Developing standards for trail conditions using image capture technology

Leisure Sciences

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 279-295

  Kim, Sang Oh ^a   Shelby, Bo ^b  

^a Chonnam National University   (South Korea)

^b OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Image capture technology; Measurements alternatives; Normative standards; Preferences; Trail impacts

Indexed keywords

OUTDOOR RECREATION; PHOTOGRAPHY; QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY; RECREATIONAL MANAGEMENT;

ASIA; EASTERN HEMISPHERE; EURASIA; FAR EAST; KOREA; KWANGJU [SOUTH KOREA]; MUDEUNG MOUNTAIN PROVINCIAL PARK; SOUTH KOREA; WORLD;

EID: 19944383833     PISSN: 01490400     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01490400590930916     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Cancian, F. M. (1975). What are norms?: A study of beliefs and action in Maya community. New York: Cambridge University Press.
2. Cole, D. N. (1991). Changes on trails in the Selway-Bitterroot Wilderness, Montana, 1979-89 (Research Paper INT-450). USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station.
3. Cole, D. N., Petersen, M. E., & Lucas, R. C. (1987). Managing wilderness recreation use: Common problems and potential solutions (Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-230). USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station.
4. Donnelly, M. P., Vaske, J. J., & Shelby, B. (1992). Measuring backcountry standards in visitor surveys. Defining wilderness quality: The role of standards in wilderness management-A workshop proceedings (Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-305, pp. 38-52). Portland, OR: USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.
5. Dunn, M. C. (1976). Landscape with photographs: Testing the preference approach to landscape evaluation. Journal of Environmental Management, 11, 15-26.
6. Freimund, W. A., Vaske, J. J., Donnelly, M. P., & Miller, T. A. (2002). Using video surveys to access dispersed backcountry visitors' norms. Leisure Sciences, 24, 349-362.
7. Graefe, A. R., Kuss, F. R., & Vaske, J. J. (1986). Recreation impacts and carrying capacity: A visitor impact management framework. Washington, DC: National Parks and Conservation Association.
8. Hall, T. & Roggenbuck, J. W. (2002). Response format effects in questions about norms: Implications for the reliability and validity of the normative approach. Leisure Sciences, 24, 325-337.
9. Hall, T., Shelby, B., & Rolloff, D. (1996). Effect of varied question format on boaters' norms. Leisure Sciences, 18, 193-204.
10. Inglis, G. J., Johnson, V. I., & Ponte, F. (1999). Crowding norms in marine settings: A case study of snorkeling on the Great Barrier Reef. Environmental Management, 24, 369-381.
11. Jackson, J. M. (1965). Structural characteristics of norms. In I. D. Steiner & M. F. Fishbein (eds.), Current Studies in Social Psychology (pp. 301-309). New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
12. Kim, S. O., Lee, C. H., & Shelby, B. (2003). Utilization of photographs in determining impact indicators for trail management. Environmental Management, 32, 282-289.
13. Kim, S. O. & Oh, K. I. (1998). Present use of trails and influential factors on trail selection: In Mudeung-san Provincial Park. Journal of Korean Forestry Society, 87, 131-144.
14. Kim, S. O. & Shelby, B. (1998). Norms for behavior and conditions in two national park campgrounds in Korea. Environmental Management, 22, 277-285.
15. Manning, R. E. (1999). Studies in Outdoor Recreation. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University Press.
16. Manning, R. E., Lawson, S., Newman, P., Laven, D., & Valliere, W. (2002). Methodological issues in measuring crowding-related norms in outdoor recreation. Leisure Sciences, 24, 339-348.
17. Manning, R. E. & Lime, D, W. (1996). Crowding and carrying capacity in the national park system: Toward a social science research agenda. In D. W. Lime (ed.), Congestion and crowding in the national park system: Guidelines for management and research (Miscellaneous Publication 86-1996, pp. 27-66). St. Paul, MN: Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Minnesota.
18. Manning, R. E., Lime, D. W., Freimund, W., & Pitt, D. (1996). Crowding norms at frontcountry sites: A visual approach to setting standards of quality. Leisure Sciences, 18, 39-59.
19. Manning, R. E., Valliere, W., Wang, B., & Jacobi, C. (1999). Crowding nonns: Alternative measurement approaches. Leisure Sciences, 21, 97-115.
20. Martin, S. R., McCool, S. F., & Lucas, R. C. (1989). Wilderness campsite impacts: Do managers and visitors see them the same? Environmental Management, 13, 623-629.
21. Martinson, K. S. & Shelby, B. (1992). Encounter and proximity norms for salmon anglers in California and New Zealand. North American Journal of Fisheries Management. 12, 559-567.
22. Mudeung-Mountain Provincial Park Management Office. (1996). The present conditions of Mundeu ng-Mountain Natural Park. In Association of Mudeungsan Protection (ed.), Mudeungsan Sarang (pp. 5-16). Gwang-ju City: Association of Mudeungsan Protection.
23. Needham, M. D. & Rollins, R. B. (in press). Interest group standards for recreation and tourism impacts at ski areas in the summer. Tourism Management.
24. Roggenbuck, J. W., Williams, D. R., Bange, S. P., & Dean, D. J. (1991). River float trip encounter norms: Questioning the use of the social norms concept. Journal of Leisure Research, 23, 133-153.
25. Shelby, B. (1981). Encounter norms in backcountry settings: Studies of three rivers. Journal of Leisure Research, 13, 129-138.
26. Shelby, B. & Harris, R. L. (1985). Comparing methods for determining visitor evaluations of ecological impacts: Site visits, photographs, and written descriptions. Journal of Leisure Research, 17, 57-67.
27. Shelby, B. & Heberlein, T. A. (1986). Carrying capacity in recreation settings. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University Press.
28. Shelby, B. & Shindler, B. (1992). Interest group standards for ecological impacts at wilderness campsites. Leisure Sciences, 14, 17-27.
29. Shelby, B. & Vaske, J. J. (1991). Using normative data to develop evaluative standards for resource management: A comment on three recent papers. Journal of Leisure Research, 23, 173-187.
30. Shelby, B., Vaske, J. J, & Donnelly, M. P. (1996). Norms, standards, and natural resources. Leisure Sciences, 18, 103-123.
31. Shelby, B., Vaske, J. J., & Harris, R. (1988). User standards for ecological impacts at wilderness campsites. Journal of Leisure Research, 20, 245-256.
32. Shelby, B. Vaske, J. J., & Heberlein, T. A. (1989). Comparative analysis of crowding in multiple locations: Results from fifteen years of research. Leisure Sciences, 11, 269-291.
33. Shelby, B., & Whittaker, D. (1995). Flows and recreation quality on the Dolores River: Integrating overall and specific evaluations. Rivers, 5, 121-132.
34. Shuttleworth, S. (1980). The use of photographs as an environmental presentation medium in landscape studies. Journal of Environmental Management, 11, 61-76.
35. Stankey, G. H., Cole, D. N., Lucas, R. C., Petersen, M. E., & Frissell, S. S. (1985). The limits of acceptable change (LAC) system for wilderness planning (Report INT-176). Ogden, UT: USDA Forest Service.
36. Tarrant, M. A. & Manfredo, M. J. (1993). Digit preference, recall bias, and nonresponse bias in self reports of angling participation. Leisure Sciences, 15, 231-238.
37. Vaske, J. J. (1977). The relationship between personal norms, social norms and reported contacts in Brule River visitors' perception of crowding. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Wisconsin, Madison.
38. Vaske, J. J., Beaman, J., Manfredo, M. J., Covey, D. D., & Knox, R. (1996). Response strategy, recall frame and digit preference in self-reports of angling participation. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 1, 54-68.
39. Vaske, J. J. & Donnelly, M. P. (1988). Normative evaluations of wildlife management: A comparison of three publics. Paper presented at the annual congress of National Parks and Recreation Association, Indianapolis, IN.
40. Vaske, J. J., Donnelly, M. P., & Shelby, B. (1993). Establishing management standards: Selected examples of the normative approach. Environmental Management, 17, 629-643.
41. Vaske, J. J., Gliner, J. A., & Morgan, G. A. (2002). Communicating judgments about practical significance: Effect size, confidence intervals and odds ratios. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 7, 287-300.
42. Vaske, J. J., Shelby, B., Graefe, A. R., & Heberlein, T. A. (1986). Backcountry encounter norms: Theory, method and empirical evidence. Journal of Leisure Research, 18, 137-153.
43. Wang, B. & Manning, R. E. (1999). Computer simulation modeling for recreation management: A study on carriage road use in Acadia National Park, Maine, USA. Environmental Management, 23, 193-203.
44. Whittaker, D. & Shelby, B. (1988). Types of norms for recreation impacts: Extending the social norms concept. Journal of Leisure Research, 20, 261-273.
45. Whittaker, D. & Shelby, B. (1992). Developing good standards: Criteria, characteristics, and sources. Defining wilderness quality: The role of standards in wilderness management-A workshop proceedings (Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-305, pp. 6-12). Portland, OR: USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.
46. Whittaker, D. & Shelby, B. (2002). Evaluating instream flows for recreation: Applying the structural norm approach to biophysical conditions. Leisure Sciences, 24, 363-374.
47. Williams, D. R., Roggenbuck, J. W., & Bange, S. (1991). The effect of norm-encounter compatibility on crowding perceptions, experience and behavior in river recreation settings. Journal of Leisure Research, 23, 154-172.