Scattering near-field optical microscopy of optically anisotropic systems

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 71, Issue 11, 2005, Pages

  Schneider, S C ^a   Grafstrom S ^a   Eng, L M ^a  

^a DRESDEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BARIUM DERIVATIVE; BARIUM TITANATE; TITANIUM DERIVATIVE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANISOTROPY; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL INTERACTION; CHEMICAL MODIFICATION; ELECTRICITY; ILLUMINATION; OPTICAL RESOLUTION; POLARIZATION; SCANNING NEAR FIELD OPTICAL MICROSCOPY;

EID: 20044379104     PISSN: 10980121     EISSN: 1550235X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.115418     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. E. H. Synge, Philos. Mag. 6, 356 (1928).
2. D. W. Pohl, W. Denk, and M. Lanz, Appl. Phys. Lett. 44, 651 (1984).
3. E. Abbe, Archiv für mikroskopische Anatomie IX, 413 (1873).
4. E. Abbe, Journal of the Royal Microscopical Society (2nd series), Vol. 2 (1882), pp. 300-309 and pp. 460-473;
5. E. Abbe, Journal of the Royal Microscopical Society (2nd series), Vol. 3 (1883), pp. 790-812.
6. F. Zenhausern, M. P. O'Boyle, and H. K. Wickramasinghe, Appl. Phys. Lett. 65, 1623 (1994).
7. Y. Inouye and S. Kawata, Opt. Lett. 19, 159 (1994).
8. R. Bachelot, P. Gleyzes, and A. C. Boccara, Microsc. Microanal. Microstruct. 5, 389 (1994).
9. M. Specht, J. D. Pedarnig, W. M. Heckl, and T. W. Hänsch, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 476 (1992).
10. B. Knoll and F. Keilmann, Opt. Commun. 182, 321 (2000).
11. J. D. Jackson, Klassische Elektrodynamik, 2.Auflage (Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 1983).
12. I. V. Lindell, K. I. Nikoskinen, and M. J. Flykt, Radio Sci. 31, 1361 (1996).
13. I. V. Lindell, K. I. Nikoskinen, and A. Viljanen, IEE Proc.: Sci., Meas. Technol. 144, 156 (1997).
14. C. F. Bohren and D. R. Huffman, Absorption and Scattering of Light by Small Particles (Wiley, New York, 1998).
15. G. Szivessy, in Handbuch der Physik, edited by H. Geiger and K. Scheel (Springer, Berlin, 1928), Vol. 20.
16. A. Madrazo, R. Carminati, M. Nieto-Vesperinas, and J.-J. Greffet, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 15, 109 (1998).
17. Landolt-Börnstein Numerical Data and Functional Relationships in Science and Technology, edited by K.-H. Hellwege, Group III: Crystal and Solid State Physics, Vol. 17 Semiconductors, edited by O. Madelung, M. Schulz, and H. Weiss (Springer, 1982).
18. At small tip-sample separations, the probe dipole is effectively displaced from the center of the probe toward the sample, as shown by a numerical analysis (Ref. 19). Therefore, when we assume that the distance between the surface and the scatterer equals the radius of the latter, this only nominally corresponds to a situation in which the probe touches the surface. In reality, there would still be some space between the two bodies when the probe dipole is at the position specified by h=r.
19. D. R. Lide, CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1992).
20. J. Renger, S. Grafström, L. M. Eng, and R. Hillenbrand, Phys. Rev. B 71, 075410 (2005).
21. M. Zgonik, P. Bernasconi, M. Duelli, R. Schlesser, P. Günter, M. H. Garrett, D. Rytz, Y. Zhu, and X. Wu, Phys. Rev. B 50, 5941 (1994).
22. M. Abplanalp, L. M. Eng, and P. Günter, Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process. 66, 231 (1998).
23. S. Hong, J. Woo, H. Shin, J. U. Jeon, Y. E. Pak, E. L. Colla, N. Setter, E. Kim, and K. No, J. Appl. Phys. 89, 1377 (2001).