E-commerce user behavior model: An empirical study

Human Systems Management

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 265-276

  Jiang, James J ^a   Hsu, Maxwell K ^b   Klein, Gary ^c   Lin, Binshan ^d  

^a LOUISIANA TECH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^d LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Internet usage; Perceived Internet consequences; Technology acceptance model

Indexed keywords

EID: 0012909494     PISSN: 01672533     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. J.C. Anderson and D.W. Gerbing, Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach, Psychological Bulletin 103 (1988), 411-423.
2. M.G. Briones, Found on the Information Superhighway, Marketing News (June 21, 1999), 7.
3. M. Carrol, Asia loosens Internet access, Electronic Engineering Times (August 7, 1995), 68.
4. P.Y.K. Chau, An empirical assessment of a modified technology acceptance model, Journal of Management Information Systems 13(2) (1996), 185-204.
5. J. Chidley and S. Driedger, Cyber time, MaClean's 109(49), 68.
6. P. Clemente, The State of the Net: The New Frontier, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 1998.
7. M.J. Culnan, The dimensions of accessibility to on-line information: implications for implementing office information systems, ACM Transactions of Office Information Systems 2(2) (1984), 141-150.
8. R.L. Daft and R.H. Lengel, Organizational information requirements media richness and structural design, Management Science 32(5) (1986), 554-571.
9. F.D. Davis, A Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End-User Informational Systems: Theory and Results, Doctoral Dissertation, Sloan School of Management, MIT, 1986.
10. F. Davis, Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology, MIS Quarterly 13(3) (1989), 319-340.
11. F.D. Davis, R.P. Bagozzi and P.R. Warshaw, User acceptance of Computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models, Management Science 35(8) (1989), 982-1003.
12. E.D. Honeycutt, Jr., T.B. Flaherty and K. Benassi, Marketing industrial products on the Internet, Industrial Marketing Management 27 (1998), 63-72.
13. M.S. Feldman, Electronic mail and weak ties in organizations, Office Technology and People 3(2) (1987), 83-101.
14. C. Fornell and D.F. Larcker, Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error, Journal of Marketing Research 18 (1981), 39-50.
15. M. Igbaria, T. Guimaraes and G.B. Davis, Testing the determinants of microcomputer usage via a structural equation model, Journal of Management Information Systems 11(4) (1995), 87-114.
16. M. Igbaria, S. Parasuraman and J.J. Baroudi, A motivational model of microcomputer usage. Journal of Management Information Systems 13(1) (1996), 127-143.
17. S.M. Lee, Y.R. Kim and J. Lee, An empirical study of the relationships among end-user information systems acceptance, training, and effectiveness, Journal of Management Information Systems 12(2) (1995), 189-202.
18. H.P. Lu and D.H. Gustafson, An empirical study of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use on computerized support system use over time, International Journal of Information Management 14(5) (1994), 317-329.
19. M.L. Markus and D. Robey, The organizational validity of management information systems, Human Relations 36(3) (1983), 203-226.
20. M.L. Markus, Electronic mail as a medium of managerial choice, Organization Science 5(4) (1994), 502-527.
21. Meckermedia Corp. 20 Ketchum Street, Westport, CT 06880; http://www.internet.com. (1998).
22. D.Q. Mills and B. Friesen, The learning organization, European Management Journal 10(2) (1992), 146-156.
23. G.C. Moore and I. Benbasat, Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adoption an information technology innovation, Information Systems Research 2(3) (1991), 192-222.
24. Network Wizards, Internet domain survey, www.nw.com (1999).
25. Nua, Nua Internet surveys, www.nua.ie (1999).
26. J.C. Nunnally, Psychometric Theory, 2nd edn, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1978.
27. N. Piliskin, Interacting with electronic mail can be a dream or a nightmare: a user's point of view, Interacting With Computers 1(3) (1989), 259-272.
28. N. Piliskin, L.D. Ball and K.F. Curley, Impediments to proliferation of electronic mail: a study from the user's perspective, Human Systems Management 8(3) (1989), 233-241.
29. N. Pilskin and T. Romm, Design of charging mechanisms according to the interaction between information technology type and diffusion life cycle phase, Database 21(3) (1990), 34-40.
30. J. Pitta, Laissez-Faire not spoken here - France's resistance to the Internet, Forbes 160(12) (1997), 58.
31. R.A. Sproull, Lesson in electronic mail, in: Connections: New Ways of Working in the Network, Sproull and Kiesler, eds, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1991.
32. J. Strauss and F. Raymond, Marketing on The Internet, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1999.
33. M. Tan and T.S.H. Teo, Factors influencing the adoption of the Internet, International Journal of Electronic Commerce 2(3) (1998), 16-24.
34. T.S.H. Teo, K.G. Lim and R.Y. Lai, Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in Internet usage, Omega 27 (1999), 25-37.
35. R.L. Thompson, C.A. Higgins and J.M. Howell, Personal computing: toward a conceptual model of utilization, MIS Quarterly 15(1) (1991), 125-143.
36. R.L. Thompson, C.A. Higgins and J.M. Howell, Influence of experience on personal computer utilization: testing a conceptual model, Journal of Management Information Systems 1(1) (1994), 167-187.