Localization of the Cu(111) surface state by single Cu adatoms

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 93, Issue 20, 2004, Pages

  Olsson, F E ^a   Persson, M ^a   Borisov, A G ^b   Gauyacq, J P ^b   Lagoute, J ^c   Folsch S ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SACLAY   (France)

^c PAUL DRUDE INSTITUT FÜR FESTKÖRPERELEKTRONIK   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARRIER CONCENTRATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELECTRIC FIELDS; ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; LAPLACE TRANSFORMS; NANOTECHNOLOGY; PERTURBATION TECHNIQUES; PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION;

FULL WIDTH AT HALF MAXIMUM (FWHM); LOCAL DENSITY OF STATES (LDOS); RESONANCE STATE DECAYING; SHOCKLEY SURFACE STATES;

COPPER;

EID: 19744373747     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.206803     Document Type: Review

References (35)

1. M. F. Crommie, C. P. Lutz, and D. M. Eigler, Nature (London) 363, 524 (1993).
2. H. C. Manoharen, C. P. Lutz, and D. M. Eigler, Nature (London) 403, 512 (2000).
3. E. Wahlström et al., Appl. Phys. A 66, S1107 (1998).
4. J. Repp et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2981 (2000).
5. M. F. Crommie, C. P. Lutz, and D. M. Eigler, Science 262, 218 (1993).
6. V. Madhavan et al., Science 280, 567 (1998).
7. J. Li et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2893 (1998).
8. A. G. Borisov, A. K. Kazansky, and J. P. Gauyacq, Phys. Rev. B 65, 205414 (2002).
9. B. Simon, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 97, 279 (1976).
10. J. P. Gauyacq, A. G. Borisov, and A. K. Kazansky, Appl. Phys. A 78, 141 (2004).
11. F. E. Olsson et al., Phys. Rev. B (to be published).
12. S. Fölsch et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 56803 (2004).
13. R. M. Feenstra, Surf. Sci. 299/300 965 (1994).
14. P. O. Gartland and B. J. Slagsvold, Phys. Rev. B 12, 4047 (1975).
15. S. D. Kevan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 526 (1983).
16. E. V. Chulkov, V. M. Silkin, and P. M. Echenique, Surf. Sci. 437, 330 (1999).
17. J. Tersoff and D. R. Hamann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1998 (1983).
18. N. D. Lang, Phys. Rev. B 34, 5947 (1986).
19. A. Selloni et al., Phys. Rev. B 31, 2602 (1984).
20. A. G. Borisov, A. K. Kazansky, and J. P. Gauyacq, Phys. Rev. B 59, 10935 (1999).
21. 0 was chosen as a Gaussian with FWHM of 1 Å centered 6 Å outside the Cu(111) image plane.
22. 0 in z and p.
23. L. Limot et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 196801 (2003).
24. P. Wahl et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 106802 (2003).
25. In the calculations we used a 4-layer slab with 4 × 4 Cu atoms in each layer. The surface Brillouin zone was sampled using 3 × 3 k points. Only the Cu adatom was geometrically optimized Cu binds in the threefold hollow fee site [26] at a calculated distance of 1.86 Å outside the topmost surface layer.
26. J. Repp et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 206102 (2003).
27. G. Kresse and J. Furthmüller, Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169 (1996).
28. L. Kleinman and D. M. Bylander, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 1425 (1982).
29. V. Madhavan et al., Phys. Rev. B 64, 165412 (2001).
30. L. Limot and R. Berndt (private communication).
31. P. Avouris, I. W. Lyo, and P. Molinas-Mata, Chem. Phys. Lett. 240, 423 (1995).
32. J. E. Ortega et al., Phys. Rev. B 49, 13859 (1994).
33. L. Bartels et al. Phys. Rev. B 67, 205416 (2003).
34. K. Bobrov et al. Nature (London) 413, 616 (2001).
35. See articles in Faraday Discuss. 117 (2000).