An international study to investigate prospective teachers’ content knowledge of the area concept

European Journal of Teacher Education

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 137-150

  Berenson, Sarah ^a   Van Der Valk, Ton ^b   Oldham, Elizabeth ^b   Runesson, Ulla ^b   Moreira, Candida Queiroz ^b   Broekman, Harrie ^b  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 20444382869     PISSN: 02619768     EISSN: 14695928     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0261976970200203     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Ball, D., 1993. “ Halves, pieces, and twoths: constructing and using representational contexts in teaching fractions ”. In Rational Numbers: an integration of research, Edited by: Carpenter, T., Fennema, E., and Romberg, T., 157–194. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2. Baturo, A., and NaSON, R., 1996. Student teachers’ subject matter knowledge within the domain of area measurement. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 31 (3): 235–268.
3. Blanton, M., Runesson, U., and Berenson, S., Using pre-service teachers’ lesson plans to understand their ideas of teaching. Paper presented at the ATEE Annual Meeting. Glasgow, Scotland.
4. Borko, H., Eisenhart, M., Brown, C, Underhill, R., Jones, D., and Agard, P., 1992. Learning to teach hard mathematics: do novice teachers and their instructors give up too easily?. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23(3): 194–222.
5. Broekman, H.G.B., and Weterings, J.M.J., 1987. The prehistory of teacher-trainees and the consequences for teacher education. Journal for Mathematical Behavior, 6: 201–216.
6. Brown, C., and Borko, H., 1992. “ Becoming a mathematics teacher ”. In Handbook on Research on Mathematics Teaching, Edited by: Grouws, D., 209–239. New York: MacMillan.
7. Calderhead, J., 1988. Teachers’ Professional Learning, London: Falmer.
8. Cooney, T., and Wilson, P., 1995. “ On the notion of secondary pre-service teachers’ ways of knowing mathematics ”. In Proceedings of the North American Chapter of Psychology of Mathematics Education, Edited by: Owens, D., Reed, M., and Millsaps, G., 91–96. Columbus: ERIC Clearinghouse.
9. Ernest, P., 1994. “ Social constructivism and the psychology of mathematics education ”. In Constructing Mathematical Knowledge: epistemology and mathematics education, Edited by: Ernest, P., 62–72. London: Falmer.
10. Even, R., 1993. Subject-matter knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge: prospective secondary teachers and the function concept. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 24(2): 94–116.
11. Even, R., and Tirosh, D., 1995. Subject-matter knowledge and knowledge about students as sources of teacher presentations of the subject matter. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 29: 21–27.
12. Fischbein, E., 1994. “ The interaction between the formal, the algorithmic and the intuitive components in a mathematical activity ”. In Sarah Berenson Edited by: BICHLER, B., and Scholz, R.W., Vol. 150, et al
13. STRISSER, B., and Winkelmann, B., eds. Didactics of Mathematics as a Scientific Discipline, 231–245. Dordrecht: Kluwer-Academic.
14. Gelman, R., and Meck, E., 1986. “ The notion of principle: the case of counting ”. In Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge. The case of mathematics, Edited by: HIEBERT, J., 29–57. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15. Greiner-Makin, S., 1996. Why is the “duckling” preferable to the “parrot” as a teacher?. European Journal of Teacher Education, 19 (1): 13–18.
16. Haggarty, L., 1995. New Ideas for Teacher Education, London: Cassell.
17. Hiebert, J., ed. 1986. Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge: the case of mathematics, Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18. Hiebert, J., and Lefevre, P., 1986. “ Conceptual and procedural knowledge in mathematics: an introductory analysis ”. In Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge: the case of mathematics, Edited by: Hiebert, J., 1–27. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19. Jaworski, B., 1994. Investigating Mathematics Teaching, London: Falmer.
20. Mosenthal, J., and Ball, D., 1992. Constructing new forms of teaching: subject matter knowledge in inservice teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 43: 347–356.
21. Oldham, E., Evans, A., and Olaya, M.E., Pre-service teachers’ ideas about teaching mathematics: An Irish perspective. Paper presented at the ATEE Annual Meeting. Glasgow, Scotland.
22. Simon, M., 1993. Prospective elementary teachers’ knowledge of division. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 24(3): 233–254.
23. Shulman, L., 1986. Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2): 4–14.
24. Shulman, L., 1987. Knowledge and teaching: foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1): 1–22.
25. Skemp, R., 1976. Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Mathematics Teaching, 77: 1–7.
26. Van Der Valk, T., and Broekman, H., Dutch pre-service teachers’ ideas on teaching mathematics. Paper presented at the ATEE Annual Meeting. Glasgow, Scotland.
27. Van Der Valk, T., Somers, T., Wubbels, T., and Korthagen, F., Commuting between practice and theory in an immersion teacher education program. Paper presented at the AERA Annual Meeting. New York.
28. Whitney, H., 1986. Coming alive in school math and beyond. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 5: 129–140.