Modeling the Choice to Use Toll and High-Occupancy Vehicle Facilities

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 1854, 2003, Pages 135-143

  Erhardt, Gregory D ^a   Koppelman, Frank S ^b   Freedman, Joel ^c   Davidson, William A ^c   Mullins, Andrew ^c  

^a Denver Regl Council of Governments   (United States)

^b NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COSTS; HIGHWAY ENGINEERING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; ROADS AND STREETS; TRAFFIC SURVEYS; TRANSPORTATION; VEHICLES;

HIGH-OCCUPANCY VEHICLES (HOV); TRANSPORTATION MODELS;

TOLL BRIDGES;

EID: 1942504898     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/1854-15     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. Brunk, J. C., and M. D. Middleton. Incorporating Toll-Lane and High-Occupancy Toll-Lane Effects into the Dallas System Planning Methodology. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1659, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1999, pp. 105-110.
2. Eash, R. Equilibrium Traffic Assignment with High-Occupancy Vehicle Lanes. In Transportation Research Record 1394, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1993, pp. 42-48.
3. Ekanem, N. F., and A. I. Akpan. A Probability Model of the Use of Toll Routes When Non-Toll Alternatives Exist. Transportation Quarterly, Vol. 50, No. 3, 1996, pp. 149-158.
4. Lam, T. C., and K. A. Small. The Value of Time and Reliability: Measurement from a Value Pricing Experiment. Transportation Research E, Vol. 37, 2001, pp. 231-251.
5. Sullivan, E. C., and J. El Harake. California Route 91 Toll Lanes: Impacts and Other Observations. In Transportation Research Record 1649, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1998, pp. 55-62.
6. Mastako, K. A., L. R. Rillett, and E. C. Sullivan, Commuter Behavior on California State Route 91 After Introducing Variable-Toll Express Lanes. In Transportation Research Record 1649, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1998, pp. 47-54.
7. Lerman, S. R., and C. F. Manski. Alternative Sampling Procedures for Calibrating Disaggregate Choice Models. In Transportation Research Record 592, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1976, pp. 24-28.
8. Lerman, S. R., and C. F. Manski. Sample Design for Discrete Choice Analysis of Travel Behavior: The State of the Art. Transportation Research A, Vol. 13, 1979, pp. 29-44.
9. Koppelman, F. S., and C.-H. Wen. Nested Logit Models: Which Are You Using? In Transportation Research Record 1645, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1998, pp. 1-7.
10. Koppelman, F. S., and C. H. Wen, Alternative Nested Logit Models: Structure, Properties, and Estimation. Transportation Research B, Vol. 32, 1998, pp. 289-298.
11. Koppelman, F. S., V. Sethi, and C. H. Wen. Alternative Nested Logit Models: A Response to Comments by Andrew Daly on an Earlier Paper of Frank Koppelman and Chieh-Hua Wen. Transportation Research B, Vol. 35, 2001, pp. 725-729.
12. Sheffi, Y. Urban Transportation Networks: Equilibrium Analysis with Mathematical Programming Methods. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1985.