Procedural and distributive justice effects moderated by organizational identification

Journal of Managerial Psychology

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 4-13

  Cremer, David ^a  

^a TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Corporate identity; Employee behaviour; Interaction; Justice

Indexed keywords

EID: 19644397620     PISSN: 02683946     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/02683940510571603     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Aiken, L.S. and West, S.G. (1991), Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions, Sage, New York, NY.
2. Branden, N. (1998), Self-esteem at Work, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
3. Brockner, J. (2002), “Making sense of procedural fairness: how high procedural fairness can reduce or heighten the influence of outcome favorability”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 27 No. 1, pp. 58-76.
4. Brockner, J. and Wiesenfeld, B.M. (1996), “An integrative framework for explaining reactions to decisions: interactive effects of outcomes and procedures”, Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 120 No. 2, pp. 189-208.
5. Brockner, J., Chen, Y., Mannix, E.A., Leung, K. and Skarlicki, D.P. (2000), “Cross-cultural variation in the interactive relationship between procedural fairness and outcome favorability: the case of self-construal”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 45, pp. 138-159.
6. Colquitt, J.A. (2001), “On the dimensionality of organizational justice: a construct validation of a measure”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 86, pp. 386-400.
7. Cropanzano, R. and Ambrose, M.L. (2001), “Procedural and distributive justice are more similar than you think: a monistic perspective and a research agenda”, in Ed. Greenberg, J. and Ed. Cropanzano, R. (Eds), Advances in Organizational Justice, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, pp. 119-151.
8. Deutsch, M. (1985), Distributive Justice, New Haven, University Press, New Haven, CT.
9. De Cremer, D. and van Vugt, M. (1999), “Social identification effects in social dilemmas: a transformation of motives”, Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 29, pp. 871-893.
10. Dutton, J.E., Dukerich, J.M. and Harquail, C.V. (1994), “Organizational images and member identification”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 39 June, pp. 239-263.
11. Folger, R. (1977), “Distributive and procedural justice: combined impact of ‘voice’ and improvement of experienced inequity”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 35, pp. 108-119.
12. Folger, R. and Cropanzano, R. (1998), Organizational Justice and Human Resource Management, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.
13. Greenberg, J. (1990), “Organizational justice: yesterday, today, and tomorrow”, Journal of Management, Vol. 16 June, pp. 399-432.
14. Heuer, L., Penrod, S., Hafer, C.L. and Cohn, I. (2002), “The role of resource and relational concerns for procedural justice”, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 28 No. 11, pp. 1468-1482.
15. Kwong, J.Y.Y. and Leung, K. (2002), “A moderator of the interaction effect of procedural justice and outcome favorability: importance of the relationship”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 81 No. 2, pp. 278-299.
16. Leventhal, G.S. (1980), “What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the fairness in social relationships”, in Ed. Gergen, K., Ed. Greenberg, M. and Ed. Willis, R. (Eds), Social Exchange Theory, Plenum, New York, NY, pp. 27-55.
17. Lind, E.A. and Tyler, T.R. (1988), The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice, Plenum, New York, NY.
18. McAllister, D.J. and Bigley, G.A. (2002), “Work context and the definition of self: how organizational care influences organization-based self-esteem”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 45, pp. 894-904.
19. Mael, F. and Ashforth, B.E. (1992), “Alumni and their alma mater: a partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 103-123.
20. Moorman, R.H. and Blakely, G.L. (1995), “Individualism-collectivism as an individual difference predictor of organizational citizenship behavior”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 16, pp. 127-142.
21. Pfeffer, J. (1998), “Understanding organizations: concepts and controversies”, in Ed. Gilbert, D., Ed. Fiske, S. and Ed. Lindzey, G. (Eds), The Handbook of Social Psychology, 4th ed., Oxford University Press, New York, NY, pp. 733-777.
22. Tyler, T.R. (1989), “The psychology of procedural justice: a test of the group value model”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 57, pp. 333-344.
23. Tyler, T.R. (1994), “Psychological models of the justice motive: Antecedents of distributive and procedural justice”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 67 No. 5, pp. 850-853.
24. Tyler, T.R. (1999), “Why people cooperate with organizations: an identity-based perspective”, Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 21, pp. 201-246.
25. Tyler, T.R. and Lind, E.A. (1992), “A relational model of authority in groups”, in Ed. Zanna, M. (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 25, Academic Press, New York, NY, pp. 115-119.
26. van Knippenberg, D. (2000), “Work motivation and performance: a social identity perspective”, Applied Psychology: An International Review, Vol. 49, pp. 357-371.
27. van Knippenberg, D. and van Schie, E.C.M. (2000), “Foci and correlates of organizational identification”, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 73, pp. 137-147.
28. Wiesenfeld, B.M., Brockner, J. and Thibault, V. (2000), “Procedural fairness, managers’ self-esteem and managerial behaviors following a layoff”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 83, pp. 1-32.