Learning with Idealized Kernels

Proceedings, Twentieth International Conference on Machine Learning

Volumn 1, Issue , 2003, Pages 400-407

  Kwok, James T ^a   Tsang, Ivor W ^a  

^a HONG KONG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SCIENCE; OPTIMIZATION; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; PROBLEM SOLVING; RADIAL BASIS FUNCTION NETWORKS; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS;

KERNEL METHODS; LINEAR COMBINATION; TRANSDUCTION;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 1942516950     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Amari, S., & Wu, S. (1999). Improving support vector machine classifiers by modifying kernel functions. Neural Networks, 12, 783-789.
2. Chapelle, O., Vapnik, V., Bousquet, O., & Mukherjee, S. (2002). Choosing multiple parameters for support vector machines. Machine Learning, 46, 131-159.
3. Crammer, K., Keshet, J., & Singer, Y. (2003). Kernel design using boosting. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 15. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Cristianini, N., Kandola, J., Elisseeff, A., & Shawe-Taylor, J. (2002a). On kernel target alignment. Submitted to Journal of Machine Learning Research.
5. Cristianini, N., & Shawe-Taylor, J. (2000). An introduction to support vector machines. Cambridge University Press.
6. Cristianini, N., Shawe-Taylor, J., Elisseeff, A., & Kandola, J. (2002b). On kernel-target alignment. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 14. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Grandvalet, Y., & Canu, S. (2003). Adaptive scaling for feature selection in SVMs. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 15. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. Lanckriet, G., Cristianini, N., Bartlett, P., El Ghaoui, L., & Jordan, M. (2002). Learning the kernel matrix with semi-definite programming. Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning (pp. 323-330).
9. Ong, C., Smola, A., & Williamson, R. (2003). Superkernels. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 15. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. Roweis, S., & Saul, L. (2000). Nonlinear dimensional-ity reduction by locally linear embedding. Science, 290, 2323-2326.
11. Schölkopf, B., & Smola, A. (2002). Learning with kernels. MIT.
12. Schölkopf, B., Smola, A., Williamson, R., & Bartlett, P. (2000). New support vector algorithms. Neural Computation, 12, 1207-1245.
13. Sollich, P. (2002). Bayesian methods for support vector machines: Evidence and predictive class probabilities. Machine Learning, 46, 21-52.
14. Vapnik, V. (1998). Statistical learning theory. New York: Wiley.
15. Wettschereck, D., Aha, D., & Mohri, T. (1997). A review and empirical evaluation of feature weighting methods for a class of lazy learning algorithms. Artificial Intelligence Review, 11, 273-314.
16. Xing, E., Ng, A., Jordan, M., & Russell, S. (2003). Distance metric learning, with application to clustering with side-information. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 15. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. Zhang, Z., Kwok, J., Yeung, D., & Wang, W. (2002). A novel distance-based classifier using convolution kernels and Euclidean embeddings (Technical Report HKUST-CS02-28). Department of Computer Science, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology.