The frame of canonical theory of heredity: From genes to evolution

Zhurnal Obshchei Biologii

Volumn 66, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 99-122

  Tchuraev, R N ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF BIOLOGY   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; GENETIC CODE; GENETICS; GENOME IMPRINTING; HEREDITY; MUTAGENESIS; PHYLOGENY; REVIEW; SYSTEMS THEORY;

ANIMALS; GENETIC CODE; GENOMIC IMPRINTING; HEREDITY; MODELS, GENETIC; MUTAGENESIS; PHYLOGENY; SYSTEMS THEORY;

EID: 19544382224     PISSN: 00444596     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (74)

1. Arbib M.A., 1972. The metaphorical brain. N. Y.: Wiley-Interscience. 285 p.
2. Beisson J., Sonneborn T.M., 1965. Cytoplasmic inheritance of the organization of the cell cortex in Paramecium aurelia // Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. V. 53. P. 275-282.
3. Belyaev D.K., Ruvinsky A.O., Agulnik A.I., Agulnik S.I., 1983. Effect of hydrocortisone on the phenotypic expression and inheritance of the fused gene in mice // Theor. Appl. Genet. V. 64. P. 275-281.
4. Bird A., 2002. DNA methilation patterns and epigenetic memory // Genes Dev. V. 16. P. 6-21.
5. Blau H.M., 1992. Differentiation requires continuous active control // Ann. Rev. Biochem. V. 61. P. 1213-1230.
6. Cavalli G., Paro R., 1998. Chromo-domain proteins: linking chromatin structure to epigenetic regulation // Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. V. 10. P. 354-360.
7. Cavalli G., Paro R., 1999. Epigenetic inheritance of active chromatin after removal of the main transactivator // Science. V. 286. P. 955-958.
8. Cline T.W., 1993. The Drosophila sex determination signal: how do flies count to two // Trends in Genet. V. 9. No 11. P. 385-390.
9. Cuvier G., 1800. Leçons d'anatomie comparée. Paris: Baudouin. V. 1. 384 p.
10. Dalgaard J.Z., Klar A.J., 1999. Orientation of DNA replication establishes mating-type switching pattern in S. pombe // Nature. V. 400. P. 181-184.
11. III proteins // Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. V. 68. P. 2190-2194.
12. Elsasser N.M., 1958. The physical foundation of biology. London: Pergamon Press. 298 p.
13. Fedoroff N.V., Schlappi M., Raina R., 1995. Epigenetic regulation of the maize Spm transposon // Bioessays. V. 17. No 4. P. 291-297.
14. Francis N.J., Kingston R.E., 2001. Mechanisms of transcriptional memory // Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. V. 2. P. 409-421.
15. Felsenfeld G., McGhee J., 1982. Methylation and gene control // Nature. V. 296. P. 602-603.
16. Gardner T.S., Cantor C.R., Collins J.J., 2000. Construction of a genetic toggle switch in Escherichia coli // Nature. V. 403. P. 339-342.
17. Hadorn E., 1965. Genetic control of differentiation. N. Y.: Uptan. V. 18. No 4. P. 148-161.
18. Hawley D.K., McClure W.R., 1983. The effect of a lambda repressor mutation on the activation of transcription initiation from the lambda PRM promoter // Cell. V. 32. P. 327-333.
19. Holliday R., 1987. The inheritance of epigenetic defects // Science. V. 238. P. 163-170.
20. Holliday R., 1990. Mechanisms for the control of gene activity during development // Biol. Rev. V. 65. P. 431-471.
21. Holmes S.G., Braunstein M., Broad J., 1996. Transcriptional silencing of the yeast mating-type genes // Epigenetic mechanism of gene regulation / Eds Russo V.E.A., Martienssen R.A., Riggs A.G. N. Y.: Cold Spring Harbor Lab. Press. P. 467-487.
22. Jablonka E., Lamb M.J., 1989. The inheritance of acquired epigenetic variations // J. Theor. Biol. V. 139. P. 69-83.
23. Jablonka E., Lamb M.J., Avital E., 1998. "Lamarckian" mechanisms in Darwinian evolution // Trends in Ecol. and Evol. V. 13. No 5. P. 206-210.
24. Kananyan G. Ch., Ratner V.A., Tchuraev R.N., 1981. Enlarged model of lambda phase ontogenesis // J. Theor. Biol. V. 88. P. 393-407.
25. Keyes N.L., Cline T.W., Schedl P., 1992. The primary sex determination signal of Drosophila acts at the level of transcription // Cell. V. 68. P. 933-943.
26. Iino T., 1977. Genetics of structure and function of bacterial flagella // Ann. Rev. Genet. V. 11. P. 161-188.
27. Lanchmann M., Jablonka E., 1996. The inheritance of phenotypes: an adaptation to fluctuating environments // J. Theor. Biol. V. 181. P. 1-9.
28. Landman O.E., 1991. The inheritance of acquired characteristics // Ann. Rev. Genet. V. 25. P. 1-20.
29. Lemon B., Tjian R., 2000. Orchestrated response: a symphony of transcription factors for gene control // Genes and Development. V. 14. No 20. P. 2551-2569.
30. Marmorstein R., 2001. Protein modules that manipulate histone tails for chromatin regulation // Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. V. 2. P. 422-432.
31. th International Congress on Genetics (Ithaca, USA). V. 1. P. 213.
32. Pirotta V., 1996. Stable chromatin stress regulating homeotic genes in Drosophila // Epigenetic mechanism of gene regulation / Eds Russo V.W.A., Martienssen R.A., Riggs A.G. N. Y.: Cold Spring Harbor Lab. Press. P. 489-505.
33. Poux S., Horard B., Sigrist C.J., Pirrotta V., 2002. The Drosophila trithorax protein is a coactivator required to prevent re-establishment of polycomb silencing // Development. V. 129. P. 2483-2493.
34. Ratner V.A., Tchuraev R.N., 1978. Simplest genetic systems controlling ontogenesis: organization principles and models of their function // Progress in Theor. Biol. N. Y.: Acad. Press. V. 5. P. 81-127.
35. Riggs A.D., Bourgeois S., Cohn M., 1970. The lac repressor-operator interaction. 3. Kinetic studies // J. Mol. Biol. V. 53. P. 401-417.
36. Riggs A.D., Pfeifer G.P., 1992. X-chromosome inactivation and cell memory // TIG. V. 8. No 5. P. 169-173.
37. Riggs A.D., Porter T.N., 1996. Overview of epigenetic mechanisms // Epigenetic mechanism of gene regulation / Eds Russo V.W.A., Martienssen R.A., Riggs A.G. N. Y.: Cold Spring Harbor Lab. Press. P. 489-505.
38. Silverman M., Zieg J., Hilmen M., Simon M., 1979. Phase variation in Salmonella: genetic analysis of a recombinational switch // Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. V. 76. No I. P. 391-395.
39. Spirov A.V., Borovsky M., Spirova O.A., 2002. HOX Pro DB: the functional genomics of hox ensembles // Nucleic Acids Res. V. 30. No 1. P. 351-353.
40. Tchuraev R.N., 1980. On a stochastic model of a molecular genetic system capable of differentiation and reproduction of the initial state // Biom. J. V. 22. No 2. P. 189-194.
41. Tchuraev R.N., 1991. A new method for the analysis of the dynamics of the molecular genetic control systems. 1. Description of the method of the generalized threshold models // J. Theor. Biol. V. 151. P. 71-87.
42. Tchuraev R.N., 1997. The epigene hypothesic // Biopol. Gell. V. 12. P. 75-81.
43. Tchuraev R.N., 2000. On storing, coding, passing and processing the hereditary information in living system // Computational Technologies. V. 5. No 2. P. 100-111.
44. Tchuraev R.N., Stupak I.V., Tropynina T.S., Stupak E.E., 2000. Epigenes: design and construction of new hereditary units // FEBS Lett. V. 486. P. 200-202.
45. Weismann A., 1885. Das Keimplasma. Eine Theorie der Vererbung. Jena: G. Fischer. 401 p.
46. Wilmut I., Schnieke A.E., McWhir J., Kind A.J., Campbell K.H., 1997. Viable of spring derived from fetal and adult mammalian cells // Nature. V. 385. P. 810-813.
47. Wolffe A.P., Matzke M.A., 1999. Epigenetics: regulation through repression // Science. V. 286. P. 481-486.
48. Zieg J., Simon M., 1980. Analysis of the nucleotide sequence of an invertible controlling element // Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. V. 77. No 7. P. 4196-4200.