Direct observation of charge inversion by multivalent ions as a universal electrostatic phenomenon

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 93, Issue 17, 2004, Pages

  Besteman, K ^a   Zevenbergen, M A G ^a   Heering, H A ^a   Lemay, S G ^a  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; ELECTROSTATICS; EPOXY RESINS; HYDRODYNAMICS; IMAGE ANALYSIS; OPTICAL MICROSCOPY; POISSON EQUATION; SILICA; SURFACE STRUCTURE;

CHARGE DENSITY; CHARGE INVERSIONS; POISSION-BOLTZMANN; SPATIAL CORRELATIONS;

IONS;

EID: 19744382442     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.170802     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. V. A. Bloomfield, Biopolymers 44, 269 (1998).
2. T. E. Angelini et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 8634 (2003).
3. R. O. James and T. W. Healey, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 40, 42 (1972); 40, 53 (1972); 40, 65 (1972).
4. R. O. James and T. W. Healey, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 40, 42 (1972); 40, 53 (1972); 40, 65 (1972).
5. R. O. James and T. W. Healey, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 40, 42 (1972); 40, 53 (1972); 40, 65 (1972).
6. A. Martín-Molina et al., J. Chem. Phys. 118, 4183 (2003).
7. R. M. Pashley, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 102, 23 (1984).
8. K. B. Agashe and J. R. Regalbuto, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 185, 174 (1996).
9. V. Vithayaveroj, S. Yiacoumi, and C. Tsouris, J. Disp. Sci. Technol. 24, 517 (2003).
10. For comprehensive reviews, see A. Yu. Grosberg, T. T. Nguyen, and B. I. Shklovskii, Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 329 (2002); Y. Levin, Rep. Prog. Phys. 65, 1577 (2002); M. Quesada-Pérez et al., Chem. Phys. Chem. 4, 234 (2003).
11. For comprehensive reviews, see A. Yu. Grosberg, T. T. Nguyen, and B. I. Shklovskii, Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 329 (2002); Y. Levin, Rep. Prog. Phys. 65, 1577 (2002); M. Quesada-Pérez et al., Chem. Phys. Chem. 4, 234 (2003).
12. For comprehensive reviews, see A. Yu. Grosberg, T. T. Nguyen, and B. I. Shklovskii, Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 329 (2002); Y. Levin, Rep. Prog. Phys. 65, 1577 (2002); M. Quesada-Pérez et al., Chem. Phys. Chem. 4, 234 (2003).
13. B. I. Shklovskii, Phys. Rev. E 60, 5802 (1999).
14. W. A. Ducker, T. J. Senden, and R. M. Pashley, Langmuir 8, 1831 (1992).
15. 0 is of the same order as that from other sources.
16. -) diameter. Agrees within 4% with crystallographic data.
17. R. D. Shannon, Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A 32, 751 (1976).
18. Y. Marcus, Ion Properties (Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, 1997), Chap. 3.
19. All measurements were done at pH less than the first hydrolysis constant of the ions; J. Burgess, Metal Ions in Solution (Ellis Horwood, Chichester, England, 1979).
20. Crystal structure with van der Waals radii; A. Bacchi, F. Ferranti, and G. Pelizzi, Acta Crystallogr. Sect. C 49, 1163 (1993).
21. The supporting electrolyte was a 1 mM HEPES (4-(2-hydroxyethyl) piperazine-1-ethanesulfonic acid) buffer, pH 7.0 ± 0.3 set by adding KOH.
22. The supporting electrolyte was a mixture of 0.3 mM KOH and HCl with pH 6.5 ± 0.5.
23. The supporting electrolyte was the same as [18] with pH 5.8 ± 0.3.
24. The supporting electrolyte was a 0.1 mM MES (2-morpholinoethanesulfonic acid) buffer, pH 6.0 ± 0.3 set by adding KOH.
25. R. K. Her, The Chemistry of Silica (Wiley, New York, 1979).