Analytical response sensitivity computation using hybrid finite elements

Computers and Structures

Volumn 71, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 525-534

  Pandey, P C ^a   Bakshi, P ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; VARIATIONAL TECHNIQUES;

HYBRID FINITE ELEMENT; MODIFIED HELLINGER-REISSNER VARIATIONAL PRINCIPLE; RESPONSE SENSITIVITY;

FINITE ELEMENT METHOD;

EID: 0033148213     PISSN: 00457949     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0045-7949(98)00293-4     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Dems K., Mróz Z. Variational approach by means of adjoint systems to structural optimization and sensitivity analysis - I. Int J Solids Struct. 19:(8):1983;677-692.
2. Dems K., Mróz Z. Variational approach by means of adjoint systems to structural optimization and sensitivity analysis - II. Int J Solids Struct. 20:(6):1984;527-552.
3. Dems K., Mróz Z. Variational approach to first and second order sensitivity analysis of elastic structures. Int J Numer Meth Engng. 21:1985;637-661.
4. Choi K.K., Chang K.M. A study of design velocity field computation for shape optimal design. Finite Elem Anal Des. 15:1994;317-341.
5. Choi K.K., Santos J.L.T., Frederick M.C. Implementation of design sensitivity analysis with existing finite element codes. ASME J Mech Transm Autom Des. 109:1987;385-391.
6. Haftka R.T. Sensitivity calculations for iteratively solved problems. Int J Numer Meth Engng. 21:1985;1535-1546.
7. Haftka RT, Barthelemy B. On the accuracy of shape sensitivity. In: Brebbia CA, Hernandes S. editors. Computer aided optimum design of structures: recent advances. Springer Verlag, 1989. p. 327 - 36.
8. Arora J.S., Haug E.J. Methods of design sensitivity analysis in structural optimization. AIAA J. 17:(9):1979;970-974.
9. Belegundu A.D. Mu̇ller-Breslau's principle in adjoint design sensitivity analysis. Mech Struct Mach. 17:(3):1989;333-347.
10. Rajan S.D., Belegundu A.D. Shape optimization using fictitious loads. AIAA J. 27:(1):1989;102-107.
11. Wang S.Y., Sun Y., Gallagher R.H. Sensitivity analysis in shape optimization of continuum structures. Comput Struct. 20:(5):1985;855-867.
12. Gopalkrisnan H.S., Greimann L.F. Newton-Raphson procedure for the sensitivity analysis of non-linear structural behavior. Comput Struct. 30:(6):1988;1263-1273.
13. Tsay J.J., Arora J.S. Non-linear design sensitivity analysis for path dependent problems. Part I: general theory. Comput Meth Appl Mech Engng. 81:1990;183-208.
14. Tsay J.J., Arora J.S. Non-linear design sensitivity analysis for path dependent problems. Part II: analytical examples. Comput Meth Appl Mech Engng. 81:1990;209-228.
15. Tortorelli D.A. Sensitivity analysis for non-linear constrained elastostatic systems. Int J Numer Meth Engng. 33:1992;1643-1660.
16. Chen J.L., Ho J.S. Direct variational method for sizing design sensitivity analysis of beam and frame structures. Comput Struct. 42:(4):1992;503-509.
17. Stone T.A., Santos J.L.T., Haug E.J. An interactive pre-processor for structural design sensitivity and optimization. Comput Struct. 34:1990;375-385.
18. Santos J.L.T., Godse M.M., Chang K.H. An interactive post-processor for structural design sensitivity analysis and optimization: sensitivity display and what-if study. Comput Struct. 35:(1):1990;1-13.
19. Adelman H.M., Haftka R.T. Sensitivity analysis of discrete structural systems. AIAA J. 24:1986;823-832.
20. Haftka R.T., Adelman H.M. Recent developments in structural sensitivity analysis. Struct Opt. 1:1989;137-151.
21. Pandey P.C., Bakshi P. Structural response sensitivity computation - an evaluation. Parthan S., Sinha P.K. Computational Structural Mechanics. Proceedings of the National Seminar on Aero Structures - 94. 1994;3-12 Allied Publishers Ltd, New Delhi.
22. Pian T.H.H. Hybrid models. Fenves S.J., Robinson A.R., Perrone N., Schnobrich W.C. Numerical and computer methods in structural mechanics. 1973;59-78 Academic Press.
23. Pian T.H.H. Derivation of element stiffness matrices by assumed stress distributions. AIAA J. 2:(7):1964;1333-1336.
24. Zienkiewicz OC, Taylor RC The finite element method. Volume 1, 4th ed. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill, 1987.
25. Cheung Y.K., Chen W. Refined hybrid method for plane isoparametric element using an orthogonal approach. Comput Struct. 42:(5):1992;683-694.
26. Haug E.J., Choi K.K., Kromkov V. Design sensitivity analysis of structural systems. 1986;Academic Press, New York.
27. Chien W.Z. Method of high-order Lagrange multiplier and generalized variational principles of elasticity with more general forms of functionals. Applied Mathematical Mechanics. vol. 4:1983;137-150 Wuhan, China, EUST Press.
28. Chen W.J., Cheung Y.K. A new approach for the hybrid element method. Int J Numer Meth Engng. 24:1987;1697-1709.
29. Cheung Y.K., Chen W. Isoparametric hybrid hexahedral elements for three dimensional stress analysis. Int J Numer Meth Engng. 26:1988;677-693.
30. Cheung Y.K., Chen W. Hybrid element method for incompressible and nearly incompressible materials. Int J Solids Struct. 25:(5):1989;483-495.
31. Chen W.J., Cheung Y.K. A robust refined quadrilateral plane element. Int J Numer Meth Engng. 38:1995;649-666.
32. Gray J. Mastering MATHEMATICA: programming methods and applications. 1994.
33. Pian T.H.H., Sumihara K. Rational approach for assumed stress finite elements. Int J Numer Meth Engng. 20:1984;1685-1695.
34. Pian T.H.H., Tong P. Relations between incompatible displacement model and hybrid stress model. Int J Numer Meth Engng. 22:1984;173-181.