Comparison of changes in fruit gene expression in tomato introgression lines provides evidence of genome-wide transcriptional changes and reveals links to mapped QTLs and described traits

Journal of Experimental Botany

Volumn 56, Issue 416, 2005, Pages 1591-1604

  Baxter, Charles J ^a   Sabar, Mohammed ^a,c   Quick, W Paul ^b   Sweetlove, Lee J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Brix; Carbohydrate metabolism; Introgression; Tomato microarray; Yield

Indexed keywords

CARBOHYDRATES; CARBON; ENZYMES; GENES; MAPPING; METABOLISM; REFRACTIVE INDEX; SOLUBILITY; SUGAR (SUCROSE); THROUGHPUT;

FRUIT QUALITY; METABOLIC GENES; SIGNIFICANCE ANALYSIS OF MICROARRAYS (SAM); TOTAL SOLUBLE SOLIDS;

FRUITS;

ARTICLE; CARBOHYDRATE METABOLISM; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FRUIT; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; GENETICS; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; TOMATO;

CARBOHYDRATE METABOLISM; FRUIT; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, PLANT; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI; TRANSCRIPTION, GENETIC;

CARBOHYDRATES; CARBON; FRUITS; GENES; REFRACTIVITY; SOLUBILITY;

LYCOPERSICON; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM;

EID: 20044386129     PISSN: 00220957     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/eri154     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Alba R, Fei Z, Paxton P, et al. 2004. ESTs, cDNA microarrays, and gene expression profiling: tools for dissecting plant physiology and development. The Plant Journal 39, 697-714.
2. Baxter CJ, Foyer CH, Turner J, Rolfe SA, Quick WP. 2003. Elevated sucrose-phosphate synthase activity in transgenic tobacco sustains photosynthesis in older leaves and alters development. Journal of Experimental Botany 54, 1813-1820.
3. Baxter CB, Carrari F, Bauke A, Overy S, Hill SA, Quick P, Fernie A, Sweetlove LJ. 2005. Fruit carbohydrate metabolism in an introgression line of tomato with increased fruit soluble solids. Plant Cell Physiology (in press).
4. Causse M, Duffe P, Gomez MC, Buret M, Damidaux R, Zamir D, Gur A, Chevalier C, Lemaire-Chamley M, Rothan C. 2004. A genetic map of candidate genes and QTLs involved in tomato fruit size and composition. Journal of Experimental Botany 55, 1671-1685.
5. Chang S, Puryear J, Cairney J. 1993. A simple and efficient method for isolating RNA from pine trees. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter 11, 113-116.
6. Eshed Y, Abu-Abied M, Saranga Y, Zamir D. 1992. Lycopersicum esculentum lines containing small overlapping introgressions from L. pennellii. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 83, 1027-1034.
7. Eshed Y, Gera G, Zamir D. 1996. A genome-wide search for wild-species alleles that increase horticultural yield of processing tomato. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 93, 877-886.
8. Eshed Y, Zamir D. 1995. An introgression line population of Lycopersicon pennellii in the cultivated tomato enables the identification and fine mapping of yield-associated QTL. Genetics 141, 1147-1162.
9. Fei Z, Tang X, Alba RM, White JA, Ronning CM, Martin GB, Tanksley SD, Giovannoni JJ. 2004. Comprehensive EST analysis of tomato and comparative genomics of fruit ripening. The Plant Journal 40, 47-59.
10. Fuglevand G, Phillips W, Mozzanega P, Corley S, Chengappa S, Shields R. 1998. Mapping of tomato genes associated with sugar metabolism. Tomato Genetics Co-operative Report 48, 22-23.
11. Fridman E, Pleban T, Zamir D. 2000. A recombination hotspot delimits a wild-species quantitative trait locus for tomato sugar content to 484 bp within an invertase gene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 97, 4718-4723.
12. Fridman E, Carrari F, Liu YS, Fernie AR, Zamir D. 2004. Zooming in on a quantitative trait for tomato yield using interspecific introgressions. Science 305, 1786-1789.
13. Grierson D, Kader AA. 1986. Fruit ripening and quality. In: Atherton JG, Rudich J, eds. The tomato crop. A scientific basis for improvement. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 241-280.
14. Gur A, Semel Y, Cahaner A, Zamir D. 2004. Real time QTL of complex phenotypes in tomato interspecific introgression lines. Trends in Plant Science 9, 107-109.
15. Liu YS, Gur A, Ronen G, Causse M, Damidaux R, Buret M, Hirschberg J, Zamir D. 2003. There is more to fruit colour than candidate carotenoid genes. Plant Biotechnology Journal 1, 195-207.
16. Miron D, Schaffer AA. 1991. Sucrose phosphate synthase, sucrose synthase, and invertase activities in developing fruit of Lycopersicon esculentum Mill, and the sucrose accumulating Lycopersicon hirsutum Humb and Bonpl. Plant Physiology 95, 623-627.
17. Monforte AJ, Fridman E, Zamir D, Tanksley SD. 2001. Comparison of a set of allelic QTL-NILs for chromosome 4 of tomato: Deductions about natural variation and implications for germplasm utilization. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 102, 572-590.
18. N'tchobo H, Dali N, Nguyen-Quoc B, Foyer CH, Yelle S. 1999. Starch synthesis in tomato remains constant throughout fruit development and is dependent on sucrose supply and sucrose synthase activity. Journal of Experimental Botany 50, 1457-1463.
19. Overy SA, Walker HJ, Malone S, Howard TP, Baxter CJ, Sweetlove LJ, Hill SA, Quick WP. 2005. Application of metabolite profiling to the identification of traits in a population of tomato introgression lines. Journal of Experimental Botany 56, 287-296.
20. Price J, Laxmi A, St Martin SK, Jang JC. 2004. Global transcription profiling reveals multiple sugar signal transduction mechanisms in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 16, 2128-2150.
21. Robinson NL, Hewitt JD, Bennett AB. 1988. Sink metabolism in tomato fruit. 1. Developmental changes in carbohydrate metabolizing enzymes. Plant Physiology 87, 727-730.
22. Roessner-Tunali U, Hegemann B, Lytovchenko A, Carrari F, Bruedigam C, Granot D, Fernie A. 2003. Metabolic profiling of transgenic tomato plants overexpressing hexokinase reveals that the influence of hexose phosphorylation diminishes during fruit development. Plant Physiology 133, 84-99.
23. Ruuska SA, Girke T, Benning C, Ohlrogge JB. 2002. Contrapuntal networks of gene expression during Arabidopsis seed filling. The Plant Cell 14, 1191-1206.
24. Schaffer AA, Levin I, Oguz I, Petreikov M, Cincarevsky F, Yeselson Y, Shen S, Gilboa N, Bar M. 2000. ADPGlucose pyrophosphorylase activity and starch accumulation in immature tomato fruit: the effect of a Lycopersicum hirsutum-denved introgression encoding for the large subunit. Plant Science 152, 135-144.
25. Schaffer AA, Petreikov M. 1997. Sucrose-to-starch metabolism in tomato fruit undergoing transient starch accumulation. Plant Physiology 113, 739-746.
26. Sreenivasulu N, Altschmied L, Radchuk V, Gubatz S, Wobus U, Weschke W. 2004. Transcript profiles and deduced changes of metabolic pathways in maternal and filial tissues of developing barley grains. The Plant Journal 37, 539-553.
27. Stommel JR. 1992. Enzymic components of sucrose accumulation in the wild tomato species Lycopersicum peruvianum. Plant Physiology 99, 324-328.
28. Sun J, Loboda T, Sung SJS, Black CC. 1992. Sucrose synthase in wild tomato, Lycopersicon chmielewskii, and tomato fruit sink strength. Plant Physiology 98, 1163-1169.
29. Sweetlove LJ, Burrell MM, ap Rees T. 1996. Starch metabolism in tubers of transgenic potato (Solanum tuberosum) with increased ADPglucose pyrophosphorylase. Biochemical Journal 320, 493-498.
30. Tanksley SD, Ganal MW, Prince JP, et al. 1992. High-density molecular-linkage maps of the tomato and potato genomes. Genetics 132, 1141-1160.
31. Thimm O, Biasing O, Gibon Y, Nagel A, Meyer S, Kruger P, Selbig J, Muller LA, Rhee SY, Stitt M. 2004. MAPMAN: a user-driven tool to display genomics data sets onto diagrams of metabolic pathways and other biological processes. The Plant Journal 37, 914-939.
32. Tusher VG, Tibshirani R, Chu G. 2001. Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 98, 5116-5121.
33. Van der Hoeven R, Ronning C, Giovannoni J, Martin G, Tanksley SD. 2002. Deductions about the number, organization and evolution of genes in the tomato genome based on analysis of a large expressed sequence tag collection and selective genome sequencing. The Plant Cell 14, 1441-1456.
34. Yelle S, Chetelat RT, Dorias M, DeVerna JW, Bennett AB. 1991. Sink metabolism in tomato fruit. 4. Genetic and biochemical analysis of sucrose accumulation. Plant Physiology 95, 1026-1035.
35. Yelle S, Hewitt JD, Robinson NL, Damon S, Bennett AB. 1988. Sink metabolism in tomato fruit. 3. Analysis of carbohydrate assimilation in a wild species. Plant Physiology 87, 737-740.