Temperature-dependent x-ray absorption spectroscopy of colossal magnetoresistive perovskites

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 71, Issue 12, 2005, Pages

  Mannella, N ^a,b,f   Rosenhahn, A ^b,g   Watanabe, M ^b,c   Sell, B ^a,b   Nambu, A ^b,d,h   Ritchey, S ^a,b   Arenholz, E ^b   Young, A ^b   Tomioka, Y ^e   Fadley, C S ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^c RIKEN   (Japan)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^e Correlated Electron Research Center ^*  (Japan)

^f STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^h HIGH ENERGY ACCELERATOR RESEARCH ORGANIZATION KEK   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LANTHANUM; MANGANESE DERIVATIVE; PEROVSKITE;

ABSORPTION SPECTROPHOTOMETRY; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; MAGNETIC FIELD; ROENTGEN SPECTROSCOPY; TEMPERATURE DEPENDENCE;

EID: 20044388417     PISSN: 10980121     EISSN: 1550235X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.125117     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. See, for example, Colossal Magnetoresistive Oxides, edited by Y. Tokura (Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, New York, 2000).
2. J. M. D. Coey, M. Viret, and S. von Molnar, Adv. Phys. 48, 167 (1999).
3. A. P. Ramirez, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 9, 8171 (1999).
4. M. B. Salamon and M. Jaime, Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 583 (2001).
5. C. Zener, Phys. Rev. 82, 403 (1951).
6. A. J. Millis, P. B. Littlewood, and B. I. Shraiman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 5144 (1995).
7. A. J. Millis, B. I. Shraiman, and R. Mueller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 175 (1996).
8. T. A. Tyson, J. Mustre de Leon, S. D. Conradson, A. R. Bishop, J. J. Neumeier, H. Röder, and Jun Zang, Phys. Rev. B 53, 13 985 (1996).
9. S. J. L. Billinge, R. G. DiFrancesco, G. H. Kwei, J. J. Neumeier, and J. D. Thompson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 715 (1996).
10. J. M. De Teresa, M. R. Ibarra, P. A. Algarabel, C. Ritter, C. Marquina, J. Blasco, J. Garcia, A. del Moral, and Z. Arnold, Nature (London) 386, 256 (1997).
11. C. H. Booth, F. Bridges, G. H. Kwei, J. M. Lawrence, A. L. Cornelius, and J. J. Neumeier, Phys. Rev. B 57, 10 440 (1998).
12. D. Louca and T. Egami, Phys. Rev. B 59, 6193 (1999).
13. M. Abbate, F. M. F. de Groot, J. C. Fuggle, A. Fujimori, O. Strebel, F. Lopez, M. Domke, G. Kaindl, G. A. Sawatzky, M. Takano, Y. Takeda, H. Eisaki, and S. Uchida, Phys. Rev. B 46, 4511 (1992).
14. M. Abbate, G. Zampieri, F. Prado, A. Caneiro, and A. R. B. de Castro, Solid State Commun. 111, 437 (1999).
15. T. Saitoh, A. E. Bocquet, T. Mizokawa, H. Namatame, A. Fujimori, M. Abbate, Y. Takeda, and M. Takano, Phys. Rev. B 51, 13 942 (1995).
16. E. Pellegrin, L. H. Tjeng, F. M. F. de Groot, R. Hesper, G. A. Sawatzky, Y. Moritomo, and Y. Tokura, J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 86, 115 (1997).
17. J.-H. Park, T. Kimura, and Y. Tokura, Phys. Rev. B 58, R13 330 (1998).
18. D. S. Dessau, Y. D. Chuang, A. Gromko, T. Saitoh, T. Kimura, and Y. Tokura, J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 117-118, 265 (2001).
19. O. Toulemonde, F. Millange, F. Studer, B. Raveau, J.-H. Park, and C.-T. Chen, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 11, 109 (1999).
20. N. Mannella, A. Rosenhahn, C. H. Booth, S. Marchesini, B. S. Mun, S.-H. Yang, K. Ibrahim, Y. Tomioka, and C. S. Fadley, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 166401 (2004).
21. T. Shibata, B. A. Bunker, and J. F. Mitchell, Phys. Rev. B 68, 024103 (2003).
22. A. Urushibara, Y. Moritomo, T. Arima, A. Asamitsu, G. Kido, and Y. Tokura, Phys. Rev. B 51, 14 103 (1995).
23. P. Schiffer, A. P. Ramirez, W. Bao, and S.-W. Cheong, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3336 (1995).
24. A. W. Kay, F. J. Garcia de Abajo, S.-H. Yang, E. Arenholz, B. S. Mun, N. Mannella, Z. Hussain, M. A. Van Hove, and C. S. Fadley, Phys. Rev. B 63, 115119 (2001);
25. N. Mannella, S. Marchesini, A. W. Kay, A. Nambu, T. Gresch, S.-H. Yang, B. S. Mun, J. M. Bussat, A. Rosenhahn, and C. S. Fadley, J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 141, 45 (2004).
26. H. Kurata and C. Colliex, Phys. Rev. B 48, 2102 (1993).
27. The different magnitude of the JTDs for LSMO and LCMO would qualitatively correspond to the cases respectively illustrated in Fig. 8b and Fig. 8c of Ref. 19.