Differences in oscillometric non-invasive blood pressure measurements recorded by different revisions of the Philips Component Monitoring System

Blood Pressure Monitoring

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 215-222

  Murray, Ian C ^a,b   Amoore, John N ^a   Scott, David H T ^a  

^a ROYAL INFIRMARY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b School of Clinical Sciences and Community Health   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Different algorithms; Noninvasive blood pressure measurement; Simulators

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; AUSCULTATION; BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DIASTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; HUMAN; MEAN ARTERIAL PRESSURE; OSCILLOMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE;

ALGORITHMS; AUSCULTATION; BLOOD PRESSURE; BLOOD PRESSURE DETERMINATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMANS; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; PERIODICITY; SOFTWARE;

EID: 20044380065     PISSN: 13595237     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.mbp.0000168399.64296.0f     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Ng K-G, Small CF. Survey of automated non-invasive blood pressure monitors. J Clini Eng 1994; 19:452-475.
2. Sapinski A. Standard algorithm of blood-pressure measurement by the oscillometric method (letter). Med Biol Eng Comput 1992; 30:671.
3. Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation. American National Standard. Electronic or Automated Sphygmomanometers. ANSI/ AAMI SP 10-1992. 4. Arlington, Virginia: AAMI, 1993: 40. Comment: SP10-1992
4. O'Brien E, Petrie J, Littler R, De Sweit M, Padfield PL, Altman D, et al. The British Hypertension Society protocol for the evaluation of blood pressure measuring devices. J Hypertens 1993; 11(Suppl 2):S43-S63.
5. Ng K-G, Small CF. Update on methods & simulators for evaluation of noninvasive blood pressure monitors. J Clin Eng 1994; 19:125-134 [published errata appear in 19:348 (letter) and 21:226-244].
6. Mieke S. Substitution of simulators for human subjects. Blood Press Monit 1997; 2:252-258.
7. Ng K-G. Considerations for simulation-based evaluation of noninvasive blood pressure monitors. Blood Press Monit 1997; 2:257-268 [published erratum appears in 3:137].
8. Amoore JN. A simulation study of the consistency of oscillometric blood pressure measurements with and without artefacts. Blood Press Monit 2000; 5:69-79.
9. Amoore JN, Scott DHT. Can simulators evaluate systematic differences between oscillometric NIBP monitors? Blood Press Monit 2000; 5:81-89.
10. Philips Medical Systems. Non Invasive Blood Pressure Measurement - Application Note. M1008B CMS and V24/26 Release C.1 and M3/M4 Release D. Philips Medizinsysteme Böblingen GmbH, Cardiac and Monitoring Systems. Böblingen, Germany: Hewlett-Packard; published 02/ 2002.
11. Geake WB, Amoore JN, Scott DHT. An automated system for the functional evaluation of oscillometric non-invasive blood pressure monitors. J Med Eng Technol 1995; 19:162-176.
12. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement, Lancet, 1986; 8: 307-310.
13. O'Brien E, Waeber B, Parati G, Staessen J, Myers MG. Blood pressure measuring devices: recommendations of the European Society of Hypertension. Br Med J 2001; 322:531-536.
14. Gerin W, Schwartz AR, Schwarte JE, Pickering TG, Davidson KW, Bress J, et al. Limitations of current validation protocols for home blood pressure monitors for individual patients. Blood Press Monit 2002; 7:313-318.
15. Montfrans GA. Oscillometric blood pressure measurement: progress and problems. Blood Press Monit 2001; 6:287-290.
16. Cockings JGL, Webb RK, Klepper ID, Currie M, Morgan C. Blood pressure monitoring - applications and limitations: an analysis of 2000 incident reports. Anaesth Intensive Care 1993; 21: 565-569.