Review of options for structural design sensitivity analysis. Part 1: Linear systems

Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering

Volumn 194, Issue 30-33 SPEC. ISS., 2005, Pages 3213-3243

  van Keulen, F ^a   Haftka, R T ^b   Kim, N H ^b  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Design sensitivites; Linear statics; Review; Shape design variables; Structural response derivatives; Transient analysis

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; CONTINUUM MECHANICS; FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD; LINEAR SYSTEMS; PROBLEM SOLVING; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

COMPUTATIONAL COSTS; CONTINUUM DERIVATIVES; GLOBAL FINITE DIFFERENCES; NONLINEAR STRUCTURAL PROBLEMS;

STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS;

MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 20044391472     PISSN: 00457825     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2005.02.002     Document Type: Article

References (239)

1. R.T. Haftka H.M. Adelman Recent developments in structural sensitivity analysis Struct. Optim. 1 1989 137-151
2. B.M. Kwak A review on shape optimal design and sensitivity analysis Struct. Engrg./Earthq. Engrg. 10 4 1994 159s-174s
3. Y.L. Hsu A review of structural shape optimization Comput. Ind. 26 1994 3-13
4. J.C. Newman A.C. Taylor R.W. Barnwell P.A. Newman G.J.W. Hou Overview of sensitivity analysis and shape optimization for complex aerodynamic configurations J. Aircraft 36 1 1999 87-96
5. J.P.C. Kleijnen Sensitivity analysis and related analyses: A review of some statistical techniques J. Statist. Comput. Simul. 57 1997 111-142
6. K.K. Choi N.H. Kim Structural Sensitivity Analysis and Optimization Linear Systems vol. 1 2004 Springer-Verlag New York
7. K.K. Choi N.H. Kim Structural Sensitivity Analysis and Optimization Nonlinear Systems and Applications vol. 2 2004 Springer-Verlag New York
8. J. Sobieszczanski-Sobieski Sensitivity of complex, internally coupled systems AIAA J. 28 1 1990 153-160
9. A.A. Guinta, Sensitivity analysis for coupled aero-structural systems, Technical Report TM-1999-209367, NASA, 1999.
10. G.J.-W. Hou, A. Satyanarayana, Analytical sensitivity analysis of a static aeroelastic wing, in: 8th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, AIAA 2000-4824, 6-8 September 2000, Long Beach, CA.
11. K. Maute, M. Nikbay, C. Farhat, Analytically based sensitivity analysis and optimization of nonlinear aeroelastic systems, in: 8th AIAA/USAF/ NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, AIAA 2000-4825, 6-8 September 2000, Long Beach, CA.
12. V.V. Saurin Shape design sensitivity analysis for fracture conditions Comput. Struct. 76 2000 399-405
13. E. Taroco Shape sensitivity analysis in linear elastic fracture mechanics Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 188 2000 697-712
14. R.A. Feijóo C. Padra R. Saliba E. Taroco M.J. Vénere Shape sensitivity analysis for energy release rate evaluation and its application to the study of three-dimensional cracked bodies Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 188 2000 649-664
15. N.H. Kim J. Dong K.K. Choi N. Vlahopoulos Z.-D. Ma M.P. Castanier C. Pierre Design sensitivity analysis for sequential structural-acoustic problems J. Sound Vib. 263 3 2003 569-591
16. N.H. Kim J. Dong K.K. Choi Energy flow analysis and design sensitivity of structural problems at high frequencies J. Sound Vib. 269 1-2 2004 213-250
17. K.K. Choi I. Shim S. Wang Design sensitivity analysis of structure-induced noise and vibration J. Vib. Acoust. 119 1997 173-179
18. M. Papadrakakis Y. Tsompanakis E. Hinton J. Sienz Advanced solution methods in topology optimization and shape sensitivity analysis Engrg. Comput. 13 5 1996 57-90
19. K. Maute M. Nikbay C. Farhat Sensitivity analysis and design optimization of three-dimensional non-linear aeroelastic systems by the adjoint method Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 56 6 2003 911-933
20. T.S. Kim J.E. Kim Y.Y. Kim Parallelized structural topology optimization for eigenvalue problems Int. J. Solid Struct. 41 (9/10) 2004 2623-2641
21. S.J. Leary A. Bhaskar A.J. Keane Global approximation and optimization using adjoint computational fluid dynamics codes AIAA J. 42 3 2004 631-641
22. O.O. Storaasli, D.T. Nguyen, M. Baddourah, J. Qin, Computational mechanics analysis tools for parallel-vector supercomputers, in: 34th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, La Jolla, CA, USA, 19-22 April 1993, AIAA, pp. 772-778.
23. B.C. Watson A.K. Noor Sensitivity analysis of frictional contact/impact response on distributed-memory computers Comput. Struct. 65 6 1997 881-891
24. I. Takewaki K. Uetani Efficient redesign of damped large structural systems via domain decomposition with exact dynamic condensation Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 178 3 1999 367-382
25. M. Aleksa S. Russenschuck C. Vollinger Parametric quadrilateral meshes for the design and optimization of superconducting magnets IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 12 1 2002 1404-1407
26. L.A. Schemit Y.C. Lai Structural optimization based on preconditioned conjugate gradient analysis methods Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 37 6 1994 943-964
27. C. Vuik Fast iterative solvers for the discretized incompressible Navier-Stokes equations Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 22 1996 195-210
28. C. Vuik A. Segal J.A. Meijerink An efficient preconditioned cg method for the solution of a class of layered problems with extreme contrasts in the coefficients J. Comput. Phys. 152 1999 385-403
29. J. Frank C. Vuik On the construction of deflation-based preconditioners SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 23 2 2001 442-462
30. M.A. Akgün J.H. Garcelon R.T. Haftka Fast exact linear and nonlinear structural reanalysis and the Sherman-Morrison-Woodbury formulas Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 50 7 2001 1587-1606
31. B.G. Yoon A.D. Belegundu Iterative methods for design sensitivity analysis AIAA J. 26 11 1988 1413-1415
32. U. Kirsch S. Liu Structural reanalysis for general layout modifications AIAA J. 35 1997 382-388
33. S. Oral An improved semianalytical method for sensitivity analysis Struct. Optim. 11 1996 67-69
34. H.R.E.M. Hörnlein Effiziente semi-analytische gradientenberechnung in der strukturoptimierung Z. Angew. Math. Mech. 81 2000 s669-s670
35. U. Kirsch Design-oriented Analysis: A Unified Approach 2002 Kluwer
36. R.T. Haftka Semi-analytical static nonlinear structural sensitivity analysis AIAA J. 31 1993 1307-1312
37. B.Y. Lee Consideration of body forces in axisymmetric design sensitivity analysis using the BEM Comput. Struct. 61 4 1996 587-596
38. B.Y. Lee Direct differentiation formulation for boundary element shape sensitivity analysis of axisymmetric elastic solids Int. J. Solid Struct. 34 1 1997 99-112
39. N.H. Kim, K.K. Choi, Design sensitivity analysis and optimization of nonlinear transient dynamics, in: 8th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, AIAA 2000-4905, 6-8 September 2000, Long Beach, CA.
40. F. Navarrina S. López-Fontán I. Colominas E. Bendito M. Casteleiro High order shape design sensitivities: A unified approach Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 188 2000 681-696
41. K.K. Choi W. Duan Design sensitivity analysis and shape optimization of structural components with hyperelastic material Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 187 2000 219-243
42. S. Mukherjee X. Shi Y.X. Mukherjee Internal variables and their sensitivities in three-dimensional linear elasticity by the boundary contour method Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 187 2000 289-306
43. D.A. Tortorelli R.B. Haber S.C.-Y. Lu Adjoint sensitivity analysis for nonlinear dynamic thermoelastic systems AIAA J. 29 2 1991 253-263
44. J.S. Arora T.-H. Lee J.B. Cardoso Structural shape sensitivity analysis: relationship between material derivative and control volume approaches AIAA J. 30 6 1992 1638-1648
45. J.S. Arora An exposition of the material derivative approach for structural shape sensitivity analysis Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 105 1993 41-62
46. D.G. Phelan R.B. Haber Sensitivity analysis of linear elastic systems using domain parametrization and a mixed mutual energy principle Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 77 1989 31-59
47. N.H. Kim, Y. Chang, Eulerian shape design optimization with fixed grid, in: 44th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/ASC Structure, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, AIAA 2003-1634, 7-10 April 2003, Norfolk, VA.
48. C. Bischof, A. Carle, Automatic differentiation - principles, tools, and applications in sensitivity analysis, in: K. Chan, S. Tarantola, F. Campolongo (Eds.), Second International Symposium on Sensitivity Analysis of Model Output, 19-22 April 1998, Venice, Ca'Dolfin, pp. 33-36.
49. P.C. Pandey P. Bakshi Analytical response sensitivity computation using hybrid finite elements Comput. Struct. 71 1999 525-534
50. D.W. Stillman, Design sensitivity analysis for structures using explicit time integration, in: 8th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, AIAA 2000-4906, 6-8 September 2000, Long Beach, CA.
51. J.S. Moita J. Infanta Barbosa C.M. Mota Soares C.A. Mota Soares Sensitivity analysis and optimal design of geometrically non-linear laminated plates and shells Comput. Struct. 76 2000 407-420
52. R. Fortunier, F. Thevon, J.D. Beley, Parametric finite element analysis: a new design method to shorten time to market, in: Proceedings of the EUROMAT Conference, 1997, Maastricht, p. 1524.
53. M.J. Poldneff I.S. Rai J.S. Arora Implementation of design sensitivity analysis for nonlinear structures AIAA J. 31 11 1993 2137-2142
54. S. Kibsgaard Sensitivity analysis - the basis for optimization Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 34 1992 901-932
55. C.H. Bischof H.M. Bücker B. Lang A. Rasch J.W. Risch Extending the functionality of the general-purpose finite element package sepran by automatic differentiation Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 58 2003 2225-2238
56. L.L. Sherman, A.C. Taylor, L.L. Green, P.A. Newman, G.J.-W. Hou, V.M. Korivi, First- and second-order aerodynamic sensitivity derivatives via automatic differentiation with incremental iterative methods, in: 5th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, AIAA 94-4262, 7-9 September 1994, Panama City Beach, FL.
57. I. Ozaki F. Kimura M. Berz Higher-order sensitivity analysis of finite element method by automatic differentiation Comput. Mech. 16 1995 223-234
58. B.A. Wujek J.E. Renaud Automatic differentiation for more efficient system analysis and optimization Engrg. Optim. 31 1998 101-139
59. C. Bischof A. Carle P. Khademi A. Mauer The ADIFOR 2.0 system for the automatic differentiation of Fortran 77 programs IEEE Comput. Sci. Engrg. 3 1996 18-32
60. A. Griewank D. Juedes J. Utke ADOL-C, a package for the automatic differentiation of algorithms written in C/C++ TOMS 22 2 1996 131-167
61. D. Shiriaev A. Griewank ADOL-F: Automatic differentiation of Fortran codes Comput. Differentiat. Tech. Appl. Tools 1 1996 375-384
62. J.R.R.A. Martins, P. Sturdza, J.J. Alonso, The connection between the complex-step derivative approximation and algorithmic differentiation, AIAA 2001-0921, in: Proceedings of the 39th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, NV, January 2001.
63. J.N. Lyness C.B. Moler Numerical differentiation of analytic functions SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 4 1967 202-210
64. J.N. Lyness Numerical algorithms based on the theory of complex variables in: Proceedings of the ACM 22nd notationaconference 1967 Thomas Book, Co. Washington, DC pp. 124-134
65. W. Squire G. Trapp Using complex variable to estimate derivatives of real functions SIAM Rev. 40 1 1998 110-112
66. J.C. Newman, D.L. Whitfield, W.K. Anderson, A step-size independent approach for multidisciplinary sensitivity analysis and design optimization, in: 17th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, 28 June-1 July 1999, pp. 12-22.
67. J.R.R.A. Martins, I.M. Kroo, J.J. Alonso, An automated method for sensitivity analysis using complex variables, in: AIAA 38th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno NV, AIAA Paper 2000-0689, 2000.
68. G. Bugeda E. Onate Optimum aerodynamic shape design including mesh adaptivity Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 20 1995 915-934
69. K.K. Choi S.-L. Twu Equivalence of continuum and discrete methods of shape design sensitivity analysis AIAA J. 27 10 1989 1418-1424
70. S.K. Nadarajah, A. Jameson, A comparison of the continuous and discrete adjoint approach to automatic aerodynamic optimization, in: AIAA 38th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, AIAA Paper No. 2000-0667, January 2000.
71. M.D. Gunzburger Sensitivities, adjoints and flow optimization Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 31 1999 53-58
72. B. Barthelemy, R.T. Haftka, Accuracy analysis of the semi-analytical method for shape sensitivity, in: Proceedings of AIAA/ASME/ASCE/ASC 29th Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Williamsburg, VA, 18-20 April 1988, pp. 88-2284.
73. B. Barthelemy C.T. Chon R.T. Haftka Accuracy problems associated with semi-analytical derivatives of static response in: Presented at the First World Congress on Computational Mechanics, Austin, TX, September 1986 Finite Element Anal. Des. 4 1988 249-265
74. H.P. Mlejnek Accuracy of semi-analytical sensitivities and its improvement by the natural method Struct. Optim. 4 1992 128-131
75. N. Olhoff J. Rasmussen E. Lund A method of "exact" numerical differentiation for error elimination in finite-element-based semi-analytical shape sensitivity analyses Mech. Struct. Mach. 21 1993 1-66
76. F. van Keulen H. de Boer Rigorous improvement of semi-analytical design sensitivities by exact differentiation of rigid body motions Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 42 1998 71-91
77. H. de Boer F. vanKeulen Refined semi-analytical design sensitivities Int. J. Solid Struct. 37 46-47 2000 6961-6980
78. K. Vervenne, Design sensitivity analysis, Technical report, Delft University of Technology, LTM 1234, 2000.
79. J. Borggaard A. Verma On efficient solutions to the continuous sensitivity equation using structured automatic differentiation SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 22 1 2000 39-62
80. A. Sandu, G.R. Charmichael, F.A. Potra, Sensitivity analysis for atmospheric chemistry via automatic differentiation, Paper presented at SAMO 95, Belgirate, Italy, 25-27 September 1995.
81. P. Krishnaswami, Symbolic computing and automatic differentiation for sensitivity analysis, in: Optimization in Industry-1997, ASME, 1997, pp. 103-108.
82. T. Burczynski J.H. Kane C. Balakrishna Comparison of shape design sensitivity analysis formulations via material derivative-adjoint variable and implicit differentiation techniques for 3-d and 2-d curved boundary element Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 142 1997 89-109
83. J. Borggaard J. Burns A pde sensitivity equation method for optimal aerodynamical design J. Comput. Phys. 136 1997 366-384
84. K. Dems R.T. Haftka Two approaches to sensitivity analysis for shape variation of structures Mech. Struct. Mach. 16 1989 501-522
85. T. Lindby J.L.T. Santos 2-d and 3-d shape optimization using mesh velocities to integrate analytical sensitivities with associative cad Struct. Optim. 13 1997 213-222
86. Z. Erman R.T. Fenner Three-dimensional design sensitivity analysis using a boundary integral approach Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 40 1997 637-654
87. A. Carle, M. Fagan, L.L. Green, Preliminary results from the application of automated adjoint code generation to CFL3D, in: 7th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, volume Part 2, AIAA 98-4807, 2-4 September 1998, pp. 807-817.
88. J.L. Walsh, K.C. Young, F.J. Tarzanin, J.E. Hirsh, D.E. Young, Optimization issues with complex rotorcraft comprehensive analysis, in: 7th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, volume Part 2, AIAA 98-4889, 2-4 September 1998.
89. H. Hu, sensitivity derivatives of a rotor CFD code via automatic differentiation, in: 7th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, volume Part 1, AIAA 98-4724, pages 159-164, September 2-4 1998.
90. M.A. Akgün R.T. Haftka K.C. Wu J.L. Walsh Sensitivity of lumped constraints using the adjoint method AIAA J. 39 3 2001 511-516
91. B.M. Barthelemy R.T. Haftka G.A. Cohen Physically based sensitivity derivatives for structural analysis programs Comput. Mech. 4 6 1989 465-476
92. K.H. Chang K.K. Choi C.S. Tsai B.S. Choi X.M. Yu Design sensitivity analysis and optimization tool (DSO) for shape design applications Comput. System Engrg. 6 2 1995 151-175
93. T.J.R. Hughes The Finite Element Method 1987 Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ
94. E.J. Haug K.K. Choi V. Komkov Design sensitivity analysis of structural systems 1986 Academic Press New York
95. W.H. Greene R.T. Haftka Computational aspects of sensitivity calculations in transient structural analysis Comput. Struct. 32 1989 433-443
96. M.A. Kramer J.M. Calo H. Rabitz An improved computational method for sensitivity analysis: Green's function method with aim Appl. Math. Model. 5 1981 432-441
97. Haftka Z. Gürdal Elements of Structural Optimization second revised edition 1990 Kluwer Academic Publishers
98. M.J. Poldneff J.S. Arora Design sensitivity analysis in dynamic thermoviscoelasticity with implicit integration Int. J. Solid Struct. 33 4 1996 577-594
99. S. Cho K.K. Choi Design sensitivity analysis and optimization of non-linear transient dynamics. Part I - Sizing design Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 48 2000 351-373
100. N.H. Kim K.K. Choi Design sensitivity analysis and optimization of nonlinear transient dynamics Mech. Struct. Mach. 29 3 2001 351-371
101. R.T. Haftka D.S. Malkus Calculation of sensitivity derivatives in thermal problems by finite differences Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 17 1981 1811-1821
102. G.D. Pollock A.K. Noor Sensitivity analysis of the contact/impact response of composite structures Comput. Struct. 61 2 1996 251-269
103. E.J. Haug N.K. Mani P. Krishnaswami in: E.J. Haug Ed. Design sensitivity analysis and optimization of dynamically driven systems 1984 Springer Berlin pp. 555-636
104. L. Karaoǧlan A.K. Noor Dynamic sensitivity analysis of frictional contact/impact response of axisymmetric composite structures Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 128 1995 169-190
105. R.T. Haftka Techniques for thermal sensitivity analysis Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 17 1981 71-80
106. P. Michaleris D.A. Tortorelli C.A. Vidal Tangent operators and design sensitivity formulations for transient non-linear coupled problems with applications to elastoplasticity Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 37 1994 2471-2499
107. S. Chen J.M. Hansen D.A. Tortorelli Unconditionally energy stable implicit time integration: Application to multibody system analysis and design Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 48 2000 791-822
108. T.V. Nguyen A. Devgan O.J. Nastov D.W. Winston Transient sensitivity computation in controlled explicit piecewise linear simulation IEEE Trans. Comp.-Aided Des. Integr. Circ. Syst. 19 1 2000 98-110
109. C.C. Wu J.S. Arora Design sensitivity analysis and optimization of nonlinear structural response using incremental procedure AIAA J. 25 1987 1118-1125
110. C.C. Wu J.S. Arora Design sensitivity analysis of non-linear buckling load Comput. Mech. 3 1988 129-140
111. E. Lund N. Olhoff Shape design sensitivity analysis of eigenvalues using "exact" numerical differentiation of finite element matrices Struct. Optim. 8 1994 52-59
112. A.M. Spence R. Celi Efficient sensitivity analysis for rotary-wing aeromechanical problems AIAA J. 32 12 1994 2337-2344
113. W.H. Zhang M. Domaszewski Efficient sensitivity analysis and optimization of shell structures by the ABAQUS code Struct. Optim. 18 1999 173-182
114. J.W. Langelaan E. Livne Analytic sensitivities and design oriented structural analysis for airplane fuselage shape synthesis Comput. Struct. 62 3 1997 505-519
115. G. Cheng Y. Gu Y. Zhou Accuracy of semi-analytic sensitivity analysis Finite Element Anal. Des. 6 1989 113-128
116. P. Pedersen G. Cheng J. Rasmussen On accuracy problems for semi-analytical sensitivity analyses Mech. Struct. Mach. 17 1989 373-384
117. P. Fenyes R.V. Lust Error analysis of semianalytic displacement derivatives for shape and sizing variables AIAA J. 29 1991 271-279
118. N. Olhoff J. Rasmussen Study of inaccuracy in semi-analytical sensitivity analysis - a model problem Struct. Optim. 3 1991 203-213
119. G. Cheng N. Olhoff Rigid body motion test against error in semi-analytical sensitivity analysis Comput. Struct. 46 1993 515-527
120. F. van Keulen K. Vervenne H. de Boer Accuracy improvement of semi-analytical design sensitivities - an overview of recent developments in: O.M. Querin (Ed.) Proceedings of 3rd ASMO-UK/ISSMO conference Harrogate, North Yorkshire, 9-10 July 2001 Engineering Design Optimization, Product and Process Improvement 2001 University Press Leeds pp. 227-236
121. G. Cheng Y. Gu X. Wang Improvement of semi-analytical analysis and mcads in: H.A. Eschenhauer C. Mattheck N. Olhoff (Eds.) Engineering optimization in design processes 1991 Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, New York pp. 211-223
122. H. de Boer F. van Keulen Error analysis of refined semi-analytical design sensitivities Struct. Optim. 14 1997 242-247
123. J. Argyris, H.P. Mlejnek, Die Methode der Finiten Elemente, vol. I: Verschiebungsmethode in der Statik, Braunschweig, Vieweg, 1986 (in German).
124. E. Hinton J. Sienz S.M.B. Afonso Experiences with Olhoff's " exact" semi-analytical sensitivity algorithm in: N. Olhoff G.I.N. Rozvany (Eds.) WCSMO-1, First world congress of structural and multidisciplinary optimization 1995 Pergamon pp. 41-46
125. F. van Keulen, H. de Boer, Refined semi-analytical design sensitivities for buckling, in: 7th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, volume Part 1, AIAA 98-4761, 2-4 September 1998, pp 420-429.
126. H. de Boer, F. van Keulen, Refined second order semi-analytical design sensitivities, in: Proceedings of the Third World Congress of Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 17-21 May 1999, Buffalo, New York, CD-ROM (Paper 12-SAM-4).
127. E. Parente L.E. Vaz Improvement of semi-analytical design sensitivities of nonlinear structures using equilibrium relations Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 50 9 2001 2127-2142
128. J.E. Bernard S.K. Kwon J.A. Wilson Differentiation of mass and stiffness matrices for high order sensitivity calculations in finite element-based equilibrium problems Trans. ASME 115 1993 829-832
129. P. Bakshi P.C. Pandey Semi-analytic sensitivities using hybrid finite elements Comput. Struct. 77 2000 201-213
130. K. Vervenne, F. van Keulen, Accuracy improvement of semi-analytical design sensitivities by Laplacian smoothing, in: 42nd Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference and Exhibit, AIAA 2001-1497, A01-25415, Seattle, WA, 16-19 April 2001, AIAA.
131. W.-H. Zhang P. Beckers C. Fleury A unified parametric design approach to structural shape optimization Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 38 1995 2283-2292
132. C.H. Tseng J.S. Arora Numerical verification of design sensitivity analysis AIAA J. 27 1 1989 117-119
133. K. Tai R.T. Fenner Numerical study of some approaches to shape design sensitivity analysis using boundary elements J. Strain Anal. 31 5 1996 361-369
134. J. Borggaard, J. Burns, Asymptotically consistent gradients in optimal design, in: Multidisciplinary Design Optimization, State of the Art, Proceedings of the ICASE/NASA Langley Workshop on Multidisciplinary Design Optimization, Hampton, Virginia, 13-16 March 1995, pp. 303-314.
135. J.H. Kane K.G. Prasad Boundary formulations for sensitivity analysis without matrix derivatives AIAA J. 31 9 1993 1731-1734
136. L.A. Godoy E.O. Taroco Design sensitivity of post-buckling states including material constraints Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 188 2000 665-679
137. H. de Boer, F. van Keulen, Improved semi-analytic design sensitivities for a linear and finite rotation shell element, in: W. Gutkowski, Z. Mróz (Eds.), WCSMO-2, Second World Congress of Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 1997, pp. 199-204.
138. D.E. Smith D.A. Tortorelli C.L. Tucker Optimal design for polymer extrusion. Part II: Sensitivity analysis for weakly-coupled nonlinear steady-state systems Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 167 1998 303-323
139. M.S. Joun S.M. Hwang Die shape optimal design in three-dimensional shape metal extrusion by the finite element method Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 41 1998 311-335
140. H. Møller, E. Lund, Shape sensitivity analysis of strongly coupled fluid-structure interaction problems, in: 8th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, AIAA 2000-4823, 6-8 September 2000, Long Beach, CA.
141. L.A. Jakobsen, H. Møller, E. Lund, Sensitivity analysis of convection dominated steady 2d fluid flow using supg fem, in: 8th AIAA/ USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, AIAA 2000-4822, 6-8 September 2000, Long Beach, CA.
142. G. Cheng, N. Olhoff, New method of error analysis and detection in semi-analytic sensitivity analysis, in: G.I.N. Rozvany (Ed.), Lecture Notes, NATO/DFG/ASI Optimization of Large Structural Systems, vol. 1, 23 September-4 October 1991, pp. 234-267.
143. I. Ozaki T. Terano Applying an automatic differentiation technique to sensitivity analysis in design optimization problems Finite Element Anal. Des. 14 1993 143-151
144. C. Faure, C. Ducal, Automatic differentiation for sensitivity analysis, a test case, in: K. Chan, S. Tarantola, F. Campolongo (Eds.), Second International Symposium on Sensitivity Analysis of Model Output, Venice, Ca'Dolfin, 19-22 April 1998, pp. 107-110.
145. H. Hu Application of an automatic differentiation method to a 2d Navier- Stokes CFD code Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 156 1998 179-183
146. A.C. Limache, E.M. Cliff, Aerodynamic sensitivity theory for rotary stability derivatives, in: AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference, Portland, OR, 911 August 1999, AIAA 99-4313.
147. L.B. Rall G.F. Corliss An introduction to automatic differentiation Comput. Differentiat.: Tech. Appl. Tools 1996 1-18
148. C.-J. Chen K.K. Choi Continuum approach for second-order shape design sensitivity of three-dimensional elastic solids AIAA J. 32 10 1994 2099-2107
149. F.-J. Barthold E. Stein A continuum mechanical-based formulation of the variational sensitivity analysis in structural optimization. Part I: Analysis Struct. Optim. 11 1996 29-42
150. H.-Y. Hwang K.K. Choi K.-H. Chang Second-order shape design sensitivity using p-version finite element analysis Struct. Optim. 14 1997 91-99
151. P. Kolakowski J. Holnicki-Szulc Sensitivity analysis of truss structures (virtual distortion method approach) Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 43 1998 1085-1108
152. H.W. Kim D.S. Bae K.K. Choi Configuration design sensitivity analysis of kinematic responses of mechanical systems Mech. Struct. Mach. 27 2 1999 203-215
153. É Turgeon, D. Pelletier, J. Borggaard, A general continuous sensitivity equation formulation for complex flows, in: 8th AIAA/USAF/ NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, AIAA 2000-4732, 6-8 September 2000, Long Beach, CA.
154. É Turgeon, D. Pelletier, J. Borggaard, B. Ozell, A continuous sensitivity equation method for flows with temperature dependent properties, in: 8th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, AIAA 2000-4821, 6-8 September 2000, Long Beach, CA.
155. E. Rohan J.R. Whiteman Shape optimization of elasto-plastic structures and continua Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 187 2000 261-288
156. M. Souli J.P. Zolesio A. Ouahsine Shape optimization for non-smooth geometry in two dimensions Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 188 2000 109-119
157. J.A. Brandon Second-order design sensitivities to assess the applicability of sensitivity analysis AIAA J. 29 1 1991 135-139
158. M.I. Friswell Calculation of second and higher order eigenvector derivatives J. Guidance 18 4 1995 919-921
159. L.A. Godoy E.O. Taroco R.A. Feijoo Second-order sensitivity analysis in vibration and buckling problems Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 37 1994 3999-4014
160. J. Borggaard, D. Pelletier, On adaptive shape sensitivity calculations for optimal design, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., submitted for publication.
161. J. Borggaard D. Pelletier Observations in adaptive refinement strategies for optimal design in: J. Borggaard J. Burns E. Cliff S. Schreck (Eds.) Computational methods for optimal design and control 1998 Birkhauser pp. 59-76
162. J. Borggaard, D. Pelletier, Optimal shape design in forced convection using adaptive finite elements, AIAA 98-0908, in: AIAA 36th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno NV, 1998.
163. N.H. Kim K.K. Choi J.S. Chen Y.H. Park Meshless shape design sensitivity analysis and optimization for contact problem with friction Comput. Mech. 25 2-3 2000 157-168
164. N.H. Kim K.K. Choi J.S. Chen Shape design sensitivity analysis and optimization of elasto-plasticity with frictional contact AIAA J. 38 9 2000 1742-1753
165. N.H. Kim K. Yi K.K. Choi A material derivative approach in design sensitivity analysis of 3-d contact problems Int. J. Solid Struct. 39 8 2002 2087-2108
166. N.H. Kim Y.H. Park K.K. Choi Optimization of a hyperelastic structure with multibody contact using continuum-based shape design sensitivity analysis Struct. Optim. 21 3 2001 196-208
167. N.H. Kim K.K. Choi J.S. Chen Die shape design optimization of sheet metal stamping process using meshfree method Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 51 12 2001 1385-1405
168. T. Ting Design sensitivity analysis of structural frequency response AIAA J. 31 10 1992 1965-1967
169. Y. Zhang D.T. Nguyen J.W. Hou An alternative formulation for design sensitivity analysis of linear structural dynamic systems Comput. Struct. 44 3 1992 689-692
170. A.G. Nalecz J. Wicher Design sensitivity analysis of mechanical systems in frequency domain J. Sound Vib. 120 3 1988 517-526
171. R.M. Lin M.K. Lim Structural sensitivity analysis via reduced-order analytical model Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 121 1995 345-359
172. R.M. Lin H. Du J.H. Ong Sensitivity based method for structural dynamic model improvement Comput. Struct. 47 3 1993 349-369
173. A.L. Andrew R.C.E. Tan Computation of derivatives of repeated eigenvalues and corresponding eigenvectors by simultaneous iteration AIAA J. 34 10 1996 2214-2216
174. A.L. Andrew R.C.E. Tan Computation of mixed partial derivatives of eigenvalues and eigenvectors by simultaneous iteration Commun. Numer. Methods Engrg. 15 1999 641-649
175. C. Cardani P. Mantegazza Calculation of eigenvalue and eigenvector derivatives for algebraic flutter and divergence eigenproblems AIAA J. 17 4 1979 408-412
176. T. Chen Design sensitivity analysis for repeated eigenvalues in structural design AIAA J. 31 12 1993 2347-2350
177. K.K. Choi E.J. Haug H.G. Seong An iterative method for finite dimensional structural optimization problems with repeated eigenvalues Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 19 1983 93-112
178. R.L. Dailey Eigenvector derivatives with repeated eigenvalues AIAA J. 27 4 1989 486-491
179. E.J. Haug K.K. Choi Systematic occurrence of repeated eigenvalues in structural optimization J. Optim. Theory Appl. 38 2 1982 251-274
180. R.M. Lin Z. Wang M.K. Lim A practical algorithm for the efficient computation of eigenvector sensitivities Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 130 1996 355-367
181. R.L. Fox M.P. Kapoor Rates of change of eigenvalues and eigenvectors AIAA J. 6 12 1968 2426-2429
182. M.S. Jankovic Exact nth derivatives of eigenvalues and eigenvectors J. Guid. Control Dynam. 17 1 1994 136-144
183. K. Kim D.V. Wallerstein Modal design sensitivities for multiple eigenvalues Comput. Struct. 29 5 1988 755-762
184. H.C. Mateus H.C. Rodrigues C.M. Mota Soares C.A. Mota Soares Sensitivity analysis and optimization of thin laminated structures with a nonsmooth eigenvalue based criterion Struct. Optim. 14 1997 219-224
185. W.C. Mills-Curran Calculation of eigenvector derivatives for structures with repeated eigenvalues AIAA J. 26 7 1988 867-871
186. W.C. Mills-Curran Comment on "eigenvector derivatives with repeated eigenvalues" AIAA J. 28 10 1990 1846
187. N. Olhoff, E. Lund, A.P. Seyranian, Sensitivity analysis and optimization of multiple eigenvalues in structural design problems, in: Proceedings of the AIAA/NASA/USAF/ISMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Part 1, 1994, AIAA, pp. 625-640.
188. V.F. Poterasu Approximate method to compute the eigenvalues and eigensensitivities of mechanical systems Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 109 1993 183-192
189. A.R. Robinson J.F. Harris Improving approximate eigenvalues and eigenvectors in: Proceedings of the American Society of Civil Engineers, EM J. Engrg. Mech. Div. EM 2 1971 457-475
190. L.C. Rogers Derivatives of eigenvalues and eigenvectors AIAA J. 8 5 1970 943-944
191. C.S. Rudisill Y.Y. Chu Numerical methods for evaluating the derivatives of eigenvalues and eigenvectors AIAA J. 13 6 1975 834-836
192. A.P. Seyranian E. Lund N. Olhoff Multiple eigenvalues in structural optimization problems Struct. Optim. 8 1994 207-227
193. R.C.E. Tan A.L. Andrew F.M.L. Hong Iterative computation of second-order derivatives of eigenvalues and eigenvectors Commun. Numer. Methods Engrg. 10 1994 1-9
194. W.H. Wittrick Rates of change of eigenvalues with reference to buckling and vibration problems J. R Aeronautic. Soc. 66 1966 590-591
195. R.B. Nelson Simplified calculation of eigenvector derivatives AIAA J. 14 9 1976 1201-1205
196. I.U. Ojalvo Efficient computation of modal sensitivities for systems with repeated frequencies AIAA J. 26 3 1988 361-366
197. J.-G. Beliveau S. Cogan G. Lallement F. Ayer Iterative least-squares calculation for modal eigenvector sensitivity AIAA J. 34 2 1996 385-391
198. B. Lallemand P. Level H. Duveau B. Mahieux Eigensolutions sensitivity analysis using a sub-structuring method Comput. Struct. 71 1999 257-265
199. T. Ting Accelerated subspace iteration for eigenvector derivatives AIAA J. 30 8 1992 2114-2118
200. O. Zhang A. Zerva Accelerated iterative procedure for calculation eigenvector derivatives AIAA J. 35 2 1997 340-348
201. M.S. Zarghamee Optimum frequency of structures AIAA J. 6 4 1968 749-750
202. I. Grindeanu N.H. Kim K.K. Choi J.S. Chen Cad-based shape optimization using a meshfree method Concurrent Engrg.: Res. Appl. 10 1 2002 55-66
203. Y.H. Park K.K. Choi Configuration design sensitivity analysis of nonlinear structural systems with elastic material Mech. Struct. Mach. 24 2 1996 217-255
204. J.S. Park K.K. Choi Design sensitivity analysis of critical load factor for nonlinear structural systems Comput. Struct. 36 5 1990 823-838
205. K.K. Choi J.S. Park Optimal design of nonlinear structural systems with critical loads SAE Trans. 99 Sect6 1990 1141-1153
206. A. Eriksson Fold lines for sensitivity analyses in structural instability Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 114 1994 77-101
207. T.S. Kwon B.C. Lee W.J. Lee An approximation technique for design sensitivity analysis of the critical load in non-linear structures Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 45 1999 1727-1736
208. N. Olhoff S.H. Rasmussen On single and bimodal optimum buckling loads of clamped columns Int. J. Solid Struct. 13 1977 605-614
209. N.H. Kim K.K. Choi J.S. Chen Shape optimization of finite deformation elastoplasticity using continuum-based design sensitivity formulation Comput. Struct. 79 20-21 2001 1959-1976
210. F. Bobaru S. Mukherjee Shape sensitivity analysis and shape optimization in planar elasticity using the element-free galerkin method Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 190 32-33 2001 4319-4337
211. K.K. Choi N.H. Kim Design optimization of springback in a deepdrawing process AIAA J. 40 1 2002 147-153
212. N.H. Kim K.K. Choi J.S. Chen M.E. Botkin Meshfree analysis and design sensitivity analysis for shell structures Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 53 9 2002 2087-2116
213. N.H. Kim K.K. Choi M.E. Botkin Numerical method for shape optimization using meshfree method Struct. Optim. 24 6 2003 418-429
214. G. Bugeda L. Gil E. Onate Structural shape sensitivity analysis for nonlinear material models with strain softening Struct. Optim. 17 1999 162-171
215. C.A. Vidal R.B. Haber Design sensitivities for rate-independent elastoplasticity Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 107 1993 393-431
216. K.K. Choi, S. Cho, Design sensitivity analysis for structures using explicit time integration, in: 7th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, 2-4 September 1998, St Louis, MO.
217. M. Kleiber T.D. Hien Parameter sensitivity of inelastic buckling and post-buckling response Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 145 1997 239-262
218. H. Noguchi T. Hisada Sensitivity analysis in post-buckling problems of shell structures Comput. Struct. 47 4/5 1993 699-710
219. J.W. Hou C. Mei Y.X. Xue Design sensitivity analysis of beams under nonlinear forced vibrations AIAA J. 28 6 1990 1067-1068
220. M.M. Godse, E.J. Haug, K.K. Choi, A parametric design methodology for concurrent engineering, Technical report, Center for Computer-Aided Design, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA, 1991.
221. R.J. Yang, M.J. Fiedler, Design modeling for large-scale three-dimensional shape optimization problems, in: Proceedings of the 1987 ASME International Computers in Engineering Conference and Exhibition, New York, USA, 1987, pp. 177-182.
222. S. Kodiyalam V. Kumar P.M. Finnigan A constructive solid geometry approach to three-dimensional shape optimization AIAA J. 30 5 1992 1408-1415
223. M.E. Botkin Shape optimization of plate and shell structures AIAA J. 20 2 1982 268-273
224. C. Faure, C. Ducal, Shape optimal design- a performing cad oriented formulation, in: 25th AIAA SDM Conference, 1984, Palm Springs, CA, USA.
225. R.J. Yang M.E. Botkin A modular approach for three-dimensional shape optimization AIAA J. 25 3 1987 492-497
226. M.H. Imam Three-dimensional shape optimization Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 18 1982 661-673
227. K.K. Choi Shape design sensitivity analysis and optimal design of structural systems in: C.A.M. Soares (Ed.) Computed aided optimal design 1987 Springer-Verlag Heidelberg pp. 439-492
228. K.K. Choi, T.M. Yao, 3-d shape modeling and automatic regridding in shape design sensitivity analysis, in: Sensitivity Analysis in Engineering, NASA Conference Publication 2457, 1987, pp. 329-345.
229. T.M. Yao K.K. Choi 3-d shape optimal design and automatic finite element regridding Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 28 1989 369-384
230. H.-G. Seoung K.K. Choi Boundary-layer approach to shape design sensitivity analysis Mech. Struct. Mach. 15 2 1987 241-263
231. J.C. Robinson J.S. Campbell D. Kelliher Interior point tracking in shape evolving unstructured finite element meshes Engrg. Comput. 15 6 1998 721-731
232. S.D. Rajan A.D. Belegundu Shape optimal-design using fictitious loads AIAA J. 27 1 1989 102-107
233. A.D. Belegundu S.D. Rajan A shape optimization approach based on natural design variables and shape functions Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 66 1988 89-106
234. 2 continuity functions Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 188 2000 727-742
235. K.H. Chang K.K. Choi A geometry-based parameterization method for shape design of elastic solids Mech. Struct. Mach. 20 2 1992 215-252
236. K.K. Choi K.-H. Chang A study of design velocity field computation for shape optimal design Finite Element Anal. Des. 15 1994 317-341
237. P. Beckers Recent developments in shape sensitivity analysis: The physical approach Engrg. Optim. 18 1991 67-78
238. R.T. Haftka R.V. Grandhi Structural shape optimization - a survey Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 57 1986 91-106
239. Y. Ding Shape optimization of structures - a literature survey Comput. Struct. 24 6 1986 985-1004