Supporting Collaboration in Virtual Learning Environments

Cyberpsychology and Behavior

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 197-200

  Joiner, Richard ^a  

^a University of Bath   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONFERENCE PAPER; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; GROUP DYNAMICS; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; LEARNING; SOCIAL INTERACTION; STUDENT; VIRTUAL REALITY;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; EDUCATION, DISTANCE; GROUP PROCESSES; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; LEARNING; NETHERLANDS; SOCIAL DISTANCE; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 1942518214     PISSN: 10949313     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/109493104323024456     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Bonito, J.A. & Hollingshead, A.B. (1997). Participation in small groups. Communications Yearbook 20:227-261.
2. Clapper, D.L., McLean, E.R., & Watson, R.T. (1991). An experimental investigation of the effect of group decision support on normative influence in small groups. In.: J.I. De Gross, I. Benbasat, G. DeSanctis, et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the twelfth international conference on information systems. New York: ACM Press, pp. 273-282.
3. The influence of face-to-face versus computer mediated communication channels on collective induction. Accounting, Management & Information Technology 3:1-22.
4. Dubrovsky, V.J., Kiesler, S., & Sethna, B.N. (1991). The equalisation phenomena: status effects in computer mediated and face-to-face decision making groups. Human-Computer Interaction 6:119-146.
5. George, J., Easton, G., Nunamaker, J., et al. (1990). A study of collaborative group work with and without computer based support. Information System Research 1:394-415.
6. Hiltz, S.R., Johnson, K., & Turoff, M. (1986). Experiments in group decision making, 1: communication processes and outcome in face-to-face vs. computerised conferences. Human Communication Research 13:225-252.
7. McLeod, P. L. (1992). An assessment of the experimental literature on electronic support of group work: results of a meta-analysis. Human-Computer Interaction 7:257-280.
8. Rice, R.E. (1984). Mediated group communication. In: R.E. Rice & associates (eds.), The new media: communication research and technology. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage, pp. 129-154.
9. Siegel, J., Dubrovsky, V., Kiesler, S., et al. (1986). Group processes in computer mediated communication. Organisational Behaviour & Human Decision Processes 37:157-187.
10. Straus, S. (1996). Getting a clue: the effects of communication media and information distribution on participation and performance in computer-mediated and face-to-face groups. Small Group Research 27:115-142.
11. Straus, S., & McGrath, J. E. (1994). Does the medium matter? The interaction of task type and technology on group performance and member reactions. Journal of Applied Psychology 79:87-97.
12. Hoadley, C.M., & Linn, M.C. (2000). Teaching science through online, peer discussions: speakeasy in the knowledge integration environment. International Journal of Science Education 22:839-857.
13. Marttunen, M., & Laurinen, L. (2001). Learning argumentation skills in networked and face-to-face environments. Instructional Science 29:127-153.
14. Berdahal, J.L., & Craig, K.L. (1996). Equality of participation and influence in groups: the effects of communication medium and sex composition. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 4:179-202.
15. Hollingshead, A. B. (1996). The rank order effect: decision, procedure, communication technology and group decisions. Organisational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes 68:1-13.
16. Lea, M., & Spears, R. (1991). Computer mediated communication, de-individuation, and group decision making. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 34:283-301.
17. McLeod, P.L., & Liker, J.K. (1992). Electronic meeting systems: evidence from a low structure environment. Information Systems Research 3:195-223.
18. Spears, R., & Lea, M.(1992). Social influence and the influence of the "social" in computer mediated communication. In: M. Lea (ed.), Contexts of computer-mediated communication. London: Harvester-Wheatsheaf, pp. 30-650.
19. Watson, R., DeSanctis, G., & Poole, M.S. (1988). Using GDSS to facilitate group consensus: some intended and unintended consequences. MIS Quarterly 12:463-478.
20. Weisband, S.P. (1992). Group decision and first advocacy effects in computer mediated and face-to-face decision making groups. Organisational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes 53:352-380.
21. Weisband, S.P., Schneider, S.K., & Connolly, T. (1995). Electronic communication and social information: status salience and status differences. Academy of Management Journal 38:1124-1151.
22. Gunawardena, C.N. (1995). Social presence theory and implications for interaction and collaborative learning in computer conferences. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications 1:147-166.
23. Kreijn, K., Kirschner, P.A., & Jochems, W. (2003). Indentifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer supported collaborative learning environments: a review of the research. Computers in Human Behaviour 19:335-353.
24. Hallett, K., & Cummings, J. (1997). The virtual classroom as authentic experience. Presented at the Annual Conference on Distance Teaching and Learning: Competition-Connection-Collaboration, Madison, WI.
25. Mercer, N. (2003). Guided construction of knowledge: talk amongst teachers and learners. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
26. Kirschner, P.A., Srtijbos, J.W., & Martens, R.L. (2004). CSCL in higher education? A framework for designing multiple collaborative environments. In: Strijbos, J.W., Kirschner, P.A., & Martens, R.L. (eds.), What we know about CSCL in higher education. Dordrecht, NL: Kluwer.
27. Baltes, B.B., Dickenson, M.W., Sherman, M.P., et al. (2002). Computer-mediated communication and group decision making: a meta analysis. Organisational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes 87:156-179.
28. Kollar, I., Fischer, F., & Hesse, F.W. (2003). Computer-supported cooperation scripts. Presented at the Tenth Conference for the European Association for Learning and Instruction.
29. Guzdial, M. & Turns, J. (2000). Effective discussion through a computer mediated anchored forum. Journal of the Learning Sciences 9:437-469.
30. Palinscar, A.S., & Brown, A.L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition & Instruction 1:117-175.