, Liberman L. Sonographically guided directional vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: preliminary experience in Venezuela. AJR 2001;177:1459-63.
14. rd ed. Reston VA 1998.
15. Stavros AT, Thickman DT, Rapp CL et al. Solid breast nodules: use of sonograhy to distinguish between benign ant malignant lesions. Radiology 1995;196:123-34.
16. World Health Organization Classification of Tumours. Pathology and genetics of tumours of the breast and female genital organs. Tavassoli FA, Devilee P, édit., Lyon 2003.
17. Zafrani B, Vincent-Salomon A. Lésions et tumeurs bénignes du sein. Ann Pathol 2000;20:570-87.
18. Liberman L. Clinical management issues in percutaneous core breast biopsy. Radiol Clin North Am 2000;38:791-807.
19. Kettritz U, Rotter K, Schreer I et al. Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in 2 874 patients. A multicenter study. Cancer 2004;100:245-51.
20. Plantade R, Hammou JC, Sighiera M et al. Sous-estimation du cancer du sein par les macrobiopsies stéréostaxiques 11-gauge assistées par le vide. J. Radiol 2004;85:391-401.
21. Jacobs TW, Connolly JL, Schnitt SJ. Nonmalignant lesions in breast core needle biopsies. To excise or not to excise? Am J Surg Pathol 2002;26:1095-110.
22. Liberman L, Kaplan JB, Morris AE, et al. To excise or to sample the mammographic target: what is the goal of the stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum assisted breast biopsy. AJR 2002;179:679-83.
23. Liberman L, Drotman M, Morris E, et al. Imaging-histologic discordance at percutaneous breast biopsy. An indicator of missed cancer. Cancer 2000;89:2538-45.
24. Bonneau C, Lebas P, Michenet P. Cicatrice et lésions de déplacement. Etude anatomo-pathologique de 31 pièces opératoires après macrobiopsies à l'aiguille de 11 Gauge pour des foyers de microcalcifications du sein. Ann Pathol 2002;22:441-7.