Modern imaging using computer tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) AU1

Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 45-54

  Schreyer, Andreas G ^a   Seitz, Johannes ^a   Feuerbach, Stefan ^a   Rogler, Gerhard ^a   Herfarth, Hans ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF REGENSBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Abdominal CT; Endoscopy; Enteroclysis; MRI; Virtual colonography

Indexed keywords

BARIUM ENEMA; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ENTERITIS; HUMAN; IONIZING RADIATION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SMALL INTESTINE;

COLONOSCOPY; HUMANS; INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASES; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 0347286900     PISSN: 10780998     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00054725-200401000-00008     Document Type: Review

References (94)

1. Carucci LR, Levine MS. Radiographic imaging of inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2002;31:93-117.
2. Rubesin SE, Maglinte DD. Double-contrast barium enema technique. Radiol Clin North Am. 2003;41:365-376.
3. Herlinger H. Guide to imaging of the small bowel. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 1995;24:309-329.
4. Sellink JL. Radiologic examination of the small intestine by duodenal intubation. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh). 1974;15:318-332.
5. Ott DJ, Chen YM, Gelfand DW, et al. Detailed per-oral small bowel examination vs. enteroclysis. Part II: Radiographic accuracy. Radiology. 1985;155:31-34.
6. Toms AP, Barltrop A, Freeman AH. A prospective randomised study comparing enteroclysis with small bowel follow-through examinations in 244 patients. Eur Radiol. 2001;11:1155-1160.
7. Kelvin FM, Maglinte DD. Enteroclysis or small bowel follow-through in Crohn' s diseases? Gastroenterology. 1998;114:1349-1351.
8. Ruiz-Cruces R, Ruiz F, Perez-Martinez M, et al. de los Rios AD. Patient dose from barium procedures. Br J Radiol. 2000;73:752-761.
9. Hart D, Haggett PJ, Boardman P, et al. Patient radiation doses from enteroclysis examinations. Br J Radiol. 1994;67:997-1000.
10. Antes G. Barium examinations of the small intestine and the colon in inflammatory bowel disease. Radiologe. 2003;43:9-16.
11. Antes G. Inflammatory bowel diseases. Colon contrast enema and CT. Radiologe. 1998;38:41-49.
12. Rieber A, Wruk D, Potthast S, et al. Diagnostic imaging in Crohn's disease: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and conventional imaging methods. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2000;15:176-181.
13. Mako EK, Mester AR, Tarjan Z, et al. Enteroclysis and spiral CT examination in diagnosis and evaluation of small bowel Crohn's disease. Eur J Radiol. 2000;35:168-175.
14. Turetschek K, Schober E, Wunderbaldinger P, et al. Findings at helical CT-enteroclysis in symptomatic patients with Crohn disease: correlation with endoscopic and surgical findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2002;26: 488-492.
15. Bender GN, Maglinte DD, Kloppel VR, et al. CT enteroclysis: a superfluous diagnostic procedure or valuable when investigating small-bowel disease? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999;172:373-378.
16. Klöppel R, Thiele J, Bosse J. The Sellink CT method. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr. 1992;156:291-292.
17. Thiele J, Kloppel R, Schulz HG. CT-Sellink-a new method of evaluating the intestinal wall. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr. 1993;159:213-217.
18. Maglinte DD, Gage SN, Hannon BH, et al. Obstruction of the small intestine: accuracy and role of CT in diagnosis. Radiology. 1993;188: 61-64.
19. Burkill GJ, Bell JR, Healy JC. The utility of computed tomography in acute small bowel obstruction. Clin Radiol. 2001;56:350-359.
20. Bender GN, Timmons JH, Williard WC, et al. Computed tomographic enteroclysis: one methodology. Invest Radiol. 1996;31:43-49.
21. Reittner P, Goritschnig T, Petritsch W, et al. Multiplanar spiral CT enterography in patients with Crohn's disease using a negative oral contrast material: initial results of a noninvasive imaging approach. Eur Radiol. 2002;12:2253-2257.
22. Albrich H, Herfarth HH, Schreyer AG, et al. Tasty, cost-effective and healthy: Abdominal MRI in patients with IBD with a new oral contrast agent. Gastroenterology. 2000;118:A1077. [abstract]
23. Albrich H, Geissler A, Andus T, et al. Abdominal MRI imaging in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: MR imaging after enteroclysis compared to oral contrast only. Radiology. 1999;213:120. [abstract]
24. Lauenstein TC, Schneemann H, Vogt FM, et al. Optimization of oral contrast agents for MR imaging of the small bowel. Radiology. 2003;228: 279-283.
25. Bitterling H, Rock C, Reiser M. Computed tomography in the diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease-methodology of MSCT and clinical results. Radiologe. 2003;43:17-25.
26. Schunk K, Kern A, Oberholzer K, et al. Hydro-MRI in Crohn's disease: appraisal of disease activity. Invest Radiol. 2000;35:431-437.
27. Madsen SM, Thomsen HS, Munkholm P, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of Crohn disease: early recognition of treatment response and relapse. Abdom Imaging. 1997;22:164-166.
28. Madsen SM, Thomsen HS, Schlichting P, et al. Evaluation of treatment response in active Crohn's disease by low-field magnetic resonance imaging. Abdom Imaging. 1999;24:232-239.
29. Umschaden HW, Szolar D, Gasser J, et al. Small-bowel disease: comparison of MR enteroclysis images with conventional enteroclysis and surgical findings. Radiology. 2000;215:717-725.
30. Maccioni F, Viscido A, Marini M, et al. MRI evaluation of Crohn's disease of the small and large bowel with the use of negative superparamagnetic oral contrast agents. Abdom Imaging. 2002;27:384-393.
31. Maccioni F, Viscido A, Broglia L, et al. Evaluation of Crohn disease activity with magnetic resonance imaging. Abdom Imaging. 2000;25:219-228.
32. Shocnut JP, Semelka RC, Magro CM, et al. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and endoscopy in distinguishing the type and severity of inflammatory bowel disease. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1994;19:31-35.
33. Holzknecht N, Helmberger T, von Ritter C, et al. MRI of the small intestine with rapid MRI sequences in Crohn disease after enteroclysis with oral iron particles. Radiologe. 1998;38:29-36.
34. Koh DM, Miao Y, Chinn RJ, et al. MR imaging evaluation of the activity of Crohn's disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;177:1325-1332.
35. Small WC, DeSimone-Macchi D, Parker JR, et al. A multisite phase III study of the safety and efficacy of a new manganese chloride-based gastrointestinal contrast agent for MRI of the abdomen and pelvis. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1999;10:15-24.
36. Kettritz U, Isaacs K, Warshauer DM, et al. Crohn's disease. Pilot study comparing MRI of the abdomen with clinical evaluation. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1995;21:249-253.
37. Low RN, Sebrechts CP, Politoske DA, et al. Crohn disease with endoscopic correlation: single-shot fast spin-echo and gadolinium-enhanced fatsuppressed spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging. Radiology. 2002;222: 652-660.
38. Low RN, Francis IR, Politoske D, et al. Crohn's disease evaluation: comparison of contrast-enhanced MR imaging and single-phase helical CT scanning. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2000;11:127-135.
39. Marcos HB, Semelka RC. Evaluation of Crohn's disease using half-fourier RARE and gadolinium-enhanced SGE sequences: initial results. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2000;18:263-268.
40. Maglinte DD, Bender GN, Heitkamp DE, et al. Multidetector-row helical CT enteroclysis. Radiol Clin North Am. 2003;41:249-262.
41. Debatin JF, Lauenstein TC. Virtual magnetic resonance colonography. Gut. 2003;52(Suppl.):17-22.
42. Aschoff AJ, Zeitler H, Merkle EM, et al. MR enteroclysis for nuclear spin tomographic diagnosis of inflammatory bowel diseases with contrast enhancement. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr. 1997; 167:387-391.
43. Rieber A, Wruk D, Nussle K, et al. MRI of the abdomen combined with enteroclysis in Crohn disease using oral and intravenous Gd-DTPA. Radiologe. 1998;38:23-28.
44. Jamieson DH, Shipman PJ, Israel DM, et al. Comparison of multidetector CT and barium studies of the small bowel: inflammatory bowel disease in children. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;180:1211-1216.
45. Fishman EK, Wolf EJ, Jones B, et al. CT evaluation of Crohn's disease: effect on patient management. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1987;148:537-540.
46. Horton KM, Corl FM, Fishman EK. CT evaluation of the colon: inflammatory disease. Radiographics. 2000;20:399-418.
47. Strotzcr M, Manke C, Lock G, et al. Percutaneous abscess drainage in Crohn disease. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr. 1998;169:510-514.
48. Casola G, vanSonnenberg E, Neff CC, et al. Abscesses in Crohn disease: percutaneous drainage. Radiology. 1987;163:19-22.
49. Freeman AH, CT and bowel disease. Br J Radiol. 2001;74:4-14.
50. Gourtsoyiannis N, Papanikolaou N, Grammatikakis J, et al. MR enteroclysis: technical considerations and clinical applications. Eur Radiol. 2002;12:2651-2658.
51. Herlinger H, Furth EE, Rubesin SE. Fibrofatty proliferation of the mesentery in Crohn disease. Abdom Imaging. 1998;23:446-448.
52. Gore RM, Balthazar EJ, Ghahremani GG, et al. CT features of ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996;167:3-15.
53. Choi D, Jin Lee S, Ah Cho Y, et al. Bowel wall thickening in patients with Crohn's disease: CT patterns and correlation with inflammatory activity. Clin Radiol. 2003;58:68-74.
54. Del Campo L, Arribas I, Valbuena M, et al. Spiral CT findings in active and remission phases in patients with Crohn disease. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2001;25:792-797.
55. Costamagna G, Shah SK, Riccioni ME, et al. A prospective trial comparing small bowel radiographs and video capsule endoscopy for suspected small bowel disease. Gastroenterology. 2002;123:999-1005.
56. Fireman Z, Mahajna E, Broide E, et al. Diagnosing small bowel Crohn's disease with wireless capsule endoscopy. Gut. 2003;52:390-392.
57. Eliakim R, Fischer D, Suissa A, et al. Wireless capsule video endoscopy is a superior diagnostic tool in comparison to barium follow-through and computerized tomography in patients with suspected Crohn's disease. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003;15:363-367.
58. Liangpunsakul S, Chadalawada V, Rex DK, et al. Wireless capsule endoscopy detects small bowel ulcers in patients with normal results from state of the art enteroclysis. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. 2003;98:1295-1298.
59. Gölder SK, Schreyer AG, Kullmann F, et al. Clinical value of video capsule endoscopy (VCE) and small bowel MR-Imaging (sbMRI) in suspected small bowel disease. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;57:162. [abstract]
60. Molnar T, Papos M, Gyulai C, et al. Clinical value of technetium-99m-HMPAO-labeled leukocyte scintigraphy and spiral computed tomography in active Crohn's disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;96:1517-1521.
61. Kolkman JJ, Falke TH, Roos JC, et al. Computed tomography and granulocyte scintigraphy in active inflammatory bowel disease. Comparison with endoscopy and operative findings. Dig Dis Sci. 1996;41:641-650.
62. Madsen SM, Thomsen HS, Munkholm P, et al. Inflammatory bowel disease evaluated by low-field magnetic resonance imaging. Comparison with endoscopy, 99mTc-HMPAO leucocyte scintigraphy, conventional radiography and surgery. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2002;37:307-316.
63. Neurath MF, Vehling D, Schunk K, et al. Noninvasive assessment of Crohn's disease activity: a comparison of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography, hydromagnetic resonance imaging, and granulocyte scintigraphy with labeled antibodies. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97: 1978-1985.
64. Madsen SM, Thomsen HS, Munkholm P, et al. Active Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis evaluated by low-field magnetic resonance imaging. Scand J Gastroenterol, 1998;33:1193-1200.
65. Vining DJ, Liu K, Choplin RH, et al. Virtual bronchoscopy. Relationships of virtual reality endobronchial simulations to actual bronchoscopic findings. Chest. 1996;109:549-553.
66. Schreyer AG, Fielding JR, Warfield SK, et al. Virtual CT cystoscopy: color mapping of bladder wall thickness. Invest Radiol. 2000;35:331-334.
67. Schreyer AG, Seitz J, Strutz J, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging-based virtual endoscopy of inner ear pathology. Otol Neurotol. 2002;23:136-140.
68. Halligan S, Fenlon HM. Virtual colonoscopy. BMJ. 1999;319:1249-1252.
69. Luboldt W, Fletcher JG, Vogl TJ. Colonography: current status, research directions and challenges. Update 2002. Eur Radiol. 2002;12:502-524.
70. Schreyer AG, Seitz J. A Comparison of MRI based colonography with conventional colonoscopy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology. 2003;124:A556. [abstract]
71. Schreyer AG, Herfarth H, Kikinis R, et al. 3D modeling and virtual endoscopy of the small bowel based on magnetic resonance imaging in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Invest Radiol. 2002;37:528-533.
72. Schwartz DA, Loftus EV Jr, Tremaine WJ, et al. The natural history of fistulizing Crohn's disease in Olmsted County. Minnesota. Gastroenterology. 2002;122:875-880.
73. Hellers G, Bergstrand O, Ewerth S, et al. Occurrence and outcome after primary treatment of anal fistulae in Crohn's disease, Gut. 1980;21:525-527.
74. Rankin GB, Watts HD, MeInyk CS, et al. National ooperative Crohn's disease study: extraintestinal manifestations and perianal complications. Gastroenterology. 1979;77:914-920.
75. Parks AG, Gordon PH, Hardcastle JD. A classification of fistula-in-ano. Br J Surg. 1976;63:1-12.
76. Marks CG, Ritchie JK. Anal fistulas at St Mark's Hospital. Br J Surg. 1977;64:84-91.
77. Kuijpers HC, Schulpen T. Fistulography for fistula-in-ano. Is it useful? Dis Colon Rectum. 1985;28:103-104.
78. Bartram C, Buchanan G. Imaging anal fistula. Radial Clin North Am. 2003;41:443-457.
79. Morris J, Spencer JA, Ambrose NS. MR imaging classification of perianal fistulas and its implications for patient management. Radiographics. 2000;20:623-635.
80. Berliner L, Redmond P, Purow E, et al. Computed tomography in Crohn's disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 1982;77:548-553.
81. Schratter-Sehn AU, Lochs H, Vogelsang H, et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography versus computed tomography in the differential diagnosis of perianorectal complications in Crohn's disease. Endoscopy. 1993;25:582-586.
82. Schwartz DA, Wiersema MJ, Dudiak KM, et al. A comparison of endoscopic ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and exam under anesthesia for evaluation of Crohn's perianal fistulas. Gastroenterology. 2001; 121:1064-1072.
83. Orsoni P, Barthet M, Portier F, et al. Prospective comparison of endosonography, magnetic resonance imaging and surgical findings in anorectal fistula and abscess complicating Crohn's disease. Br J Surg. 1999;86: 360-364.
84. Bell SJ, Halligan S, Windsor AC, et al. Response of fistulating Crohn's disease to infliximab treatment assessed by magnetic resonance imaging. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003;17:387-393.
85. Van Assche G, Vanbeckevoort D, Bielen D, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the effects of infliximab on perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98:332-339.
86. Buchanan G, Halligan S, Williams A, et al. Effect of MRI on clinical outcome of recurrent fistula-in-ano. Lancet 2002;360:1661-2.
87. Nitz WR. Fast and ultrafast non-echo-planar MR imaging techniques. Eur Radiol. 2002;12:2866-2882.
88. Fletcher JG, Johnson CD, Reed JE, et al. Feasibility of planar virtual pathology: a new paradigm in volume-rendered CT colonography. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2001;25:864-869.
89. Best WR, Becktel JM, Singleton JW. Rederived values of the eight coefficients of the Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI). Gastroenterology. 1979;77:843-846.
90. Lichtenstein GR, Schnall M, Herlinger H. MRI evaluation of Crohn disease activity. Abdom Imaging. 2000;25:229.
91. Ott DJ. MR imaging of Crohn's disease: what is the attraction? Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98:211-212.
92. Hiraishi K, Narabayashi I, Fujita O, et al. Blueberry juice: preliminary evaluation as an oral contrast agent in gastrointestinal MR imaging. Radiology. 1995;194:119-123.
93. Sato S. A study of green tea for a positive gastrointestinal MR imaging enhancing agent. Nippon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi. 1994;54:876-885.
94. Philpotts L, Heiken J, Westcoft M, et al. Colitis: use of CT findings in differential diagnosis. Radiology. 1994;190:445-449.