Imaging in glaucoma

Ophthalmology Clinics of North America

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 33-52

  Stein, Daniel M ^a   Wollstein, Gadi ^a   Schuman, Joel S ^a  

^a University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGE; ARTICLE; BLOOD VESSEL; CORNEA SURGERY; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; EQUIPMENT; ETHNOLOGY; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; MEASUREMENT; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; MYDRIASIS; NERVE FIBER; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; POLARIMETRY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; RETINA DISEASE; SAMPLING; SCANNING LASER OPHTHALMOSCOPY; VISUAL FIELD; VITREOUS OPACITY;

EID: 1942475801     PISSN: 08961549     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0896-1549(03)00102-0     Document Type: Review

References (122)

1. Leske M.C., Heijl A., Hussein M.et al. Factors for glaucoma progression and the effect of treatment: the early manifest glaucoma trial. Arch Ophthalmol. 121(1):2003;48-56.
2. Goldberg I. Relationship between intraocular pressure and preservation of visual field in glaucoma. Surv Ophthalmol. 48:2003;S3-S7.
3. The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS) 7. The relationship between control of intraocular pressure and visual field deterioration. The AGIS Investigators. Am J Ophthalmol. 130(4):2000;429-440.
4. Lichter P.R. Variability of expert observers in evaluating the optic disc. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 74:1976;532-572.
5. Gaasterland D.E., Blackwell B., Dally L.G.et al. The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS): 10. Variability among academic glaucoma subspecialists in assessing optic disc notching. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 99:2001;177-184.
6. Burnstein Y., Ellish N.J., Magbalon M., Higginbotham E.J. Comparison of frequency doubling perimetry with Humphrey visual field analysis in a glaucoma practice. Am J Ophthalmol. 129(3):2000;328-333.
7. Sekhar G.C., Naduvilath T.J., Lakkai M.et al. Sensitivity of Swedish interactive threshold algorithm compared with standard full threshold algorithm in Humphrey visual field testing. Ophthalmology. 107(7):2000;1303-1308.
8. Wadood A.C., Azuara-Blanco A., Aspinall P.et al. Sensitivity and specificity of frequency-doubling technology, tendency-oriented perimetry, and Humphrey Swedish interactive threshold algorithm-fast perimetry in a glaucoma practice. Am J Ophthalmol. 133(3):2002;327-332.
9. Johnson C.A., Sample P.A., Cioffi G.A.et al. Structure and function evaluation (SAFE). I. Criteria for glaucomatous visual field loss using standard automated perimetry (SAP) and short wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP). Am J Ophthalmol. 134(2):2002;177-185.
10. Keltner J.L., Johnson C.A., Quigg J.M.et al. Confirmation of visual field abnormalities in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study. Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study Group. Arch Ophthalmol. 118(9):2000;1187-1194.
11. Sommer A., Pollack I., Maumenee A.E. Optic disc parameters and onset of glaucomatous field loss. I. Methods and progressive changes in disc morphology. Arch Ophthalmol. 97(8):1979;1444-1448.
12. Pederson J., Anderson D. The mode of progressive disc cupping in ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 98:1980;490-495.
13. Quigley H.A., Katz J., Derick R.J.et al. An evaluation of optic disc and nerve fiber layer examinations in monitoring progression of early glaucoma damage. Ophthalmology. 99(1):1992;19-28.
14. Sommer A., Miller N.R., Pollack I.et al. The nerve fiber layer in the diagnosis of glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 95(12):1977;2149-2156.
15. Sommer A., Quigley H.A., Robin A.L.et al. Evaluation of nerve fiber layer assessment. Arch Ophthalmol. 102(12):1984;1766-1771.
16. Sommer A., Katz J., Quigley H.A.et al. Clinically detectable nerve fiber atrophy precedes the onset of glaucomatous field loss. Arch Ophthalmol. 109(1):1991;77-83.
17. Quigley H.A., Addicks E.M., Green W.R. Optic nerve damage in human glaucoma. III. Quantitative correlation of nerve fiber loss and visual field defect in glaucoma, ischemic neuropathy, papilledema, and toxic neuropathy. Arch Ophthalmol. 100(1):1982;135-146.
18. Hattenhauer M.G., Johnson D.H., Ing H.H.et al. The probability of blindness from open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 105(11):1998;2099-2104.
19. Chen P.P. Blindness in patients with treated open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 110(4):2003;726-733.
20. Oliver J.E., Hattenhauer M.G., Herman D.et al. Blindness and glaucoma: a comparison of patients progressing to blindness from glaucoma with patients maintaining vision. Am J Ophthalmol. 133(6):2002;764-772.
21. Polito A., Shah S.M., Haller J.A.et al. Comparison between retinal thickness analyzer and optical coherence tomography for assessment of foveal thickness in eyes with macular disease. Am J Ophthalmol. 134(2):2002;240-251.
22. Master B., Kino G. Confocal microscopy of the eye. Masters B.R. Noninvasive diagnostic techniques in ophthalmology. 1990;Springer-Verlag, New York.
23. Shuman H., Murray J., DiLullo C. Confocal microscopy: an overview. Biotechniques. 7:1989;154-163.
24. Kruse F.E., Burk R.O., Volcker H.E.et al. Reproducibility of topographic measurements of the optic nerve head with laser tomographic scanning. Ophthalmology. 96(9):1989;1320-1324.
25. Dreher A.W., Tso P.C., Weinreb R.N. Reproducibility of topographic measurements of the normal and glaucomatous optic nerve head with the laser tomographic scanner. Am J Ophthalmol. 111(2):1991;221-229.
26. Rohrschneider K., Burk R.O., Kruse F.E., Volcker H.E. Reproducibility of the optic nerve head topography with a new laser tomographic scanning device. Ophthalmology. 101(6):1994;1044-1049.
27. Rohrschneider K., Burk R.O., Volcker H.E. Reproducibility of topometric data acquisition in normal and glaucomatous optic nerve heads with the laser tomographic scanner. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 231(8):1993;457-464.
28. Chauhan B.C., LeBlanc R.P., McCormick T.A., Rogers J.B. Test-retest variability of topographic measurements with confocal scanning laser tomography in patients with glaucoma and control subjects. Am J Ophthalmol. 118(1):1994;9-15.
29. Janknecht P., Funk J. Optic nerve head analyser and Heidelberg retina tomograph: accuracy and reproducibility of topographic measurements in a model eye and in volunteers. Br J Ophthalmol. 78(10):1994;760-768.
30. Weinreb R.N., Lusky M., Bartsch D.U., Morsman D. Effect of repetitive imaging on topographic measurements of the optic nerve head. Arch Ophthalmol. 111(5):1993;636-638.
31. Garway-Heath D.F., Poinoosawmy D., Wollstein G.et al. Inter- and intraobserver variation in the analysis of optic disc images: comparison of the Heidelberg retina tomograph and computer assisted planimetry. Br J Ophthalmol. 83(6):1999;664-669.
32. Sihota R., Gulati V., Agarwal H.C.et al. Variables affecting test-retest variability of Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II stereometric parameters. J Glaucoma. 11(4):2002;321-328.
33. Mikelberg F., Wijsman K., Schulzer M. Reproducibility of topographic parameters obtained with Heidelberg Retina Tomograph. J Glaucoma. 2:1993;101-103.
34. Zangwill L.M., Berry C.C., Weinreb R.N. Optic disc topographic measurements after pupil dilation. Ophthalmology. 106(9):1999;1751-1755.
35. Hatch W.V., Flanagan J.G., Williams-Lyn D.E.et al. Interobserver agreement of Heidelberg retina tomograph parameters. J Glaucoma. 8(4):1999;232-237.
36. Iester M., De Ferrari R., Zanini M. Topographic analysis to discriminate glaucomatous from normal optic nerve heads with a confocal scanning laser: new optic disk analysis without any observer input. Surv Ophthalmol. 44:1999;S33-S40.
37. Tan J.C., Garway-Heath D.F., Fitzke F.W., Hitchings R.A. Reasons for rim area variability in scanning laser tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 44(3):2003;1126-1131.
38. Burk R.O., Vihanninjoki K., Bartke T.et al. Development of the standard reference plane for the Heidelberg retina tomograph. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 238(5):2000;375-384.
39. Park K.H., Caprioli J. Development of a novel reference plane for the Heidelberg retina tomograph with optical coherence tomography measurements. J Glaucoma. 11(5):2002;385-391.
40. Jonas J.B., Mardin C.Y., Grundler A.E. Comparison of measurements of neuroretinal rim area between confocal laser scanning tomography and planimetry of photographs. Br J Ophthalmol. 82(4):1998;362-366.
41. Dichtl A., Jonas J.B., Mardin C.Y. Comparison between tomographic scanning evaluation and photographic measurement of the neuroretinal rim. Am J Ophthalmol. 121(5):1996;494-501.
42. Chauhan B. C., McCormick T.A. Effect of the cardiac cycle on topographic measurements using confocal scanning laser tomography. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 233:1995;568-572.
43. Brigatti L., Caprioli J. Correlation of visual field with scanning confocal laser optic disc measurements in glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 113(9):1995;1191-1194.
44. Iester M., Mikelberg F.S., Courtright P., Drance S.M. Correlation between the visual field indices and Heidelberg retina tomograph parameters. J Glaucoma. 6(2):1997;78-82.
45. Eid T.M., Spaeth G.L., Katz L.J.et al. Quantitative estimation of retinal nerve fiber layer height in glaucoma and the relationship with optic nerve head topography and visual field. J Glaucoma. 6(4):1997;221-230.
46. Hatch W.V., Flanagan J.G., Etchells E.E.et al. Laser scanning tomography of the optic nerve head in ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 81(10):1997;871-876.
47. Iester M., Broadway D.C., Mikelberg F.S., Drance S.M. A comparison of healthy, ocular hypertensive, and glaucomatous optic disc topographic parameters. J Glaucoma. 6(6):1997;363-370.
48. Iester M., Mikelberg F.S., Drance S.M. The effect of optic disc size on diagnostic precision with the Heidelberg retina tomograph. Ophthalmology. 104(3):1997;545-548.
49. Bathija R., Zangwill L., Berry C.C.et al. Detection of early glaucomatous structural damage with confocal scanning laser tomography. J Glaucoma. 7(2):1998;121-127.
50. Mikelberg F.S., Parfitt C.M., Swindale N.V. Ability of the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph to detect early glaucomatous visual field loss. J Glaucoma. 4:1996;242-247.
51. Wollstein G., Garway-Heath D.F., Hitchings R.A. Identification of early glaucoma cases with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Ophthalmology. 105(8):1998;1557-1563.
52. Miglior S., Guareschi M., Albe E.et al. Detection of glaucomatous visual field changes using the Moorfields regression analysis of the Heidelberg retina tomograph. Am J Ophthalmol. 136(1):2003;26-33.
53. Ford B.A., Artes P.H., McCormick T.A.et al. Comparison of data analysis tools for detection of glaucoma with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph. Ophthalmology. 110(6):2003;1145-1150.
54. Bowd C., Chan K., Zangwill L.M.et al. Comparing neural networks and linear discriminant functions for glaucoma detection using confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy of the optic disc. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 43(11):2002;3444-3454.
55. Kamal D.S., Viswanathan A.C., Garway-Heath D.F.et al. Detection of optic disc change with the Heidelberg retina tomograph before confirmed visual field change in ocular hypertensives converting to early glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 83(3):1999;290-294.
56. Chauhan B.C., Blanchard J.W., Hamilton D.C., LeBlanc R.P. Technique for detecting serial topographic changes in the optic disc and peripapillary retina using scanning laser tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 41(3):2000;775-782.
57. Chauhan B.C., McCormick T.A., Nicolela M.T., LeBlanc R.P. Optic disc and visual field changes in a prospective longitudinal study of patients with glaucoma: comparison of scanning laser tomography with conventional perimetry and optic disc photography. Arch Ophthalmol. 119(10):2001;1492-1499.
58. Weinreb R.N., Shakiba S., Zangwill L. Scanning laser polarimetry to measure the nerve fiber layer of normal and glaucomatous eyes. Am J Ophthalmol. 119(5):1995;627-636.
59. Hoh S., Greenfield D., Liebmann J.et al. Effect of pupillary dilation on retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measured by scanning laser polarimetry in eyes with and without cataract. J Glaucoma. 8:1999;159-163.
60. Hollo G., Suveges I., Nagymihaly A., Vargha P. Scanning laser polarimetry of the retinal nerve fibre layer in primary open angle and capsular glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 81(10):1997;857-861.
61. Weinreb R., Dreher A.W., Coleman A.et al. Histopathologic validation of Fourier-ellipsometry measurements of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness. Arch Ophthalmol. 108:1990;557-560.
62. Greenfield D., Knighton R.W., Huang X. Effect of corneal polarization axis on assessment of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness by scanning laser polarimetry. Am J Ophthalmol. 129:2000;715-722.
63. Knighton R.W., Huang X. Linear birefringence of the central human cornea. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 43:2002;82-86.
64. Hoh S.T., Ishikawa H., Greenfield D.S. Peripapillary nerve fiber layer thickness measurement reproducibility using scanning laser polarimetry. J Glaucoma. 7:1998;12-15.
65. Zangwill L., Berry C.A., Garden V.S., Weinreb R.N. Reproducibility of retardation measurements with the nerve fiber analyzer II. J Glaucoma. 6:1997;384-389.
66. Waldock A., Potts M.J., Sparrow J.M., Karwatowski W.S. Clinical evaluation of scanning laser polarimetry. I. Intraoperator reproducibility and design of a blood vessel removal algorithm. Br J Ophthalmol. 82(3):1998;252-259.
67. Poinoosawmy D., Fontana L., Wu J.et al. Variation of nerve fibre layer thickness measurements with age and ethnicity by scanning laser polarimetry. Br J Ophthalmol. 81:1997;350-354.
68. Tjon-Fo-sang M., Lemij H. Retinal nerve fiber layer measurements in normal black subjects as determined with scanning laser polarimetry. Ophthalmology. 105:1998;78-81.
69. Pons M.E., Rothman R.F., Ozden R.G.et al. Vitreous opacities affect scanning laser polarimetry measurements. Am J Ophthalmol. 131(4):2001;511-513.
70. Colen T.P., Lemij H.G. Motion artifacts in scanning laser polarimetry. Ophthalmology. 109(8):2002;1568-1572.
71. Colen T.P., Lemij H.G. Prevalence of split nerve fiber layer bundles in healthy eyes imaged with scanning laser polarimetry. Ophthalmology. 108(1):2001;151-156.
72. Bagga H., Greenfield D.S., Knighton R.W. Scanning laser polarimetry with variable corneal compensation: identification and correction for corneal birefringence in eyes with macular disease. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 44(5):2003;1969-1976.
73. Xu L., Chen P.P., Chen Y.Y.et al. Quantitative nerve fiber layer measurement using scanning laser polarimetry and modulation parameters in the detection of glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 7(4):1998;270-277.
74. Horn F.K., Jonas J.B., Martus P.et al. Polarimetric measurement of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in glaucoma diagnosis. J Glaucoma. 8(6):1999;353-362.
75. Kogure S., Iijima H., Tsukahara S. A new parameter for assessing the thickness of the retinal nerve fiber layer for glaucoma diagnosis. Eur J Ophthalmol. 9(2):1999;93-98.
76. Essock E.A., Sinai M.J., Fechtner R.D.et al. Fourier analysis of nerve fiber layer measurements from scanning laser polarimetry in glaucoma: emphasizing shape characteristics of the 'double-hump' pattern. J Glaucoma. 9(6):2000;444-452.
77. Hoh S.T., Greenfield D.S., Mistlberger A.et al. Optical coherence tomography and scanning laser polarimetry in normal, ocular hypertensive, and glaucomatous eyes. Am J Ophthalmol. 129(2):2000;129-135.
78. Bowd C., Zangwill L.M., Berry C.C.et al. Detecting early glaucoma by assessment of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and visual function. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 42(9):2001;1993-2003.
79. Sinai M.J., Essock E.A., Fechtner R.D., Srinivasan N. Diffuse and localized nerve fiber layer loss measured with a scanning laser polarimeter: sensitivity and specificity of detecting glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 9(2):2000;154-162.
80. Choplin N.T., Lundy D.C. The sensitivity and specificity of scanning laser polarimetry in the detection of glaucoma in a clinical setting. Ophthalmology. 108(5):2001;899-904.
81. Poinoosawmy D., Tan J.C., Bunce C., Hitchings R.A. The ability of the GDx nerve fibre analyser neural network to diagnose glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 239(2):2001;122-127.
82. Sanchez-Galeana C., Bowd C., Blumenthal E.Z.et al. Using optical imaging summary data to detect glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 108(10):2001;1812-1818.
83. Zangwill L.M., Bowd C., Berry C.C.et al. Discriminating between normal and glaucomatous eyes using the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph, GDx Nerve Fiber Analyzer, and Optical Coherence Tomograph. Arch Ophthalmol. 119(7):2001;985-993.
84. Bozkurt B., Irkec M., Karaagaoglu E., Orhan M. Scanning laser polarimetric analysis of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in Turkish patients with glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Eur J Ophthalmol. 12(5):2002;406-412.
85. Funaki S., Shirakashi M., Yaoeda K.et al. Specificity and sensitivity of glaucoma detection in the Japanese population using scanning laser polarimetry. Br J Ophthalmol. 86(1):2002;70-74.
86. Greaney M.J., Hoffman D.C., Garway-Heath D.F.et al. Comparison of optic nerve imaging methods to distinguish normal eyes from those with glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 43(1):2002;140-145.
87. Weinreb R.N., Bowd C., Zangwill L.M. Glaucoma detection using scanning laser polarimetry with variable corneal polarization compensation. Arch Ophthalmol. 121(2):2003;218-224.
88. Bowd C., Zangwill L.M., Weinreb R.N. Association between scanning laser polarimetry measurements using variable corneal polarization compensation and visual field sensitivity in glaucomatous eyes. Arch Ophthalmol. 121(7):2003;961-966.
89. Bagga H., Greenfield D.S., Feuer W., Knighton R.W. Scanning laser polarimetry with variable corneal compensation and optical coherence tomography in normal and glaucomatous eyes. Am J Ophthalmol. 135(4):2003;521-529.
90. Reus N.J., Colen T.P., Lemij H.G. Visualization of localized retinal nerve fiber layer defects with the GDx with individualized and with fixed compensation of anterior segment birefringence. Ophthalmology. 110(8):2003;1512-1516.
91. Colen T.P., Lemij H.G. Sensitivity and specificity of the GDx: clinical judgment of standard printouts versus the number. J Glaucoma. 12(2):2003;129-133.
92. Nguyen N.X., Horn F.K., Hayler J.et al. Retinal nerve fiber layer measurements using laser scanning polarimetry in different stages of glaucomatous optic nerve damage. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 240(8):2002;608-614.
93. Lauande-Pimentel R., Carvalho R.A., Oliveira H.C.et al. Discrimination between normal and glaucomatous eyes with visual field and scanning laser polarimetry measurements. Br J Ophthalmol. 85(5):2001;586-591.
94. Medeiros F.A., Zangwill L.M., Bowd C.et al. Fourier analysis of scanning laser polarimetry measurements with variable corneal compensation in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 44(6):2003;2606-2612.
95. Huang D., Swanson E.A., Lin C.P.et al. Optical coherence tomography. Science. 254(5035):1991;1178-1181.
96. Schuman J.S., Pedut-Kloizman T., Hertzmark E.et al. Reproducibility of nerve fiber layer thickness measurements using optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 103(11):1996;1889-1898.
97. Drexler W., Morgner U., Ghanta R.K.et al. Ultrahigh-resolution ophthalmic optical coherence tomography. Nat Med. 7(4):2001;502-507.
98. Blumenthal E.Z., Williams J.M., Weinreb R.N.et al. Reproducibility of nerve fiber layer thickness measurements by use of optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 107(12):2000;2278-2282.
99. Koozekanani D., Roberts C., Katz S.E., Herderick E.E. Intersession repeatability of macular thickness measurements with the Humphrey 2000 OCT. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 41(6):2000;1486-1491.
100. Konno S., Akiba J., Yoshida A. Retinal thickness measurements with optical coherence tomography and the scanning retinal thickness analyzer. Retina. 21(1):2001;57-61.
101. Massin P., Vicaut E., Haouchine B.et al. Reproducibility of retinal mapping using optical coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol. 119(8):2001;1135-1142.
102. Muscat S., Parks S., Kemp E., Keating D. Repeatability and reproducibility of macular thickness measurements with the Humphrey OCT system. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 43(2):2002;490-495.
103. Jones A.L., Sheen N.J., North R.V., Morgan J.E. The Humphrey optical coherence tomography scanner: quantitative analysis and reproducibility study of the normal human retinal nerve fibre layer. Br J Ophthalmol. 85(6):2001;673-677.
104. Carpineto P., Ciancaglini M., Zuppardi E.et al. Reliability of nerve fiber layer thickness measurements using optical coherence tomography in normal and glaucomatous eyes. Ophthalmology. 110(1):2003;190-195.
105. Gurses-Ozden R., Ishikawa H., Hoh S.T.et al. Increasing sampling density improves reproducibility of optical coherence tomography measurements. J Glaucoma. 8(4):1999;238-241.
106. Schuman J.S., Hee M.R., Puliafito C.A.et al. Quantification of nerve fiber layer thickness in normal and glaucomatous eyes using optical coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol. 113(5):1995;586-596.
107. Mok K.H., Lee V.W., So K.F. Retinal nerve fiber layer measurement of the Hong Kong Chinese population by optical coherence tomography. J Glaucoma. 11(6):2002;481-483.
108. Varma R., Bazzaz S., Lai M. Optical tomography-measured retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in normal Latinos. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 44(8):2003;3369-3373.
109. Guedes V., Schuman J.S., Hertzmark E.et al. Optical coherence tomography measurement of macular and nerve fiber layer thickness in normal and glaucomatous human eyes. Ophthalmology. 110(1):2003;177-189.
110. Bowd C., Weinreb R.N., Williams J.M., Zangwill L.M. The retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in ocular hypertensive, normal, and glaucomatous eyes with optical coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol. 118(1):2000;22-26.
111. Soliman M.A., Van Den Berg T.J., Ismaeil A.A.et al. Retinal nerve fiber layer analysis: relationship between optical coherence tomography and red-free photography. Am J Ophthalmol. 133(2):2002;187-195.
112. Greenfield D.S., Bagga H., Knighton R.W. Macular thickness changes in glaucomatous optic neuropathy detected using optical coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol. 121(1):2003;41-46.
113. Lederer D.E., Schuman J.S., Hertzmark E.et al. Analysis of macular volume in normal and glaucomatous eyes using optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol. 135(6):2003;838-843.
114. Schuman J.S., Wollstein G., Farra T.et al. Comparison of optic nerve head measurements obtained by optical coherence tomography and confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy. Am J Ophthalmol. 135(4):2003;504-512.
115. Essock E.A., Sinai M.J., Bowd C.et al. Fourier analysis of optical coherence tomography and scanning laser polarimetry retinal nerve fiber layer measurements in the diagnosis of glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 121(9):2003;1238- 1245.
116. Zeimer R.C., Mori M.T., Khoobehi B. Feasibility test of a new method to measure retinal thickness noninvasively. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 30(10):1989;2099-2105.
117. Zeimer R., Shahidi M., Mori M.et al. A new method for rapid mapping of the retinal thickness at the posterior pole. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 37(10):1996;1994-2001.
118. Neubauer A.S., Priglinger S., Ullrich S.et al. Comparison of foveal thickness measured with the retinal thickness analyzer and optical coherence tomography. Retina. 21(6):2001;596-601.
119. Fritsche P., van der Heijde R., Suttorp-Schulten M.S., Polak B.C. Retinal thickness analysis (RTA): an objective method to assess and quantify the retinal thickness in healthy controls and in diabetics without diabetic retinopathy. Retina. 22(6):2002;768-771.
120. Polito A., Shah S.M., Haller J.A.et al. Comparison between retinal thickness analyzer and optical coherence tomography for assessment of foveal thickness in eyes with macular disease. Am J Ophthalmol. 134(2):2002;240-251.
121. Zeimer R., Asrani S., Zou S.et al. Quantitative detection of glaucomatous damage at the posterior pole by retinal thickness mapping: a pilot study. Ophthalmology. 105(2):1998;224-231.
122. Mistlberger A., Liebmann J.M., Greenfield D.S.et al. Heidelberg retina tomography and optical coherence tomography in normal, ocular-hypertensive, and glaucomatous eyes. Ophthalmology. 106(10):1999;2027-2032.