Computational-fluid-dynamics-based aeroelastic analysis and structural design optimization - A researcher's perspective

Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering

Volumn 194, Issue 30-33 SPEC. ISS., 2005, Pages 3453-3471

  Raveh, Daniella E ^a  

^a TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; ELASTICITY; FLUTTER (AERODYNAMICS); INTERFACES (MATERIALS); LOADS (FORCES); OPTIMIZATION;

AIRCRAFT STRUCTURAL DESIGN; FLUID-STRUCTURE INTERFACES; FLUTTER ANALYSIS; LOAD ANALYSIS;

STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS;

AEROELASTICITY; AIRCRAFT; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; FLUID-STRUCTURE INTERACTION; FLUTTER;

EID: 20044374732     PISSN: 00457825     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2004.12.027     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. J. Dungundji Personal perspective of aeroelasticity during the years 1953-1993 J. Aircraft 40 5 2003
2. R. Yurkovich, D.D. Liu, P.C. Chen, The state-of-the-art of unsteady aerodynamics for high performance aircraft, in: CEAS International Forum on Aeroelasticity and Structural Dynamics, Madrid, Spain, 1 June 2001, pp. 47-68.
3. R.M. Bennett, J.W. Edwards, An overview of recent developments in computational aeroelasticity, in: 29th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference, June 1998. AIAA-98-2421.
4. M. Hacklinger, The development of manoeuvre load criteria for agile aircraft, AGARD Workshop on Design Loads for Advanced Fighters, February 1988, AGARD Report No. 746.
5. G.J. Watson, Eurofighter 2000 structural design criteria and design loading assumptions, in: 83rd Meeting of the AGARD Structures and Materials Panel, Florence, Italy, September 1996, AGARD Report 815.
6. D.H. Gibson, Evolution of F-16 loads and requirements, in: 83rd Meeting of the AGARD Structures and Materials Panel, Florence, Italy, September 1996. AGARD Report 815.
7. M. Love, T. De La Garza, E. Charlton, D. Eagle, Computational aeroelasticity in high performance aircraft flight loads, in: 22nd International Congress of Aeronautical Sciences, UK, 2000, ICAS Paper 2000-4.8.1.
8. G. Kingsley, J.M. Siegel Jr., V.J. Harrans, C. Lawrence, J.J. Luker, Development of a multi-disciplinary computing environment (MDICE), in: 7th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, St. Louis, MO, September 1998, AIAA-98-4738.
9. R. Heinrich, R. Ahrem, G. Gunther, H.-P. Kersken, W. Kruger, J. Neumann, Aeroelastic computation using the AMANDA simulation environment, in: Conference on Multidisciplinary Aircraft Design and Optimization, CEAS, Germany 2001.
10. M. Stettner, W. Haase, A. Eberle, J. Grashof, M. Schneider, Coupled static and dynamic aeroelastic simulations in transonic and supersonic flow, in: 22nd International Congress of Aeronautical Sciences, UK, 2000, ICAS Paper 2000-4.8.2.
11. H. Fornasier, H. Rieger, U. Tremel, E. Van der Veide, Time-dependent aeroelastic simulation of rapid manoeuvring aircraft, in: 40th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, January 2002, AIAA 2002-0949.
12. W. Whitlow Jr., R.M. Bennett, Application of a transonic potential flow code to the static aeroelastic analysis of three-dimensional wings, in: Proceedings of the 23rd Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, vol. 2, AIAA, Washington, pp. 267-276
13. N. Agrell, S.G. Hedman, Calculations of transonic steady state aeroelastic effects for canard airplane, in: Proceedings of the 13th Congress of the International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences, AIAA Aircraft System and Technology Conference, AIAA,Washington, DC, pp. 59-66
14. J.L. Pittman, G.L. Giles, Combined nonlinear aerodynamic and structural method for the aeroelastic design of a three-dimensional wing in supersonic flow, in: Proceedings of the Applied Aerodynamics Conference, AIAA, Washington, DC, pp. 36-44
15. K.E. Tatum G.L. Giles Integrating nonlinear aerodynamic and structural analysis for a complete fighter configuration J. Aircraft 25 12 1988 1150-1156 also AIAA Paper 87-2863, 1987.
16. L. Vinh, J.W. Edwards, D.A. Seidel, J.T. Batina, Transonic stability and control of aircraft using CFD methods, in: Proceedings of the AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference, AIAA, Washington, DC, 1988, pp. 394-404.
17. D.M. Schuster J. Vadyak E. Atta Static aeroelastic analysis of fighter aircraft using a three-dimensional Navier-Stokes algorithm J. Aircraft 27 9 1990 820-825
18. D.M. Schuster Application of a Navier-Stokes aeroelastic method to improve fighter wing performance at Maneuver flight conditions J. Aircraft 32 1 1995 77-83
19. G.P. Guruswamy Coupled finite-difference/finite-element approach for wing-body aeroelasticity Proceedings of the 4th Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization 1992 AIAA Washington, DC pp. 1-12
20. S. Obayashi G.P. Guruswamy Convergence acceleration of Navier-Stokes solver for efficient static aeroelastic computations AIAA J. 33 6 1996 1134-1141
21. D.E. Raveh M. Karpel S. Yaniv Nonlinear design loads for maneuvering elastic aircraft J. Aircraft 37 2 2000 313-318
22. D.E. Raveh M. Karpel Structural optimization of flight vehicles with computational-fluid-dynamics-based Maneuver loads J. Aircraft 36 6 1999 1007-1015
23. S. Yaniv Navier-Stokes calculations for rotating configurations: implementation for rockets J. Spacecraft 33 5 1996
24. Y. Levy Numerical simulation of dynamically deforming aircraft configurations using overset grids J. Aircraft 38 2 2001 349-354
25. M.J. Smith, D.H. Hodges, C.E.S. Cesnik, An evaluation of computational algorithms to interface between CFD and CSD methodologies, Air Force Wright Aeronautical Laboratories, WL-TR-96-3055, November 1995.
26. R.L. Harder R.N. Desmarais Interpolation using surface splines J. Aircraft 9 2 1972 189-191
27. W.P. Rodden E.H. Johnson MSC/NASTRAN Aeroelastic Analysis User's Guide 1994 Macneal-schwendler Corp CA
28. D.E. Raveh Y. Levy M. Karpel Structural optimization using computational aerodynamics AIAA J. 38 10 2000 1974-1982
29. R. Melville, Nonlinear mechanisms of aeroelastic instability for the F-16, in: 40th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, January 2002, Reno, NV, AIAA-2002-0871.
30. R. Melville, Aeroelastic instability of tactical aircraft in nonlinear flow regimes, in: 32nd AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference, June 2002, St. Louis, MO, AIAA-2002-2970.
31. G.P. Guruswamy Unsteady aerodynamic and aeroelastic calculations for wings using euler equations AIAA J. 28 3 1990 461-469
32. M.K. Bhardwaj R.K. Kapania E. Reichenbach G.P. Guruswamy Computational fluid dynamics/computational structural dynamics interaction methodology for aircraft wings AIAA J. 36 12 1998 2179-2186
33. C. Byun G.P. Guruswamy Aeroelastic computation on wing-body-control configurations on parallel computers J. Aircraft 35 2 1998 288-294
34. J.T. Batina Unsteady euler airfoil solutions using unstructured dynamic meshes AIAA J. 28 8 1990 1381-1388
35. B.A. Robinson J.T. Batina H.T.Y. Yang Aeroelastic analysis of wings using the euler equations with a deforming mesh J. Aircraft 28 11 1991 778-788
36. W.T. Jones, J. Samareh-Abolhassani, A grid generation system for multi-disciplinary design optimization, in: 12th AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, Washington DC, 1995, pp. 474-482
37. M.A. Potsdam, G.P. Guruswamy, A parallel multiblock mesh movement scheme for complex aeroelastic applications, in: Proceedings of the 39th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, January 2001, Reno, NV, AIAA 2001-0716.
38. P.C. Chen, L.R. Hill, A three-dimensional boundary element method for CFD/CSD grid interfacing, in: 40th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference and Exhibit, St. Louis, MO, 1999, AIAA-99-1213, pp. 88-98
39. P.C. Chen I. Jadic Interfacing of fluid and structural models via innovative structural boundary element method AIAA J. 36 2 1998 282-287
40. C. Farhat, C. Degand, B. Koobus, M. Lesoinne, Improved method of spring analogy for dynamic unstructured fluid meshes, in: 39th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/ AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Long Beach, CA, April 1998, AIAA-98-2070.
41. K.L. Lai, H.M. Tsai, K.Y. Lum, A CFD and CSD interaction algorithm for large and complex configurations, in: 20th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, June 2002, St. Louis, MO, AIAA-2002-2715.
42. X. Gao P.C. Chen L. Tang Deforming mesh for computational aeroelasticity using a nonlinear elastic boundary element method AIAA J. 40 8 2002 August
43. R. Yurkovich Status of unsteady aerodynamic prediction for flutter of high-performance aircraft J. Aircraft 40 5 2003
44. P. Guruswamy, T.Y. Yang, Aeroelastic time response analysis of thin airfoils by transonic code LTRAN2, in: Computers and Fluids, vol. 9 (4), Pergamon Press Ltd., 1981, pp. 409-425
45. C. Farhat M. Lesoinne N. Maman Mixed explicit/implicit time integration of coupled aeroelastic problems: Three-field formulation, geometric conservation and distributed solution Int. J. Num Methods Fluids 21 1995 807-835
46. M. Lesoinne C. Farhat Geometric conservation laws for flow problems with moving boundaries and deformable meshes and their impact on aeroelastic computations Comput Methods Appl Mech Engrg. 134 1996 71-90
47. B. Koobus C. Farhat Second-order time-accurate and geometrically conservative implicit schemes for flow computations on unstructured dynamics meshes Comput. Methods Appl Mech Engrg. 170 1999 103-130
48. P. Geuzaine G. Brown C. Harris C. Farhat Aeroelastic dynamic analysis of a full F-16 configuration for various flight conditions AIAA J. 41 3 2003
49. M. Lesoinne C. Farhat Higher-order subiteration-free staggered algorithm for nonlinear transient aeroelastic problems AIAA J. 36 9 1998 1754-1756
50. E.H. Dowell, Eigen-mode analysis in unsteady aerodynamics: Reduced-order models, in: AIAA 36th Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, 1995, pp. 2545-2557
51. W. Silva, P. Beran, C. Cesnik, R. Guendel, A. Kurdila, R. Prazenica, L. Librescu, P. Marzocca, D. Raveh, Reduced-order modeling: Cooperative research and development at the NASA Langley Research Center, in: CEAS International Forum on Aeroelasticity and Structural Dynamics, Madrid, Spain, June 2001, vol. 2, pp. 159-174
52. P. Beran, W.A. Silva, Reduced-order modeling-new approaches for computational physics, in: 39th AIAA, Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, January 2001, AIAA-2001-0853.
53. W.J. Rugh Nonlinear System Theory the Volterra/Wiener Approach 1981 The John Hopkins University Press Baltimore and London
54. W.A. Silva, Reduced-order models based on linear and nonlinear aerodynamic impulse responses, in: International Forum on Aeroelasticity and Structural Dynamics, Williamsburg, VA, June 1999, NASA, Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA.
55. W.A. Silva Application of nonlinear systems theory to transonic unsteady aerodynamic responses J. Aircraft 30 5 1993 660-668
56. W.A. Silva, Extension of a nonlinear system theory to general-frequency unsteady transonic aerodynamic responses, in: 34th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, La Jolla, CA, April 1993, AIAA-93-1590.
57. W.A. Silva, Identification of linear and nonlinear impulse response using digital filter techniques, in: 35th AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference, New Orleans, LA, August 1997, AIAA-97-3712.
58. W.A. Silva, Discrete-time linear and nonlinear aerodynamic impulse responses for efficient CFD analyses, PhD Thesis, The College of William and Mary in Virginia, The Faculty of the Department of Applied Mechanics, October 1997.
59. D.E. Raveh Y. Levy M. Karpel Efficient aeroelastic analysis using computational unsteady aerodynamics J. Aircraft 38 3 2001 547-556
60. E.C. Yates Jr., AGARD Standard Aeroelastic Configurations for Dynamic Response, Candidate Configuration I.-Wing 445.6, NASA TM-100492, 1987.
61. ZAERO Theoretical Manual, Version 6.0, Zona Technology, Inc., Scottsdale, AZ, May 2002.
62. D.E. Raveh Reduced-order models for nonlinear unsteady aerodynamics AIAA J. 39 8 2001
63. P.H. Reisenthel, M.T. Bettencourt, Extraction of nonlinear indicial and critical state responses from experimental data, in: 37th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, January 1999, AIAA-99-0764.
64. P.H. Reisenthel, Prediction of unsteady aerodynamic forces via nonlinear kernel identification, in: International Forum on Aeroelasticity and Structural Dynamics, Williamsburg, VA, June 1999, NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA.
65. A. Kurdila, O. Rediniotis, T. Stragnac, Multiresolution methods for reduced order models for dynamical systems, in: 40th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, St. Louis, MO, April 1999, AIAA-99-1263.
66. R. Prazenica, A. Kurdila, W.A. Silva, Multiresolution methods for representation of volterra series and dynamical systems, in: 41st AIAA/ ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Atlanta, GA, April 2000, AIAA-2000-1754.
67. W.F. Ballhaus P.M. Goorjian Computation of unsteady transonic flows by indicial methods AIAA J. 16 2 1978 117-124
68. E.M. Lee-Rausch J.T. Batina Wing flutter boundary prediction using unsteady Euler aerodynamic method J. Aircraft 32 2 1995 416-422
69. K.L. Roger Airplane math modeling methods for active control design AGARD CP 228 1977 August
70. M. Karpel Time-domain aeroservoelastic modeling using weighted unsteady aerodynamic forces J. Guidance Contr. Dyn. 13 1 1990 30-37
71. T.J. Cowan A.S. Arena Jr. K.K. Gupta Accelerating computational fluid dynamics based aeroelastic predictions using system identification J. Aircraft 38 1 2001 81-87
72. T.J. Cowan, A.S. Arena Jr., K.K. Gupta, Development of a discrete-time aerodynamic model for CFD-based aeroelastic analysis, in: AIAA, 37th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, January 1999, AIAA-99-0765.
73. P.G. Hamel R.V. Jategaonkar Evolution of flight vehicle system identification J. Aircraft 33 1 1996 January-February
74. W. Silva, R. Bartels, Development of reduced-order models for aeroelastic analysis and flutter prediction using the CFL3Dv6.0 code, in: AIAA, 43rd Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Denver, CO, April 2002, AIAA-2002-1596.
75. J.-N. Juang R.S. Pappa An eigensystem realization algorithm for modal parameter identification and model reduction Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 8 1985 620-627
76. M.S. Hong, G. Kuruvila, K.G. Bhatia, G. SenGupta, T. Kim, Evaluation of CFL3D for unsteady pressure and flutter predictions, in: 44th AIAA/ASME/ ASCE/AHS Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Norfolk, VA, April 2003, AIAA-2003-1923.
77. D.E. Raveh, Identification of CFD-based unsteady aerodynamic models for aeroelastic analysis, in: 44th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Norfolk, VA, April 2003, AIAA-2003-1407.
78. G.P. Guruswamy, S. Obayashi, Use of high fidelity methods in multidisciplinary optimization - a preliminary study, in: 9th AIAA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Atlanta, GA, September 2002, AIAA-2002-5638
79. J.R.R.A. Martins, J.J. Alonso, J.J. Reuther, High fidelity aero-structural design optimization of a supersonic business jet, in: 43rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Denver, CO, April 2000, AIAA-2002-1483.
80. J.R.R.A. Martins, J.J. Alonso, J.J. Reuther, Complete configuration aero-structural optimization using a coupled sensitivity analysis method, in: 9th AIAA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Atlanta, GA, September 2002, AIAA-2002-5402.
81. J.R.R.A. Martins, J.J. Alonso, J.J. Reuther, Aero-structural wing design optimization using high-fidelity sensitivity analysis, in: CEAS Conference on Multidisciplinary Aircraft Design Optimization, Cologne, Germany, June 2001, pp. 211-226
82. J.J. Reuther, J.J. Alonso, J.R.R.A. Martins, S.C. Smith, A coupled aero-structural optimization method for complete aircraft configurations, in: 37th AIAA, Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, January 1999, AIAA-99-0187.
83. S. Aryasomayajila H. Wang R. Grandhi F. Eastep Multidisciplinary design of vehicle Structures with improved roll maneuverability - transonic regime J. Aircraft 38 4 2001 664-671
84. D.J. Neill E.H. Johnson R.A. Canfield ASTROS - a multidisciplinary automated structural design tool J. Aircraft 27 12 1990 1021-1027
85. M. Karpel Modal-based enhancement of integrated structural design optimization schemes J. Aircraft 35 3 1998 437-444